Authoring environment
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Definition
- An authoring environment is toolkit to build software or digital contents.
- An educational authoring environment allows to create artifacts like web sites, interactive hypermedia, microworlds, simulations,
Some authors make finer distinctions, e.g. in Locatis and Al-Nuaim historical review and analysis (1999), “the term authoring tool refers to a range of software products having utilities for composing, editing, assembling, and managing multimedia objects, while the term authoring system refers to a subset of these products allowing multimedia development without having to program.”
A short history
- PLATO-like systems
- Programming toolkits for Videodisks
- Programming toolkits with multimedia extensions
- Multimedia authoring systems
- Web authoring systems
- Learning object repository and educational object communities
- Half baked systems (see Teacher empowerment)
See also:
- Educational technology for general overview of the field and Educational technologies for other technologies
- Design methodology
Genres
- According to difficulty, e.g.
- Programming toolkits, often used together with an integrated development environment (IDE)
- Visual languages to author interactive systems
- Content authoring systems
- According to data formats
(see various entries)
- Multimedia formats in various forms (bitmap graphics, vector graphics, etc.), e.g. tools for formats like:
- Interactive educational multimedia (see: Multimedia authoring systems)
- Macromedia Authorware
- Hypercard and followups like Revolution
- E-learning standards
- Most LMSs do include an authoring environment through web-based forms. See IMS Content Packaging.
- Activity-based systems like LAMS and the IMS Learning Design Reload editor.
- According to educational function
- Editors for microworlds, e.g:
- Squeak, in particular its visual eToys scripting language.
- LEGO Mindstorms
- ToonTalk
- AgentSheets
- Editors for simulations
- STELLA
- Editors for drill and practise programs (see also [[CBT])
- E-learning content editors
Sociology of authoring and reuse
Authoring by teachers
"Lessons learned" of the East/West group (Spohrer, Summer & Shum, 1998).
- The first lesson can be summarized as follows: 'No matter how easy to use one makes an authoring tool through clever applications of cognitive science and technology, only a small fraction of the people with good ideas about instructional software and capable of learning to use the tools will in fact build things. The majority of people will instead make suggestions and try to influence what the builders are building.
- The second lesson can be summarized as follows: 'Often the people most capable of doing a job such as improving a piece of educational software are prevented from doing the job by social convention, intellectual property protection barriers, or business model restrictions.'
- The third lesson is just common sense in hindsight, and can be summarized as follows: 'What is the first question an authoring tool user should ask before using a tool to create a piece of educational software? Answer: Does the software or something like it already exist, and, if so, who created it and will they allow it to be reused?'
Towards Authoring communities ?
Links
- Educational Authoring Tools and the Educational Object Economy, Special issue of JiME.
References
- Locatis,Craig, Al-Nuaim,Hana (1999), Interactive technology and authoring tools: A historical review and analysis, Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 3, 9/18/1999, Pages 63-75, DOI 10.1007/BF02299634 (Access restricted)
- Repenning, A., Ioannidou, A. and Ambach, J. (1998). Learn to Communicate and Communicate to Learn. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98 (7). HTML Hypertext - HTML