COAP:COAP-2170/week3: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 66: Line 66:
* You can organize your report in any way you like. Just make sure that it looks like an interesting design document that could be used to redesign the [[information architecture]].
* You can organize your report in any way you like. Just make sure that it looks like an interesting design document that could be used to redesign the [[information architecture]].
* Do '''not''' think about the website design. All I want is that you think about how to structure information ...
* Do '''not''' think about the website design. All I want is that you think about how to structure information ...
== Reading ==
* [[Card sorting]] (Wiki article)
Also suggested:
* [http://www.userfocus.co.uk/pdf/Bright_Ideas_for_UX_Designers.pdf Bright Ideas for User Experience Designers]. This free online booklet contains several chapters of interest. E.g. the chapters "7 myths about paper prototyping", "Card Games for Information Architects"

Revision as of 12:07, 14 January 2015

COAP 2170 Week 3 program

In week three we will do two things:

  • Wrap up week 1 and 2 (usability guidelines review and usability testing) through a review meeting
  • Learn about designing an information architecture

Monday - Early design stages

  • Focus group meetings
  • Analysis of competitor's websites, e.g. with the tools seen so far
  • Card sorting is a popular technique for planning the information architecture of a website. It may be used to figure out an initial proposal and also to test this proposal with potential users.
Introductory videos
Card sorting activity (see also homework 3 below)
  • Create cards by looking at a Webster website and writing down the most important information pages
or get them cards for Webster.ch 2011 from here. Best bet is webster-ch-titles.pdf
Scraped 2012 Webster web sites can be found here.
  • Sort cards into piles (categories)
  • Name categories
  • Discuss and compare solutions

Wednesday

(1) Review meeting preparation
  • Retrieve your hw1 + hw2 and look at it
  • Also here
(2) Review meeting
  • Students will present highlights from homework 1 and 2 and engage in discussion.
  • No preparation is needed for this (except doing homework 2 and turning it in before start of class)

Program: For each Webster website

  • Home page and overall general impression
  • Selected usability tests and results.
  • Discussion of the tools used
(3) Card sorting continued
  • Start / continue / finish card sort
  • Discuss precise homework requirements

Homework 3

(1) Complete the card sorting activity if needed

(2) Write a short report that includes:

  • A short description of the domain (web site or part of the website for which you are doing the information architecture categories)
  • A list of categories that you found (you decide about the number and whether you need subcategories or not)
  • Describe each category with a few sentences
  • You also could explain why these categories should be appropriate
  • Short conclusion

Other issues:

  • You can turn in group work. Make sure to put the name of each participant on top of the paper. Also, I expect group work to be "richer" than individual work. Of course, individually handed in homework, also could start from commonly found categories and then include an individual report/view of the results ...
  • You can organize your report in any way you like. Just make sure that it looks like an interesting design document that could be used to redesign the information architecture.
  • Do not think about the website design. All I want is that you think about how to structure information ...

Reading

Also suggested: