Madeline Hunter method: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


The '''Madeline Hunter method''' is a kind of [[direct instruction]] model.
The '''Madeline Hunter method''' is a kind of [[direct instruction]] model and method. It is popular in US [[lesson planning]].


== The model ==
== The model ==
Disclaimer: [[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] did not read original work of M.Hunter. In the literature and web pages consulted, there a various variants of the typical "scenario steps". Usually it has either 7 or steps.
This model is quite closely associated with typical general behaviorist/cognitivist [[instructional design model]]s like Gagne's [[Nine events of instruction]].
=== From a preparation perspective ===
;(1) Objectives and standards
* Fix them
;(2) Prepare teaching materials
* Anticipation: Prepare materials to grab the student's attention and put him in "the right frame"
* Teaching: (input): Prepare "input" materials.
* Teaching (modeling): Prepare relevant examples that show what is expected
* Guide practice: Prepare exerices and other activities
* Closure: Rehearse a nice closing statement (that show what has been learnt, to point out important things, etc.)
* Independant practice: E.g. home work or group work. Should reinforce ''and'' engage learners in decontextualization (by have them work on examples from different context)
=== From a scenario perspective ===


;(1) Anticipation
;(1) Anticipation
* A short wake-up activity that get's the student's attention ''and'' interest
* e.g. a simple question, an example problem,
;(2) Objectives, purpose, standards
* Tell the students what he will learn
* And (if necessary) how this knowledge will be tested
;(3) Input (teaching basic concepts and skills)
* Summarize definitions
* Demonstrate basic skills
;(4) Modeling (show)
* Demonstrate application of concepts and skill with a worked through example.
;(5) Guided practice
* have learners do exercises
;(6) Monitoring
* This is not precisely a step in time, monitoring has to be done in different ways:
* During and after steps 3 and 4, the teacher has to ''check for understanding'' (this is often presented as step number 5 in fact).
* After steps 5 and 6 students have to be tested which is different sort of "checking for understanding", e.g. if guided practice shows misunderstanding or bad understanding, go back to step 3 and/or 4 and adapt.


;(2) Objectives and standards
;(7) Independent practice
* Students practice on their own (either in or out of class).


;(3) teaching
;(8) closure
* input
* Wrap up
* modeling
* check for understanding


;(4) guided practice
[http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/205/madelinehunter.htm Jonathan Mueller] presents the Madeline Hunter Lesson Plan format in a way [[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] likes better. His outline separates more clearly different phases:
{{quotationbox |
;Getting students set to learn


;(5) monitoring
Step 1: Review
Step 2: Anticipatory Set
Step 3: Objective
;Instruction


;(6) independent practice
Step 4: Input and Modeling


;(7) closure
;Checking for understanding


Step 5: Checking Understanding
Step 6: Guided Practice
;Independent practice
Step 7: Independent Practice
}}
Note: Mueller points out that {{quotation | How are checking understanding and guided practice different? Checking understanding occurs in the process of instruction. Guided practice takes place just after instruction has occurred. Checking for understanding is often a whole-class process by observing body language or asking a simple question to the whole class. Guided practice may be done individually. Both involve quickly assessing whether students understand what has just been presented.}}


== Links ==
== Links ==


* [http://www.humboldt.edu/%7Etha1/hunter-eei.html Some Basic Lesson Presentation Elements] (presents the Madeline Hunter Method).
* [http://www.humboldt.edu/%7Etha1/hunter-eei.html Some Basic Lesson Presentation Elements] (presents the Madeline Hunter Method).
* [http://template.aea267.iowapages.org/lessonplan/ Madeline Hunter's Lesson Plan].
* [http://faculty.leeu.edu/~bestes/resources/whitepaper.htm A White Paper on Lesson Planning] by Cliff Schimmels.
* [http://math-and-reading-help-for-kids.org/articles/Formatting_Lesson_Plans:_The_Madeline_Hunter_Lesson_Design_Model.html Formatting Lesson Plans: The Madeline Hunter Lesson Design Model]
* [http://coe.nevada.edu/ckeeler/LessonPlanTemplates/hunter.html Hunter Method] by Christy Keeler. This includes an example.
* [http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/205/madelinehunter.htm Madeline Hunter's Lesson Plan Format] by


== References ==
== References ==
Line 37: Line 102:
* Hunter, M. (1985). What's wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42(5), 57-60.
* Hunter, M. (1985). What's wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42(5), 57-60.


* Hunter, Robin (2004). Madeline Hunter's Mastery Teaching, Corwin Press. ISBN 076193930X (Seems to be the most popular modern M. Hunter method textbook)


[[Category: Instructional design models]]
[[Category: Instructional design models]]

Revision as of 14:35, 29 September 2006

Draft

Definition

The Madeline Hunter method is a kind of direct instruction model and method. It is popular in US lesson planning.

The model

Disclaimer: DSchneider did not read original work of M.Hunter. In the literature and web pages consulted, there a various variants of the typical "scenario steps". Usually it has either 7 or steps.

This model is quite closely associated with typical general behaviorist/cognitivist instructional design models like Gagne's Nine events of instruction.

From a preparation perspective

(1) Objectives and standards
  • Fix them
(2) Prepare teaching materials
  • Anticipation: Prepare materials to grab the student's attention and put him in "the right frame"
  • Teaching: (input): Prepare "input" materials.
  • Teaching (modeling): Prepare relevant examples that show what is expected
  • Guide practice: Prepare exerices and other activities
  • Closure: Rehearse a nice closing statement (that show what has been learnt, to point out important things, etc.)
  • Independant practice: E.g. home work or group work. Should reinforce and engage learners in decontextualization (by have them work on examples from different context)

From a scenario perspective

(1) Anticipation
  • A short wake-up activity that get's the student's attention and interest
  • e.g. a simple question, an example problem,
(2) Objectives, purpose, standards
  • Tell the students what he will learn
  • And (if necessary) how this knowledge will be tested
(3) Input (teaching basic concepts and skills)
  • Summarize definitions
  • Demonstrate basic skills
(4) Modeling (show)
  • Demonstrate application of concepts and skill with a worked through example.
(5) Guided practice
  • have learners do exercises
(6) Monitoring
  • This is not precisely a step in time, monitoring has to be done in different ways:
  • During and after steps 3 and 4, the teacher has to check for understanding (this is often presented as step number 5 in fact).
  • After steps 5 and 6 students have to be tested which is different sort of "checking for understanding", e.g. if guided practice shows misunderstanding or bad understanding, go back to step 3 and/or 4 and adapt.
(7) Independent practice
  • Students practice on their own (either in or out of class).
(8) closure
  • Wrap up

Jonathan Mueller presents the Madeline Hunter Lesson Plan format in a way DSchneider likes better. His outline separates more clearly different phases:

Getting students set to learn

Step 1: Review Step 2: Anticipatory Set Step 3: Objective

Instruction

Step 4: Input and Modeling

Checking for understanding

Step 5: Checking Understanding Step 6: Guided Practice

Independent practice
Step 7: Independent Practice

Note: Mueller points out that “How are checking understanding and guided practice different? Checking understanding occurs in the process of instruction. Guided practice takes place just after instruction has occurred. Checking for understanding is often a whole-class process by observing body language or asking a simple question to the whole class. Guided practice may be done individually. Both involve quickly assessing whether students understand what has just been presented.”

Links


References

  • Burns Alvin C., (2006) Teaching experientially with the Madeline Hunter Method: An application in a marketing research course, Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 37, No. 2, 284-294, DOI: 10.1177/1046878106287954 Abstract PDF (Access restricted)
  • Hunter, M. (1982). Mastery teaching. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.
  • Hunter, M. (1985). What's wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42(5), 57-60.
  • Hunter, Robin (2004). Madeline Hunter's Mastery Teaching, Corwin Press. ISBN 076193930X (Seems to be the most popular modern M. Hunter method textbook)