Learning management system: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 70: Line 70:


=== Online services ===
=== Online services ===
Most of these hosted LMS are commercial, but some basic services may be free. In addition to providing LMSs or individual classes to organizations and teachers, there is also a trend for selling contents as service, e.g. like [http://openclassroom.org openclassroom] or [[MOOC]] services like Coursera.
Most of these hosted LMS are commercial, but some basic services may be free. In addition to providing LMSs or individual classes to organizations and teachers, there is also a trend for selling contents as service, e.g. like [http://openclassroom.com openclassroom] or [[MOOC]] services like Coursera.


* [http://www.myccnet.com/ CCNet]
* [http://www.myccnet.com/ CCNet]

Revision as of 11:12, 27 January 2017

Definition

A Learning Management System (sometimes also called "Course Management System", "Pedagogical Platform", "E-Learning Platform") is a software system that delivers courseware plus e-tutoring over the Internet.

LMS should not be your starting point. Typically, when decision makers talk about E-Learning they want to know what system to install. First of all, so called LMS are not the only answer, you also can implement E-Learning with other tools (e.g. groupware, content management systems or even a wiki or other hypertext system, often in combination with a forum. Second, in any case you should start by thinking about an appropriate instructional design that uses appropriate teaching strategies for various learning types.

““LMS” is a catchall term in SCORM. It refers to a suite of functionalities designed to deliver, track, report on and manage learning content, learner progress and learner interactions. “LMS” can apply to very simple course management systems, or highly complex enterprise-wide, distributed environments.” (SCORM 2004 3rd Edition Overview Version 1.0)

See also:

Components of an LMS

Feature lists are getting quite long and it is not easy to decide which features are the most important unless you have a good background in various areas like instructional design, ergonomics and systems management.

Typical features are:

  • Course Management, e.g. lists of courses, registration, credit information and syllabus, pre-requisites
  • Teaching Materials, i.e. courseware
  • Self-assessment quizzes
  • Lessons tools: Authoring for contents (structured XML or HTML) and quizzing/testing (e.g. Java Script generators) or alternatively ability to import standard IMS or SCORM packages developed with an external tool (e.g. Dreamweaver).
  • Asynchronous Communication: email, forums
  • Synchronous Communication: chat, whiteboard, teleconferencing,
  • Student tools: Home page, self tests, bookmarks, progress tracking, ....
  • Student Management Tools: progress tracking, on-line grading (assessment), ....
  • Learner feedback: course evaluation surveys, test evaluation surveys etc.

Usually LMS are closed circuit platforms (logins, restricted access to classes), so the idea of sharing contents and reusing products generated during classes does not exist in the world of "LMSs" (main-stream e-learning).

List of software

These lists needs updating, therefore, before looking our lists please check the links section at the end of this page. Others do a much better job than we do. In addition, it is very difficult to find truly independant reviews by real experts - Daniel K. Schneider (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2013 (CEST)

Free / Open Sourcource Portalware

Software to install on your own server, some are probably also availble through commercial hosting or cloud services.

You can try out some of these system at http://www.opensourcecms.com/ (in addition to many other portalware). You will have full administrator rights (all systems will be refreshed every hour).

Online services

Most of these hosted LMS are commercial, but some basic services may be free. In addition to providing LMSs or individual classes to organizations and teachers, there is also a trend for selling contents as service, e.g. like openclassroom or MOOC services like Coursera.

  • CCNet
  • Haiku LMS
  • Canvas, a popular, more recent cloud-based system. As of 2013, many sites seem to migrate from Blackboard to this. It does have a Auth2 / https / JSON based API. Single teachers can sign up for free. There is also a community edition can be installed on your machines.
  • FeatherCap (trial version available)
  • ProProfs (free version available)
  • KoolLearning, new in 2013. Offers good integration of resources.
  • Adobe captivate prime
  • Schoology, A LMS-social platform hybrid. Single teacher free account.
  • Easygenerator. As of 2016, a new tincan/scorm compliant system with an easy to use interface.

Commercial

These are either available for self-hosting, as service or both.

See also rapid elearning, more popular in industry (low-level) training

Links

There are many sites that will give you advice on how to choose a standard, main-stream E-Learning System:

  • Course Management Systems (formerly Landonline).
    • Probably the best site out there, if you are interested in criteria-based selection of an LMS
    • This site was built to assist higher education in using a more rational decision making process to review the many options for a course management system.
  • The Re.ViCa wiki has been set up to provide an inventory and to show the results of a systematic review of Virtual Campus initiatives of the past decade within higher education throughout the world.
  • What is an LMS Free educational resource site with comprehensive articles explaining the different aspects of Learning Management Systems: features checklists, cost comparisons, support & technology, enterprise LMS checklists, LMS vendor comparisons, LMS & LCMS comparisons, proprietary/open source & SaaS LMS comparisons and many more.

Bibliography

Usability / Evaluation of LMS studies
  • Inversini, A., Botturi, L. & Triacca, L. (2006). Evaluating LMS Usability for Enhanced eLearning Experience. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 595-601). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved March 4, 2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/23070.
  • Chua B. B., & Dyson, L. E. (2004). Applying the ISO 9126 Model to the Evaluation of an e-Learning System. Proc. of ASCILITE 2004, December 5-8, Perth, Australia, pp. 184-190.
  • Al-sarrayrih, Haytham S.; Lars Knipping, Erhard Zorn, Evaluation of a MOODLE Based Learning Management System Applied at Berlin Institute of Technology Based on ISO-9126, ICL2010. PDF
  • Chandra, V., D. Fisher, and V. S. Chang. 2011. “Investigating higher education and secondary school web-based learning environments using the WEBLEI.” In Technologies for enhancing pedagogy, engagement and empowerment in education: creating learning-friendly environments, ed. Thao Le and Quynh Le, 93-104. USA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective, 1-18.
  • Chang, V. (1999). Evaluating the effectiveness of online learning using a new web based learning instrument. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1999. http://www.waier.org.au/forums/1999/chang.html
  • Kurilovas, E. (2009). Methods of Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the Quality of Learning Management Systems for Personalised Learners Needs. European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL'2009), 1-10, Retrieved from: http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/lms-ale-09/Kurilovas_paper.pdf
  • Srdevic, B., Pipan, M., Srdevic, Z., Arh, T. (2012). AHP Supported Evaluation of LMS Quality. International Workshop on the Interplay between User Experience (UX) Evaluation and System Development (I-UxSED 2012). NordiCHI 2012.
  • Vinesh Chandra, Darrell L. Fisher, Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment, Learning Environments Research, April 2009, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 31-44.