C3MS: Difference between revisions
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Some of these tools are [[awareness | Some of these tools are [[awareness tool]]s : elements that answer "who, what, where, when, and how". | ||
== C3MS in education == | == C3MS in education == | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 12 May 2006
Definition
- C3MS stands for Community, Collaboration, Content Management System, i.e. portal software that allows to manage a community, collaboration between members and contents. C3MS can refer to either a existing portal that includes several usually simple modules or to portalware (i.e. the toolkit) needed to install and configure the portal.
- DSchneider thinks that a C3MS is not a true Content management system (CMS), because true CMSs offer better fonctionality for defining templates, workflows etc. A C3MS is rather a collection of many applications including a lot of mini-CMSs, like a News engine, blogs, links management, image management, etc.
- DSchneider claims to have invented the term in the Community, Content and Collaboration Management Systems: Socio-Constructivist Scenarios for the Masses? short paper presented at Ed-Media 2002. The idea was enable tracing the impact of our ideas on educational designs using this kind of software. On October 2004 for "C3MS education" there were 380 hits on Google, on march 14000 hits (a typical growth pattern). If you don't like "C3MS", just use something like "modular portalware" or "community portal".
- Variants: "Community, content, collaborative management system", Community, Content, and Collaborative Management System", "Communicate, Collaborate & Coordinate Management System".
C3MS components
Here is a table of typical C3MS components along with a list of functions useful to activity-based pedagogical designs. This is not a canonical list, it only demonstrates the spirit.
|
Function |
C3MS modules (tools of the portal) |
|---|---|
|
Content management |
News engine (including a organization by topics and an annotation mechanism) |
|
Knowledge exchange |
News syndication (headlines from other portals) |
|
Exchange of arguments |
Forums and/or new engine |
|
Project support |
Project management modules, |
|
Knowledge management |
FAQ manager |
|
Community management |
Presence, profile and identification of members |
Some of these tools are awareness tools : elements that answer "who, what, where, when, and how".
C3MS in education
The abstract of Schneider et al. (2003) argues that C3MS' can fill in need as "scenario and "community" engine.
- Recent interest for rich activity-based pedagogies that originate in various socio-constructivist schools of thought is tied to the goal of creating deeper, more integrated and more applicable knowledge. We also want students become better general problem solvers and better group workers. Finally there is a pressure to make learning more interesting and even more fun. However, experiments made with learner-centered "new pedagogies" have shown that automatic results are not guaranteed. Good pedagogical design is crucial to their success. The efforts to make "new pedagogies" effective requires the use of structured scenarios where the teacher has to fulfill a triple role of facilitator, manager and "orchestrator". In addition, learning should happen within a social space that provides intellectual and emotional support. Therefore, supporting technology, i.e. virtual learning environments, should be designed both as "scenario engine" and as true virtual space where participants have "presence". Such systems can be implemented with Community, Content and Collaboration Management Systems (C3MS) that have been developed for collaborative portal sites. According to our experience, they allow us to create learning environments that provide a "clear focus" (learning activity support, management and scenario orchestration) but also necessary "fuzzy edges" (community support).
Scenario planning
Pedagogical story-boarding with a C3MS follows a simple principle. The teacher creates a pedagogical scenario (activity) by defining different phases of the work process. Each phase contains at least an elementary activity which in turn should be supported by a tool (portal brick). Larger projects can contain several smaller scenarios. The scenario building bricks, i.e. elementary activities are something like "search on the Internet", "insert a link", "make a comment", "coedit a text", "vote for something", "enter an item to a glossary". It is needless to say that portals can not provide all the tools than can be imagined, e.g. on-line drawing programs are hard to find. Anyhow, it should be planned that at least the products of some activity should be posted to the portal, in order to discuss, annotate and reuse them. In the TECFA SEED teacher's catalog we classify the scenarios according to the following categories:
- Gathering and distribution of information: Teachers and students share resources and the activities are designed to create a "critical mass of input", i.e. help them gather information and make it available to all.
- Creation of collaborative documents: Here the students can write definitions, analyse cases, solve problems, write documents and create illustrated documents together around specific themes.
- Discussion and commentaries around productions: Students identify together facts, principles and concepts and clarify complex ideas. They formulate hypothesis and plan solutions, make links between ideas, compare different points of view, argue, evaluate, etc.
Community, flow and creativity boosting with C3MS portals
While as we showed before, C3MS portal provide rich functionalities for pedagogical "story-boarding" they have been designed first of all as community portals and therefore are ideally suited to boost collective learning, creativity and optimal experience.
First, the portal should be a rich information space for " domain support " and it should encourage students add their own contribution. Such a space also encourages exploration . Typical tools are links managers, wikis, news engines and RSS feed that keep users up-to-date about articles posted to other interesting portals or individual weblogs.
Intellectual support is provided via forums, annotations and articles. Student productions are always accessible to all (including visitors) and therefore provide for recognition . One could manage activities by using various standard tools like articles, forums and the calendar, but it may be more appropriate to use special tools, e.g. simple project management tools or special purpose ones. In our experience, it has been shown that students are more like to contribute to an environment if they own an identity . In the student's partly automatically generated home page on the portal one can see their contributions, read public parts of their personal blog and conversely each production in the portal is signed with a clickable link to the author. A successful teaching by projects pedagogy needs to provide strong emotional support and it is therefore important to encourage spontaneous, playful interaction and corner's for humour that will augment quality of on-line life and contribute to class spirit. Tools like the shoutbox or a little quotation box can do wonders.
See also creativity, community and motivation.
References
- Daniel Schneider with Paraskevi Synteta, Catherine Frété, Fabien Girardin, Stéphane Morand (2003) Conception and implementation of rich pedagogical scenarios through collaborative portal sites: clear focus and fuzzy edges. ICOOL International Conference on Open and Online Learning, December 7-13, 2003, University of Mauritius.
- Several similar articles from DSchneider and al. are available (also one in french and german)
- Class, Barbara et Mireille Bétrancourt (2004) Un portail en éducation à distance : vers quelle ergonomie pédagogique ? / Ergonomics, community portal and distance learning : some pedagogical issues", Actes Ergo'IA 2004 [1]