Forum: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Incomplete}}


[[under construction]]
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


Line 6: Line 6:


* Original definition of the word: The open public space in the middle of a Roman city, especially the Roman Forum (eg Roman Forum) [[Wikipedia:Forum | Wikipedia]]
* Original definition of the word: The open public space in the middle of a Roman city, especially the Roman Forum (eg Roman Forum) [[Wikipedia:Forum | Wikipedia]]
Forums have been used long before the World-Wide Web came into existence. E.g. Harasim's well known reader (1990) is based on 1986-1987 workshop and Murray Turoff in the foreword claims "having observed and participated in the evolution of computer-mediated communication ([[CMC]]) since the late 1960s.
See also: [[computer-mediated communication]] and [[e-mail]]


== Technical kinds of forums ==
== Technical kinds of forums ==


There are four major families according to functionality
There are five major families according to functionality


* Pre-Internet [[bulletin board system]]s (BBS)
* Threaded forums display discussions in threads like "old" UseNet News Forums did.
* Threaded forums display discussions in threads like "old" UseNet News Forums did.
* "Boxed" forums display discussions in boxes within boxes (boxes are arranded in linear fashion).
* "Boxed" forums display discussions in boxes within boxes (boxes are arranged in linear fashion). These are the most popular today and for reasons [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] can't quite understand ...
* Specially enhanced forums for education, like [[Knowledge forum]] or a computer-mediated anchored forum (e.g. CaMILE)
* Specially enhanced forums for education, like [[Knowledge forum]] or a computer-mediated [[anchored forum]] (e.g. CaMILE)
* Groupware systems that were originally conceived as forums + uploads (e.g. BSCW).
* [[Groupware]] systems that were originally conceived as forums + uploads (e.g. [[BSCW]]).
 
Choosing a kind of forum is '''not an innoncent choice''' for an educator, i.e. we believe that "modern" popular Internet Forums like PhPBB are often not suitable for a given pedagogical design. Avoid "boxed" forums, if the goal is to organize discussion and rather use a threaded forums for this. But since threaded forums are almost extinct now, you may have to use a [[News engine]]. Any [[C3MS]] portalware (such as Drupal, Joomla, PostNuke) includes one. In addition, modern Forums have so many features and buttons that untrained teachers and students get lost.
 
Finally, most [[portal]]s including the kind we call [[C3MS]] include integrated forum modules (or are distributed as easy to install plugins). There is also a trend to add functionalities to forum software, so that they became a kind of [[portalware]].
 
== Research questions ==
 
Typical research questions are not necessarily related to the potential media effect per se, par rather related to new instructional designs made easier by the mediaum.
 
; Style and depth of questions
 
Earlier research pointed out that online discussions are generally more equitable and democratic (Harasim, 1990; Levin, Kim & Riel, 1990) and more more reflective and mindful.
[[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] doubts this from his own experience (to expand).
 
; Teacher's role and presence
 
How to design on-line discussions, how to facilitate student discourse. Different teacher roles: E.g. managing, monitoring, help-desk, facilitating...
 
; Effects on student/teacher motivation


Choosing a kind of forum is not an innoncent choice for an educator, i.e. we believe that "modern" popular Internet Forums like PhPBB are often not suitable for a given design, e.g. avoid it if the goal is to organize discussion, rather use a threaded forums for this. But since threaded forums are almost extinct now, you'd have to use a [[News engine]]. In addition, modern Forums have so many features and buttons that untrained teachers and students get lost.


== Pedagogical use ==
== Pedagogical use ==
Line 45: Line 68:
== Software ==
== Software ==


[http://www.phpbb.com/ PhpBB Forum software]  
; "Boxed" web-based forums (usually include some other software, e.g. a chat)
[http://bscw.fit.fraunhofer.de/ BSCW Groupware software - for academics]
* [http://www.phpbb.com/ PhpBB Forum software]
[http://www.bscw.de/ BSCW Groupware software - commercial site]  
* [http://punbb.org/forums/ PunBB] Similar to PhpBB
 
; Groupware where a forum is central
* [[BSCW]] (article in this wiki)


== Links ==
== Links ==


* [http://www.athabascau.ca/html/staff/academic/terrya/Effectiveness_of_E-learning_Presentation_files/v3_document.htm Effectiveness of E-learning: Research Findings] by Terry Anderson
== References ==
* Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Archer, W., & Garrison, R. (2001). “Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing transcripts.” Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network (JALN), 5(2).  [http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm HTML]
* Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. (2001).  \u201cBecoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and ALN. 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 34), no. 1, January 3-6, 2001, Maui, Hawaii.  Available online at: http://computer.org/proceedings/hicss/0981/Volume%201/09811003abs.htm


* Guzdial, Mark & Turns, Jennifer (2000), Effective Discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 437. [http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_3 PDF]


== References ==
* Harasim, L. (Ed.) (1990). Online education: perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger Publishers.
 
* Harasim, L. (1990). “Teaching by computer conferencing.” In A. Miller (Ed.), Applications of computer conferencing to teacher education and human resource development.  Proceedings from an International Symposium on Computer Conferencing, Columbus, Ohio (pp. 25-33).
 
* Hiltz, S.R. (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
 
* Levin, J., Kim, H., &  Riel, M. (1990). “Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks.” In Harasim, L. (Ed), Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185-213).  New York: Praeger.


* Guzdial, Mark & Turns, Jennifer (2000), Effective Discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 437. [http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_3
* Suthers, D. & Xu, J. (2002). Kukakuka: An Online Environment for Artifact-Centered Discourse. In Proceedings of the Eleventh World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), 472-480.


* Suthers, D. & Xu, J. (2002). Kukakuka: An Online Environment for Artifact-Centered Discourse.
In Proceedings of the Eleventh World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), 472-480.


[[Category: Technologies]]
[[Category: Portalware]]
[[Category:Computer-mediated communication]]

Latest revision as of 13:10, 29 June 2010

Definition

  • A forum is a network technology for holding discussions.
  • Original definition of the word: The open public space in the middle of a Roman city, especially the Roman Forum (eg Roman Forum) Wikipedia

Forums have been used long before the World-Wide Web came into existence. E.g. Harasim's well known reader (1990) is based on 1986-1987 workshop and Murray Turoff in the foreword claims "having observed and participated in the evolution of computer-mediated communication (CMC) since the late 1960s.

See also: computer-mediated communication and e-mail

Technical kinds of forums

There are five major families according to functionality

  • Pre-Internet bulletin board systems (BBS)
  • Threaded forums display discussions in threads like "old" UseNet News Forums did.
  • "Boxed" forums display discussions in boxes within boxes (boxes are arranged in linear fashion). These are the most popular today and for reasons Daniel K. Schneider can't quite understand ...
  • Specially enhanced forums for education, like Knowledge forum or a computer-mediated anchored forum (e.g. CaMILE)
  • Groupware systems that were originally conceived as forums + uploads (e.g. BSCW).

Choosing a kind of forum is not an innoncent choice for an educator, i.e. we believe that "modern" popular Internet Forums like PhPBB are often not suitable for a given pedagogical design. Avoid "boxed" forums, if the goal is to organize discussion and rather use a threaded forums for this. But since threaded forums are almost extinct now, you may have to use a News engine. Any C3MS portalware (such as Drupal, Joomla, PostNuke) includes one. In addition, modern Forums have so many features and buttons that untrained teachers and students get lost.

Finally, most portals including the kind we call C3MS include integrated forum modules (or are distributed as easy to install plugins). There is also a trend to add functionalities to forum software, so that they became a kind of portalware.

Research questions

Typical research questions are not necessarily related to the potential media effect per se, par rather related to new instructional designs made easier by the mediaum.

Style and depth of questions

Earlier research pointed out that online discussions are generally more equitable and democratic (Harasim, 1990; Levin, Kim & Riel, 1990) and more more reflective and mindful. DSchneider doubts this from his own experience (to expand).

Teacher's role and presence

How to design on-line discussions, how to facilitate student discourse. Different teacher roles: E.g. managing, monitoring, help-desk, facilitating...

Effects on student/teacher motivation


Pedagogical use

Sorry this part is really under construction and missing ...

Forums are the Computer-mediated communication tool for several reasons:

  • Educational use can be tracked back to the eighties: it's familiar technology associated with a lot of pedagogical knowhow. E.g. a good example for creative forum use are S-Gilly's e-tivities and her E-moderation five-stage model.
  • Any sort of portals, including LMSs provide forums (i.e. the technology is easily available).
  • They behave in some way like mailing lists, therefore most users are somewhat familiar with the technology
  • ....

Local or global ?

When planning a technology-supported curriculum that makes creative use of various technologies (e.g. Wikis, CMSs, activity-based LMSs, content-driven LMSs, simulations), one must decide where to organize various dimensions of tutoring and coaching, e.g. e-tutoring, e-moderation, e-coaching etc..

There are several solutions:

  1. One global forum engine
    • Advantages: One single place to check for new messages, rich features
    • Disadvantage: Users must connect to an other environment, often popular forums have debatable ergonomics, bad integration with course environments and learning tasks
  2. One forum engine par application
    • Advantage: Good integration with most environments
    • Disadvatage: Bad integration with tasks
  3. Discussion for each activity (e.g. Suthers and Xu's (2002) Artifact-centered discourse), e.g. the Discussion page on this Wiki is an example.
    • Advantage: Good integration with the activity
    • Disadvatage: Many places to look for (therefore these forums must have an optional email notification mechanism)

Software

"Boxed" web-based forums (usually include some other software, e.g. a chat)
Groupware where a forum is central
  • BSCW (article in this wiki)

Links

References

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Archer, W., & Garrison, R. (2001). “Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing transcripts.” Journal of the Asynchronous Learning Network (JALN), 5(2). HTML
  • Guzdial, Mark & Turns, Jennifer (2000), Effective Discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 437. PDF
  • Harasim, L. (Ed.) (1990). Online education: perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Harasim, L. (1990). “Teaching by computer conferencing.” In A. Miller (Ed.), Applications of computer conferencing to teacher education and human resource development. Proceedings from an International Symposium on Computer Conferencing, Columbus, Ohio (pp. 25-33).
  • Hiltz, S.R. (1994). The virtual classroom: learning without limits via computer networks. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Levin, J., Kim, H., & Riel, M. (1990). “Analyzing instructional interactions on electronic message networks.” In Harasim, L. (Ed), Online education: perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185-213). New York: Praeger.
  • Suthers, D. & Xu, J. (2002). Kukakuka: An Online Environment for Artifact-Centered Discourse. In Proceedings of the Eleventh World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), 472-480.