Help:Dokeosdays2008: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (using an external editor) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is a resource and follow-up page for: | This is a resource and follow-up page for: | ||
Is there a future for learning management systems ? | : '''Is there a future for learning management systems ?''' (Keynote) | ||
Daniel K. Schneider | : Daniel K. Schneider | ||
TECFA – FPSE - Université de Genève | : TECFA – FPSE - Université de Genève | ||
: [http://www.dokeos.com/en/node/53 Dokeos Users Day] – Geneva – December 4 2008 | |||
Since the emergence of learning management systems (LMS) in the 1960's we have seen many trends. They usually last for about 15 years before they become unpopular, disappear, and then reappear 15 years later in a different form. Internet-based e-learning technology is a synthesis of the 1970's Computer-Based-Training (CBT) and the 1980's Networked Classroom and it is now 13 years old. Statistically speaking, it is almost time to disappear and there are reasons. For example: Today's e-learning systems cannot cope with recent advances in learning design and computer-supported collaborative learning; they represent the antithesis of personal learning environments which are now in strong demand; their authoring model doesn't fit participatory web 2.0 media culture; IMS content packaging standards clash with modern collaborative document production technology. In addition, most LMSs are based on shaky APIs, offer low usability and cannot integrate with modern service-oriented architectures. So, what could be the future of systems like Dokeos ? | Since the emergence of learning management systems (LMS) in the 1960's we have seen many trends. They usually last for about 15 years before they become unpopular, disappear, and then reappear 15 years later in a different form. Internet-based e-learning technology is a synthesis of the 1970's Computer-Based-Training (CBT) and the 1980's Networked Classroom and it is now 13 years old. Statistically speaking, it is almost time to disappear and there are reasons. For example: Today's e-learning systems cannot cope with recent advances in learning design and computer-supported collaborative learning; they represent the antithesis of personal learning environments which are now in strong demand; their authoring model doesn't fit participatory web 2.0 media culture; IMS content packaging standards clash with modern collaborative document production technology. In addition, most LMSs are based on shaky APIs, offer low usability and cannot integrate with modern service-oriented architectures. So, what could be the future of systems like Dokeos ? | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
(available under the default by-nc-sa CC license) | (available under the default by-nc-sa CC license) | ||
* PPTX: | * PPTX: [ | ||
* PDF: | * PDF: | ||
== Follow-up links == | == Follow-up links == | ||
=== Concepts === | |||
; Instructional design models and pedagogies | ; Instructional design models and pedagogies | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
* [[pedagogical scenario]] | * [[pedagogical scenario]] | ||
* Various [[:Category:Pedagogic_strategies|Pedagogic_strategies]] and [[:Category:Instructional design models|Instructional design models]], e.g. [[Community of learning]], [[Project-oriented learning|Project-oriented teaching]], [[Writing-to-learn]], (... many more ...) | * Various [[:Category:Pedagogic_strategies|Pedagogic_strategies]] and [[:Category:Instructional design models|Instructional design models]], e.g. [[Community of learning]], [[Project-oriented learning|Project-oriented teaching]], [[Writing-to-learn]], (... many more ...) | ||
=== Formats === | |||
; E-learning (old style) and its formats | ; E-learning (old style) and its formats | ||
| Line 38: | Line 41: | ||
* [[IMS Learning Design]] | * [[IMS Learning Design]] | ||
; | === Technology === | ||
; Examples of learning design platforms | |||
* [[LAMS]] | * [[LAMS]] | ||
* [[OASIF]] | * [[OASIF]] | ||
| Line 46: | Line 51: | ||
; Personal learning environments and e-portfolios | ; Personal learning environments and e-portfolios | ||
* | * [[learning e-portfolio]] | ||
* [[personal learning environment]]s. | * [[personal learning environment]]s. | ||
* [[ELGG]] | |||
; Web 2.0 | ; Web 2.0 | ||
| Line 53: | Line 59: | ||
* [[Webtop]]s, e.g. [[Pageflakes]], ... | * [[Webtop]]s, e.g. [[Pageflakes]], ... | ||
* [[Rich internet application]]s: e.g. [[e-learning 2.0]], [[virtual office]], [[list of web 2.0 applications]], [[social software]], ... | * [[Rich internet application]]s: e.g. [[e-learning 2.0]], [[virtual office]], [[list of web 2.0 applications]], [[social software]], ... | ||
; Documents | |||
* [[Document standard]] | |||
* [[ELML|eLesson Markup Language]] | |||
* General purpose, e.g. [[DITA]], [[DocBook]] | |||
; SOA-based frameworks | ; SOA-based frameworks | ||
* [[service-oriented architecture]]s like the [[e-framework]] | * [[service-oriented architecture]]s like the [[e-framework]] | ||
[[Category: Courses and workshops]] | [[Category: Courses and workshops]] | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 3 December 2008
This article or section is currently under construction
In principle, someone is working on it and there should be a better version in a not so distant future.
If you want to modify this page, please discuss it with the person working on it (see the "history")
<pageby nominor="false" comments="false"/>
Introduction and abstract
This is a resource and follow-up page for:
- Is there a future for learning management systems ? (Keynote)
- Daniel K. Schneider
- TECFA – FPSE - Université de Genève
- Dokeos Users Day – Geneva – December 4 2008
Since the emergence of learning management systems (LMS) in the 1960's we have seen many trends. They usually last for about 15 years before they become unpopular, disappear, and then reappear 15 years later in a different form. Internet-based e-learning technology is a synthesis of the 1970's Computer-Based-Training (CBT) and the 1980's Networked Classroom and it is now 13 years old. Statistically speaking, it is almost time to disappear and there are reasons. For example: Today's e-learning systems cannot cope with recent advances in learning design and computer-supported collaborative learning; they represent the antithesis of personal learning environments which are now in strong demand; their authoring model doesn't fit participatory web 2.0 media culture; IMS content packaging standards clash with modern collaborative document production technology. In addition, most LMSs are based on shaky APIs, offer low usability and cannot integrate with modern service-oriented architectures. So, what could be the future of systems like Dokeos ?
Slides
(available under the default by-nc-sa CC license)
- PPTX: [
- PDF:
Follow-up links
Concepts
- Instructional design models and pedagogies
- instructional design model
- pedagogic strategy
- pedagogical scenario
- Various Pedagogic_strategies and Instructional design models, e.g. Community of learning, Project-oriented teaching, Writing-to-learn, (... many more ...)
Formats
- E-learning (old style) and its formats
- e-learning
- IMS Content Packaging
- Big players: IMS and SCORM
- Educational modeling languages
Technology
- Examples of learning design platforms
- Portalware
- Poratalware including [[1]] overview, Learning management systems, ...
- Personal learning environments and e-portfolios
- Web 2.0
- Technical: web 2.0, AJAX, web widget, digital identity, ...
- Webtops, e.g. Pageflakes, ...
- Rich internet applications: e.g. e-learning 2.0, virtual office, list of web 2.0 applications, social software, ...
- Documents
- Document standard
- eLesson Markup Language
- General purpose, e.g. DITA, DocBook
- SOA-based frameworks