EduTech Wiki:General disclaimer: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Statement by [[User:DSchneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] (founder and owner), July 2007: | |||
* [[ | * This wiki does not guarantee anything but we try our best to meet our [[EduTech_Wiki:About|objectives]] ... | ||
* Our policy differs from Wikepedia. Articles may refer to speculative research and contain opinions. Therefore, please use your judgement and also consult other sources (most articles contain referens to academic publications) ! | |||
* In addition, many contents are highly provisional (e.g. wrong, unstable, not complete). Usually, authors are encouraged to make sure that a reader gets some information about the status of an article. | |||
I may invent a quality label once I feel that at least a few articles reach full academic standards.... | |||
* Finally, please recall that this wiki's main purpose is not to provide tutorials for the public at large. On July 2007, I think that | |||
this wiki can be used as: | |||
* resource kit for [[educational technology]] teaching; | |||
* [[note taking]] tool for students, researchers and advanced practitioners in educational technology (''you'' write); | |||
* [[literature review]] tool for all interested persons; | |||
* [[writing-to-learn]] environment for students in educational technology and other fields (''you make them write''). | |||
Some materials may be useful to teachers, instructional designers, e-learning consultants, etc. (but it's not the main purpose of this site). | |||
Revision as of 10:46, 12 July 2007
Statement by Daniel K. Schneider (founder and owner), July 2007:
- This wiki does not guarantee anything but we try our best to meet our objectives ...
- Our policy differs from Wikepedia. Articles may refer to speculative research and contain opinions. Therefore, please use your judgement and also consult other sources (most articles contain referens to academic publications) !
- In addition, many contents are highly provisional (e.g. wrong, unstable, not complete). Usually, authors are encouraged to make sure that a reader gets some information about the status of an article.
I may invent a quality label once I feel that at least a few articles reach full academic standards....
- Finally, please recall that this wiki's main purpose is not to provide tutorials for the public at large. On July 2007, I think that
this wiki can be used as:
- resource kit for educational technology teaching;
- note taking tool for students, researchers and advanced practitioners in educational technology (you write);
- literature review tool for all interested persons;
- writing-to-learn environment for students in educational technology and other fields (you make them write).
Some materials may be useful to teachers, instructional designers, e-learning consultants, etc. (but it's not the main purpose of this site).