COAP:COAP-2170/week6: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Monday) |
m (→Homework 6) |
||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
Produce an accessibility review of a website of your choice. I suggest using one of the Webster web sites. | Produce an accessibility review of a website of your choice. I suggest using one of the Webster web sites. | ||
You should at least evaluate the home page plus | You should at least evaluate the '''home page plus two other pages''' (groups do 6 pages or compare 2 websites). | ||
* Use a recognized evaluation grid or tool (e.g. the checklist used in the classroom activity or results produced from a service that checks for WCAG 1 or WCAC 2). | * Use a recognized evaluation grid or tool (e.g. the checklist used in the classroom activity or results produced from a service that checks for WCAG 1 or WCAC 2). | ||
Revision as of 10:29, 3 October 2012
COAP 2170 Week 6 program
Topic: Accessibility
Monday
(Use IE for Windows format or download the video first)
- Introduction (videos and PPT)
- Keeping Web Accessibility in Mind (11.5 min. Flash)
- Experiences of students with Disabilities: Quicktime Windows Media from webaim
- Surfing the Web With a Screen Reader (20 min. AccessIT Video, start a min 4)
- PPT slides from Sharon Trerise, Cornell
- JAWS demo
- Accessibility in User-Centered Design (online book chapter)
- Administration
- Homework 5 questions (if any)
- Mid-Term: Grade average was high (worst grade: B), some doubts about usability testing vs. user surveys
- Principles and players
- The "players": W3C, US gov, some other national programs, corporate (e.g. Microsoft), some universities
Checklists and tools
(for both Monday and Wednesday lessons)
Some important checklists:
- WCAG 2.0 at a glance
- WCAG "quick" ref (official)
- WebAIM's WCAG 2.0 Checklist (A PDF version) .... this is more understandable
- WebAIM's Section 508 Checklist for the Section 508 Standards Guide
- Categories of users
- visual, motor, auditory, seizures, cognitive
- On-line accessibility testing
- TAW3 online checks WCAG 2.0 compliance at all levels. Will provide a written report (English only for some levels)
- WebAim On-line service. (See also the recommended Firefox extension, below)
- Deque Systems on-line service. Will provide a written report.
- Cynthia says (all-in-one service)
- UITest.com. This is an all-in-one service for accessibility, validity and miscellaneous. Enter a URL and the do checking using various other services.
See Accessibility Evaluation Tools at WebAIM and Complete List of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools at W3C for larger lists.
- Designers' web browser extensions (some are alternatives to online tools)
- WebAim Firefox extension Recommended. Click on "Icons key" for explanations of icons and problems encountered.
- Fangs Screen Reader Emulator, Firefox 2.0 -4.0 extension.
- Assistive technology for browsers
- See web accessibility (no need to install assistive technology for this lesson)
- Web developper tools (allow to disable CSS, JS, etc.)
Wednesday
- Administration
- Term project: Each student must post her/his idea for a term project in the world classroom. A few sentences are enough. This activity is not directly graded, but non-participation will affect grade for term project. Deadline: Friday week 6 midnight.
- term project details
- Homework 4 feedback (maybe)
- Classroom activity
Evaluate a website according to some WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) principles. Pick one
(1) WCAG 2.0 is today's most important standard
- WCAG 2.0 Checklist (HTML version)
- WCAG 2.0 Checklist (PDF version)
(2) Older W3C version focusing on content:
(3) US government - section 508 for government websites
- Use an on-line service (see Monday) to help you with this task.
- You can work in teams of two if you like
Homework 6
Produce an accessibility review of a website of your choice. I suggest using one of the Webster web sites. You should at least evaluate the home page plus two other pages (groups do 6 pages or compare 2 websites).
- Use a recognized evaluation grid or tool (e.g. the checklist used in the classroom activity or results produced from a service that checks for WCAG 1 or WCAC 2).
- Doing an analysis at "A" level (i.e. strongly required items) is ok. I don't require analysis at AA or AAA level ....
- Produce a report (you can copy/paste evaluation forms and/or reports from online or other evaluation software).
- Structure of the report: Introduction, findings, conclusion. Findings may include cut/paste data.
- Group work ok: 2 persons max/group, but analyze 6 pages or compare 2 websites.
Due: Wednesday week 7 before class.