« ADID 2: Cours-projet / Dispositif de formation: CARING FOR WATER » : différence entre les versions

De EduTech Wiki
Aller à la navigation Aller à la recherche
(→‎Projet: CARING FOR WATER : ajout-section: Contraintes, avec contenu)
(création et remplissage du tableau: WS competency matrix)
Ligne 68 : Ligne 68 :
AWS competency matrix  
AWS competency matrix  
[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BMvjdhYWOxlhr2ua8zV0UgDedlsC5fay]
[https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BMvjdhYWOxlhr2ua8zV0UgDedlsC5fay]
{| class="wikitable"
|+AWS competency matrix
!Compétence
!Description
!"Knowledge not acquired/required” (Level 1)
!"Basic knowledge, but no competency” (Level 2)
!"Can practice with help” (Level 3)
!"Can do alone” (Level 4)
!"Can train others” (Level 5)
!Required level before course
!Current level
!Expected level for the role
!Gap
!Priority
!Action
|-
|TRAINING TECHNIQUES
|"Training techniques comprises of Trainer's personal qualities, Behavioural and Learning styles, Adults' Learning Process, Presentation skills, Audience management and Learning Evaluation. This Competency is about being able to delivery a successful training by applying these techniques and checking its effectiveness."
|"Knowledge not acquired / required"
|Employee attended to a Train the Trainer session and successfully passed the Learning Evaluation tes. He / she knows the difference about the 4 levels of evaluation (experience, learning, behaviour and impact).
|"Level 2 + Employe is able to recognize his / her own style as a trainer and explore the other styles when necessary. Uses interaction and different activities during the training to motivate and accommodate the different learning styles. Employee applies the Feedback Survey to measure the quality of his / her trainings. Employee is able to design Learning Evaluations to check the training effectiveness (learning and behaviour)."
|"Level 3 + Employee can make an effective presentation by using posture & movement, facial expressions, gestures and voice to achieve the expected result during one presentation. Is able to manage the audience. Employee uses the feedbacks to improve the training material / dynamic as a routine. Employee measures the impact of the training on the business result."
|"Level 4 + Employee is able to teach others on how to teach and measure training effectiveness."
|2
|
|4
|4
|
|
|-
|COACHING TECHNIQUE
|"Everyday Coaching Model's heart is Rapport and it takes into account the process, the necessary skills related to Listening, Questioning, Feedback and Challenge and the roles a Everyday Coach plays: Teacher, Guide and Facilitator. These set of skills are about being able to help others to unlock their potential and improve their performance."
|"Knowledge not acquired / required"
|Employee attended the Every Day Coaching session and successfully passed the Learning Evaluation test.
|Employee is able to run various coaching sessions, mentored by a peer
|Employee is able to run various coaching sessions, on his own. The mentor and manager, or LDV pillar has validated formally the competency
|Employee is a lead coach, level4 + validated as mentor for other coaches
|2
|
|4
|4
|
|-
|GO-SEE-THINK-DO
|Know how to do basic problem solving using the tools in the GSTD template such as check points, problem description, cause and effect diagram, 5 Why's, Action plan, standard improvement, OPL's
|No knowledge of Go-See-Think-Do (GSTD)
|Employee has attended a GSTD training and has acquired theoretical knowledge about basic problem solving
|"Level 2+ Employee has participated in some GSTD's. Follows the methodology, can define the problem statement and can identify some of the root causes, but more root cause analysis is required. The action plan and its follow up to guarantee the sustainability is correctly done."
|"Level 3+ Employee has participated in many GSTD's. Root cause analysis is exhaustive, moreover the employee gained a deep understanding to the problem. In addition to the action plan, he/she knows how to standardise the solutions and makes sure all people involved are communicated and trained and can apply the new standards."
|"Level 4+ Employee can train and coach others on Go-See-Think-Do."
|2
|
|4
|4
|
|-
|MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
|Management of change is one key component of the SH&E Management Systems and needs to be enhanced at all levels. The ability consist in identify when a change is happening and needs to be activated the management of change process.
|No Knowledge about Management of Change
|Employee has attended the training of Management of Change and know the definition on changes and the basic principles and tools to manage changes.
|"Level 2+ Employee can apply the management of change process identifying changes that needs to be analyzed with help and support of key functions."
|"Level 3+ The employee can apply different techniques to analyze changes and propose corrective actions when needed."
|"Level 4+ Employee can teach others about the management of change process on the facility and is able to propose improvements."
|2
|
|4
|4
|
|-
|AWS Standard
|It is required that the employee gets a full understanding and exhaustive view of all elements of the AWS standard
|No knowledge
|Employee has attended the AWS champion training
|Employee is able to integrate an AWS champions team and to take actively part to the various implementation projects
|Employee is able to lead an implementation team, with the help of a qualified peer
|Employee is able to lead an implementation team and mentor other champions
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|AWS step1
|
|No knowledge
|
|
|
|Employee is able to run implementation of AWS standard and conduct related project for his site and can mentor other champions/sites in this process. This includes leadership work with local stakeholders, communication skills.
+ the employee has reached level 5 for each AWS step
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|AWS step2
|
|No knowledge
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|AWS step3
|
|No knowledge
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|AWS step4
|
|No knowledge
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|AWS step5
|
|No knowledge
|
|
|
|
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|PROJETC MANAGEMENT
|It is expected the the ASW champion is able to support his/her site in implementing the projects to reach AWS certification. For this, he/she must get competence in project management and understanding on how to lead different cross functional teams. Project management includes, but is not limited to : objective setting, effectiveness measurement planning, gouvernance implementation, time framing, budget preparation etc.
|No knowledge
|Employee has attended the PM basic training and successfully passed theoretical evaluation
|Employee has been part of project teams, with full responsibility of one aspect of the project
|Employee has been part of at least 3 project teams, with full responsibility of one aspect of the project
|Employee has been leading projects on his own and is used to manage cross functional teams, and/or project teams
|1
|
|5
|5
|
|-
|}


=== Contraintes ===
=== Contraintes ===

Version du 17 mai 2019 à 17:16

Introduction

Sujet: Formation des ambassadeurs de l'initiative Caring For Water → mise en place du standard AWS (standard sur la gestion des ressource eau).

Rôle de ces personnes:

  • Obtenir la certification de leur site pour la conformité au standard AWS (Alliance for Water Stewardship)
  • Trouver les initiatives locales
  • Convaincre les cadres de l’entreprise de réaliser les projets
  • Communication des résultats

Objectif du cours connaître le standard Water StewardShip et initier les projets + communication


Background des personnes visées par la formation:

Personnes désignées par l’entreprise ou volontaires, majoritairement travaillant déjà en environnement ou en communication/public relation

Compétences transversales mobilisées/à développer:

New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology[1]

  • financial literacy
  • Cultural & civic literacy
  • social & cultural awareness
  • critical thinking / problem solving
  • creativity
  • communication
  • collaboration
  • initiative
  • leadership

>>> les distribuer au long des modules, combinées [ou individuellement (??possible, utile, )]

Scénario d'apprentissage: Modalités: Alternance: présence - distance; individuelle - collaborative; synchrone - asynchrone

Modules: Le cours est composé de trois modules principaux

  • Présentation du standard AWS ( présentation du standard + travail sur les step 1-2)
  • Mise en place effective du standard AWS et mesure des effets (Step 3-4 du standard AWS)
  • Communiquer sur les réalisations dans le domaines de la gestion des ressources en eau (Step 5 du standard AWS)


- Icebreaking / cercle de confiance à définir? - Ateliers Collaboratifs par exemple de construire une communication


Besoin de Support Enseignant:

— Feedback/validation sur la proposition de Scénario
— Questions techniques / pédagogiques / vérification de théories etc.


Caring-for-Water_CarteConceptuelle

Projet: CARING FOR WATER

Objectifs visés par la formation

Job description des Champions AWS - Caring for water: [2]

Matrice de compétences

AWS competency matrix [3]


AWS competency matrix
Compétence Description "Knowledge not acquired/required” (Level 1) "Basic knowledge, but no competency” (Level 2) "Can practice with help” (Level 3) "Can do alone” (Level 4) "Can train others” (Level 5) Required level before course Current level Expected level for the role Gap Priority Action
TRAINING TECHNIQUES "Training techniques comprises of Trainer's personal qualities, Behavioural and Learning styles, Adults' Learning Process, Presentation skills, Audience management and Learning Evaluation. This Competency is about being able to delivery a successful training by applying these techniques and checking its effectiveness." "Knowledge not acquired / required" Employee attended to a Train the Trainer session and successfully passed the Learning Evaluation tes. He / she knows the difference about the 4 levels of evaluation (experience, learning, behaviour and impact). "Level 2 + Employe is able to recognize his / her own style as a trainer and explore the other styles when necessary. Uses interaction and different activities during the training to motivate and accommodate the different learning styles. Employee applies the Feedback Survey to measure the quality of his / her trainings. Employee is able to design Learning Evaluations to check the training effectiveness (learning and behaviour)." "Level 3 + Employee can make an effective presentation by using posture & movement, facial expressions, gestures and voice to achieve the expected result during one presentation. Is able to manage the audience. Employee uses the feedbacks to improve the training material / dynamic as a routine. Employee measures the impact of the training on the business result." "Level 4 + Employee is able to teach others on how to teach and measure training effectiveness." 2 4 4
COACHING TECHNIQUE "Everyday Coaching Model's heart is Rapport and it takes into account the process, the necessary skills related to Listening, Questioning, Feedback and Challenge and the roles a Everyday Coach plays: Teacher, Guide and Facilitator. These set of skills are about being able to help others to unlock their potential and improve their performance." "Knowledge not acquired / required" Employee attended the Every Day Coaching session and successfully passed the Learning Evaluation test. Employee is able to run various coaching sessions, mentored by a peer Employee is able to run various coaching sessions, on his own. The mentor and manager, or LDV pillar has validated formally the competency Employee is a lead coach, level4 + validated as mentor for other coaches 2 4 4
GO-SEE-THINK-DO Know how to do basic problem solving using the tools in the GSTD template such as check points, problem description, cause and effect diagram, 5 Why's, Action plan, standard improvement, OPL's No knowledge of Go-See-Think-Do (GSTD) Employee has attended a GSTD training and has acquired theoretical knowledge about basic problem solving "Level 2+ Employee has participated in some GSTD's. Follows the methodology, can define the problem statement and can identify some of the root causes, but more root cause analysis is required. The action plan and its follow up to guarantee the sustainability is correctly done." "Level 3+ Employee has participated in many GSTD's. Root cause analysis is exhaustive, moreover the employee gained a deep understanding to the problem. In addition to the action plan, he/she knows how to standardise the solutions and makes sure all people involved are communicated and trained and can apply the new standards." "Level 4+ Employee can train and coach others on Go-See-Think-Do." 2 4 4
MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE Management of change is one key component of the SH&E Management Systems and needs to be enhanced at all levels. The ability consist in identify when a change is happening and needs to be activated the management of change process. No Knowledge about Management of Change Employee has attended the training of Management of Change and know the definition on changes and the basic principles and tools to manage changes. "Level 2+ Employee can apply the management of change process identifying changes that needs to be analyzed with help and support of key functions." "Level 3+ The employee can apply different techniques to analyze changes and propose corrective actions when needed." "Level 4+ Employee can teach others about the management of change process on the facility and is able to propose improvements." 2 4 4
AWS Standard It is required that the employee gets a full understanding and exhaustive view of all elements of the AWS standard No knowledge Employee has attended the AWS champion training Employee is able to integrate an AWS champions team and to take actively part to the various implementation projects Employee is able to lead an implementation team, with the help of a qualified peer Employee is able to lead an implementation team and mentor other champions 1 5 5
AWS step1 No knowledge Employee is able to run implementation of AWS standard and conduct related project for his site and can mentor other champions/sites in this process. This includes leadership work with local stakeholders, communication skills.

+ the employee has reached level 5 for each AWS step

1 5 5
AWS step2 No knowledge 1 5 5
AWS step3 No knowledge 1 5 5
AWS step4 No knowledge 1 5 5
AWS step5 No knowledge 1 5 5
PROJETC MANAGEMENT It is expected the the ASW champion is able to support his/her site in implementing the projects to reach AWS certification. For this, he/she must get competence in project management and understanding on how to lead different cross functional teams. Project management includes, but is not limited to : objective setting, effectiveness measurement planning, gouvernance implementation, time framing, budget preparation etc. No knowledge Employee has attended the PM basic training and successfully passed theoretical evaluation Employee has been part of project teams, with full responsibility of one aspect of the project Employee has been part of at least 3 project teams, with full responsibility of one aspect of the project Employee has been leading projects on his own and is used to manage cross functional teams, and/or project teams 1 5 5


Contraintes

  • Deux contextes possibles d’utilisation, qui vont dépendre du profil des participants:
—Cours dans le cadre d’une prise de rôle en entreprise.
—Cours ouvert à tout participant intéressé
  • Dans le cadre d’une formation proposée par une entreprise:

Les participants sont donc déjà en emploi. Qu’ils aient manifesté la volonté de devenir champion waters stewardship ou qu’ils aient été désignés volontaires, ce sont des personnes qui ont déjà une occupation professionnelle.

Leur formation se fera dans le cadre de leur travail et donc le temps à y consacrer devrait idéalement être prévu pour se faire pendant les heures officielles de travail et ne pas générer de temps de travail additionnel plus que nécessaire.

En outre, les participants étant potentiellement basés sur des sites géographiquement différents et éloignés, on considère qu’il faut limiter les déplacements liés à des séances présentielles et en tout cas faire en sorte de “grouper” ces cessions.

Il faut garder à l’esprit que en cas de séance en présence, idéalement le bloc ne doit pas durer plus de trois jours.

Références

Avry, S. (2019). Stimuler l’engagement des apprenants. Tiré de Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2011). TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Avry, S. (2019). Utiliser la vidéo. TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Basque, J., Contamines, J., & Maina, M. (2010). Chapitre 8. Approches de design des environnements d'apprentissage. In Apprendre avec les technologies (pp. 109-119). Presses Universitaires de France.

Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3-4), pp. 237-245.

Depover, C., Quintin, J. J., Braun, A., & Decamps, S. (2004). D'un modèle présentiel vers un modèle hybride. Distances et savoirs, 2(1), pp. 39-52.

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. P. A. Kirschner (Ed.). Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL?, Heerlen, Open Universiteit Nederland (pp.61-91).

Hong, S. & Jung, I. (2011). The Distance Learner Competencies: A Three-Phased Empirical Approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 21-42.

Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185.

Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2011). Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Medical teacher, 33(12), 978-982.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), pp. 228-236.

Michinov, N., Primois, C., & Gravey, M. C. (2003). Scénarisation et accompagnement d’une action de formation collaborative à distance: Une illustration de la méthodologie Cl@p. Revue ISDM (InfoComm Sciences for Decision Making) ISDM n°10 (Spécial Colloque TIC), article n°76.

Molinari, G. (2018). Le design pédagogique des environnements informatisés d'apprentissage. TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Molinari, G. (2018). Questions pour une équipe de conception. Tiré de Tricot, A. & Plégat-Soutjis, F. (2003). TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Molinari, G. & Avry, S. (2019). Construire un enseignement numérique : Apprentissage, Scénario, Design. TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Molinari, G. & Avry, S. (2019). Le suivi de l’apprentissage collaboratif : Exemples d’outils d’awareness. TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Molinari, G. & Avry, S. (2019). Les scripts collaboratifs. TECFA, Master MALTT : Cours ADID (Apprentissage Digital et Formation à Distance).

Molinari, G., Avry, S., & Chanel, G. (2017). Les émotions dans les situations de collaboration et d’apprentissage collaboratif médiatisées par ordinateur. Raisons éducatives, (1), 175-190.

Molinari, G. (2011) La visualisation partagée des connaissances individuelles pendant la construction collaborative d’une carte conceptuelle : Quels effets sur l’apprentissage et la perception des connaissances ?. Environnements Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain, Conférence EIAH’2011, 2011, Belgique. pp.341-352. ffhal-00607187

Quintin, J. J., & Depover, C. (2003). Design pédagogique d’un environnement de formation à distance. Éléments méthodologiques. Lidil. Revue de linguistique et de didactique des langues, (28), 31-45.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.

Tricot, A., & Plégat-Soutjis, F. (2003). Pour une approche ergonomique de la conception d'un dispositif de formation à distance utilisant les TIC. Sciences et Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication pour l'Éducation et la Formation (STICEF), 10.