Teachers' well-being: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is under construction. | {{under construction}} | ||
This page is under construction. Author: Gaëlle Molinari | |||
Here a summary of "[https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-well-being_c36fc9d3-en teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis]" | Here a summary of "[https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teachers-well-being_c36fc9d3-en teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis]" | ||
Context | |||
* High expectations of the teachers' skills | |||
* High expectations of | |||
* Changes in their activity (diversity, more administration, less autonomy) | * Changes in their activity (diversity, more administration, less autonomy) | ||
* Stressful working conditions that might affect the quality of instruction and | * Stressful working conditions that might affect the quality of instruction and practices, motivation, self-efficacy and job commitment | ||
* Teacher attribution, an internationally recognized problem | |||
* Lower level of attractiveness of the teaching profession | |||
* Growing teacher shortages | |||
* Higher workload for teachers who are currently working | |||
* Lack of resources causing dissatisfaction | |||
Teachers' well-being | Teachers' well-being | ||
* In this context, occupational well-being as a growing issue to better understand current challenges of the teaching profession | |||
* There is a need to better understand the relationship between working condition, well-being, and quality of instruction | |||
* Empirical evidence on the definition of teachers’ well-being and how to measure it is limited (McCallum et al., 2017) | * Empirical evidence on the definition of teachers’ well-being and how to measure it is limited (McCallum et al., 2017) | ||
====== Four key components ====== | |||
#'''Cognitive well-being''' | |||
#* The set of skills and abilities that teachers need to work effectively | |||
#* Equivalent to cognitive weariness (Van Horn, 2010) | |||
#* Relates to teachers' sense of self-efficacy (a) in classroom management, (b) in instruction, (c) in student engagement | |||
#**<u>Two indicators of cognitive well-being</u> | |||
#*** Capacity to concentrate at work | |||
#*** Self-efficacy | |||
#'''Subjective well-being''' | |||
#*<u>Three elements</u> | |||
#** Life/job satisfaction | |||
#** Positive affect (happiness, joy, contentment) | |||
#** Eudemonia (sense of meaning, purposefulness, goals in life, sense of directness, mindfulness, good psychological functioning, full potential) | |||
#'''Physical and mental well-being''' | |||
#* Good health | |||
#* Stress-related psychosomatic symptoms (frequent headaches, back pain/muscle spasms, insomnia, feelings of loneliness, excess anxiety, increased anger or frustration, increased or decreased appetite, fatigue or social withdrawal) | |||
#'''Social well-being''' | |||
#* Teachers' social capital | |||
#* The quality and depth of the social interactions with students, parents, colleagues, support staff and school leaders | |||
#* Relates to student misbehaviour, issues with parents, support or lack of support from management and leadership, and challenging situations that arise with students | |||
International Summit of the Teaching Profession | |||
* [https://istp2022.es/en/welcome/ 22] | |||
[[Category:Teacher development]][[Category:Research methodology tutorials]] |
Latest revision as of 13:41, 14 April 2023
This article or section is currently under construction
In principle, someone is working on it and there should be a better version in a not so distant future.
If you want to modify this page, please discuss it with the person working on it (see the "history")
This page is under construction. Author: Gaëlle Molinari
Here a summary of "teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis"
Context
- High expectations of the teachers' skills
- Changes in their activity (diversity, more administration, less autonomy)
- Stressful working conditions that might affect the quality of instruction and practices, motivation, self-efficacy and job commitment
- Teacher attribution, an internationally recognized problem
- Lower level of attractiveness of the teaching profession
- Growing teacher shortages
- Higher workload for teachers who are currently working
- Lack of resources causing dissatisfaction
Teachers' well-being
- In this context, occupational well-being as a growing issue to better understand current challenges of the teaching profession
- There is a need to better understand the relationship between working condition, well-being, and quality of instruction
- Empirical evidence on the definition of teachers’ well-being and how to measure it is limited (McCallum et al., 2017)
Four key components
- Cognitive well-being
- The set of skills and abilities that teachers need to work effectively
- Equivalent to cognitive weariness (Van Horn, 2010)
- Relates to teachers' sense of self-efficacy (a) in classroom management, (b) in instruction, (c) in student engagement
- Two indicators of cognitive well-being
- Capacity to concentrate at work
- Self-efficacy
- Two indicators of cognitive well-being
- Subjective well-being
- Three elements
- Life/job satisfaction
- Positive affect (happiness, joy, contentment)
- Eudemonia (sense of meaning, purposefulness, goals in life, sense of directness, mindfulness, good psychological functioning, full potential)
- Three elements
- Physical and mental well-being
- Good health
- Stress-related psychosomatic symptoms (frequent headaches, back pain/muscle spasms, insomnia, feelings of loneliness, excess anxiety, increased anger or frustration, increased or decreased appetite, fatigue or social withdrawal)
- Social well-being
- Teachers' social capital
- The quality and depth of the social interactions with students, parents, colleagues, support staff and school leaders
- Relates to student misbehaviour, issues with parents, support or lack of support from management and leadership, and challenging situations that arise with students
International Summit of the Teaching Profession