Organizational learning: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (types)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


* {{quotation | Organizational learning is the process by which an organization gains new knowledge about its environment, goals,  
* {{quotation | Organizational learning is the process by which an organization gains new knowledge about its environment, goals, and processes. Herbert Simon (1997) posits three ways in which organizations learn: (1) individuals within the organization learn some new fact or procedure, (2) the organization ingests outsiders with knowledge not already in the organization, and (3) the organization incorporates new knowledge into its files and computer systems. As broader organizations, governments and policy-making communities also learn.}} (Smith)
and processes. Herbert Simon (1997) posits three ways in which organizations learn: (1) individuals within the organization learn some  
 
new fact or procedure, (2) the organization ingests outsiders with knowledge not already in the organization, and (3) the organization  
See also: [[change management]], [[knowledge management]], [[expansive learning]], etc.
incorporates new knowledge into its files and computer systems. As broader organizations, governments and policy-making communities also learn.}} (Smith)


== Single loop vs. double loop learning ==
== Single loop vs. double loop learning ==
Line 27: Line 26:
Two paradigms on the nature and processes involved in organizational learning prevail.
Two paradigms on the nature and processes involved in organizational learning prevail.


* The '''technical''' perspective sees organizational learning as the {{quotation | about the effective processing, interpretation of, and  
* The '''technical''' perspective sees organizational learning as the {{quotation | about the effective processing, interpretation of, and response to, information both inside and outside the organization. This information may be quantitative or qualitative, but is generally explicit and in the public domain}} (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)  
response to, information both inside and outside the organization. This information may be quantitative or qualitative, but is generally  
** e.g.: [[#Single loop vs. double loop learning | Single- and double-loop learning]]
explicit and in the public domain}} (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)  
** e.g.: Single- and double-loop learning


* The '''social''' perspective sees organizational learning as {{quotation| the way people make sense of their experiences at work.... learning is something that can  
* The '''social''' perspective sees organizational learning as {{quotation| the way people make sense of their experiences at work... learning is something that can emerge from social interactions, normally in the natural work setting. In the case of explicit information it involves a joint process of making sense of data… The more tacit and ‘embodied’ forms of learning involve situated practices, observation and emulation of skilled practitioners and socialization into a community of practice.}} (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)
emerge from social interactions, normally in the natural work setting. In the case of explicit information it involves a joint process of making sense of data…  
The more tacit and ‘embodied’ forms of learning involve situated practices, observation and emulation of skilled practitioners  
and socialization into a community of practice.}} (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)
** e.g.: [[situated learning]], learning within a [[community of practice]]
** e.g.: [[situated learning]], learning within a [[community of practice]]
== Links ==
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_learning Organizational learning] (Wikipedia)
* [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/org_learning.html Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management], Marting Ryder's list of online resources, University of Colorado.
* [http://www.wzb.eu/gwd/inno/ot_buch/3_3pawbranch.de.htm The Annotated Bibliography of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Creation], WZB Forschung.
* [http://www.infed.org/biblio/learning-organization.htm the learning organization] (summary by [http://www.infed.org/hp-smith.htm Mark K. Smith], 2001.
* [http://www.change-management-toolbook.com/ Change Management Toolbook!] (portal about change management)
* [http://www.brint.com/OrgLrng.htm Knowledge Management, Organizational Learning, and Learning Organizations] (portal)


== References ==
== References ==
* Argyris, C.; Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201001748


* Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
* Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
* Argyris, C. (1993). Beware of Skilled Incompetence,  R&D Innovator Volume 2, Number 10, [http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_index/articles/51-100/article60_body.html HTML reprint].


* Hovland, Ingie, (2003) Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: An International Development Perspective. An Annotated Bibliography, Working Paper 224,Overseas Development Institute, [http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp224.pdf PDF]
* Hovland, Ingie, (2003) Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: An International Development Perspective. An Annotated Bibliography, Working Paper 224,Overseas Development Institute, [http://www.odi.org.uk/publications/working_papers/wp224.pdf PDF]
* Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195092694
* Nonaka, I. and von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective - tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), pp. 635-652.  [http://zonecours.hec.ca/documents/H2010-1-2241390.S2-TacitKnowledgeandKnowledgeConversion-ControversyandAdvancementinOrganizationalKnowledgeCreation.pdf .PDF]


* Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
* Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Line 52: Line 68:
* Smith, M. K. (2001). Learning in organizations. The encyclopedia of informal education. [http://www.infed.org/biblio/organizational-learning.htm]
* Smith, M. K. (2001). Learning in organizations. The encyclopedia of informal education. [http://www.infed.org/biblio/organizational-learning.htm]


[[Category: Innovation and change]]
[[Category: Organization and management]]
[[Category: Organization and management]]

Latest revision as of 18:43, 27 June 2010

Draft

Definition

  • “Organizational learning is the process by which an organization gains new knowledge about its environment, goals, and processes. Herbert Simon (1997) posits three ways in which organizations learn: (1) individuals within the organization learn some new fact or procedure, (2) the organization ingests outsiders with knowledge not already in the organization, and (3) the organization incorporates new knowledge into its files and computer systems. As broader organizations, governments and policy-making communities also learn.” (Smith)

See also: change management, knowledge management, expansive learning, etc.

Single loop vs. double loop learning

Theories on action

Argyris and Schoen's (1974) theories on action describe two aspects that govern individual actions that affect organizational learning.

  • Espoused theory: words used to express what we and what we wish others to understand by our actions
  • Theories-in-use: the implicit mental models and theories we actually use

According to Argyris and Schoen (1974) in organizational learning and practice individuals' mental models regarding what to do in a given situation guide their actions rather than the theories they espouse regarding how they should act.

  • “Argyris (1992) distinguishes between two kinds of organizational learning: single-loop and double-loop learning. Single-loop learning occurs when a mismatch between the intended and actual outcomes of an organizational activity occurs and is corrected without questioning the assumptions or values that gave rise to the actions and their expected outcome.” (Smith)
  • “Double-loop learning occurs when the underlying assumptions or values are questioned by the organization” (Smith)

Single-loop learning is the putting to practice of the accepted principles and strategies (espoused theories) of the organization. Once this fails, double-loop learning is activated. Double-loop learning, by questioning the theories-in-use of an organization, can help an organization adapt and evolve and learn from the situation. (Smith, 2005)

Technical vs. social learning

Two paradigms on the nature and processes involved in organizational learning prevail.

  • The technical perspective sees organizational learning as the “about the effective processing, interpretation of, and response to, information both inside and outside the organization. This information may be quantitative or qualitative, but is generally explicit and in the public domain” (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)
  • The social perspective sees organizational learning as “the way people make sense of their experiences at work... learning is something that can emerge from social interactions, normally in the natural work setting. In the case of explicit information it involves a joint process of making sense of data… The more tacit and ‘embodied’ forms of learning involve situated practices, observation and emulation of skilled practitioners and socialization into a community of practice.” (Easterby-Smith and Araujo 1999, p. 3-5 in Smith 2001)

Links

References

  • Argyris, C.; Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0201001748
  • Argyris, C. (1992). On Organizational Learning. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Argyris, C. (1993). Beware of Skilled Incompetence, R&D Innovator Volume 2, Number 10, HTML reprint.
  • Hovland, Ingie, (2003) Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: An International Development Perspective. An Annotated Bibliography, Working Paper 224,Overseas Development Institute, PDF
  • Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195092694
  • Nonaka, I. and von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective - tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), pp. 635-652. .PDF
  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Smith, Keith, W. () Organization learning, PDF Preprint for Encyclopedia of Governance, Marc Bevir, ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagex).
  • Smith, M. K. (2001). Donald Schön: learning, reflection and change', the encyclopedia of informal education, [1]
  • Smith, M. K. (2001). Learning in organizations. The encyclopedia of informal education. [2]