Talk:Portal: citizen science: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


* Display software also as tables. At this point we also might consider breaking up the page in sub-pages or else add a manual TOC at the beginning. Julien ?
* Display software also as tables. At this point we also might consider breaking up the page in sub-pages or else add a manual TOC at the beginning. Julien ?
* Design a query form or several query forms, e.g. [[Special:RunQuery/Citizen science project query]] shows what we mean by that. - [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] ([[User talk:Daniel K. Schneider|talk]]) 18:56, 16 October 2013 (CEST)


* Get semantic maps to work (right now, only normal maps work...)
* Get semantic maps to work (right now, only normal maps work...)
Line 11: Line 9:
* Fix HTML and CSS to make it 100% (or almost) error free.
* Fix HTML and CSS to make it 100% (or almost) error free.


== Query forms (testing) ==
* Split contents into subpages
 
These should be moved to the page at some point. There are three forms:
 
A parser function link:
* {{#queryformlink:form=Citizen science project query|link text=Query infrastructre, software and participation type}}
 
A wiki link:
* [[Special:RunQuery/Citizen science project query]]
 
Embedded here:
 
 


== test graph ==
* Find a good way to link to query forms and semantic drill down pages.


Allows to check relational consistency and completeness between projects, software and infrastructure (sounds good, doesn't it ?....)
* Add more data visualizations, also add sorting to tables


{{#ask: [[Category:Citizen science project]] OR [[Category:Citizen science infrastructure]] OR [[Category:Citizen science software]]
* See also the [[Portal:_citizen science/testing|testing]] page, e.g. for query forms that are under test !
|?Developed with
|?Has infrastructure
| format=graph
| graphcolor=yes
| graphlink=yes
| nodeshape=box
| graphname=Liens entre modules
| graphlegend=yes
| graphlabel=yes
| graphsize=10,100
| rankdir=LR
}}

Latest revision as of 16:21, 21 November 2013

Desiderata / To do

  • Research team documentation is maybe not good enough: Maybe distinguish between the big project leader, subproject leader and lead developer ? - Daniel K. Schneider (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2013 (CEST)
  • Display software also as tables. At this point we also might consider breaking up the page in sub-pages or else add a manual TOC at the beginning. Julien ?
  • Get semantic maps to work (right now, only normal maps work...)
  • Fix HTML and CSS to make it 100% (or almost) error free.
  • Split contents into subpages
  • Find a good way to link to query forms and semantic drill down pages.
  • Add more data visualizations, also add sorting to tables
  • See also the testing page, e.g. for query forms that are under test !