Learning level: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 42: Line 42:
This taxonomy allows to defined the desired learning level of a target audience and then to develop an appropriate design that will help the learner achieve this desired learning goal.
This taxonomy allows to defined the desired learning level of a target audience and then to develop an appropriate design that will help the learner achieve this desired learning goal.


In addition, this taxonomy (not just this short summary) is useful to build behavioral assessment instruments.
In addition, this taxonomy (not just this short summary) is useful to build behavioral assessment instruments. The "verbs" in the above tell give a hint on what an evaluator should observe.


=== Examples in use ===
=== Examples in use ===
Line 52: Line 52:
Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:
Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:


{{quotationbox |
# signal learning
# signal learning
#* learn how to respond to a signal, like Pavolv's dog
#* learn how to respond to a signal, like Pavolv's dog
Line 68: Line 69:
#* learn to apply rules
#* learn to apply rules
# problem solving
# problem solving
}}


Since Gagne is an instructional designer he then was able to suggest a design model that draws both from behaviorism (lower levels) and cognitivism (higher levels).


== Links ==
== Links ==

Revision as of 14:04, 20 May 2006

Definition

  • Levels of learning refer to competencies a learner can achieve.

Basic distinctions

  • Bruner (1966) distinguishes between passive and active learning, between what we know and what we do with what we know.

Blooms taxonomy

In education, Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives is still the reference regarding detailed competencies that can be achieved through learning, i.e. that can be related to demonstrated skills (outcome-illustrating verbs). Firstly he distinguished among 3 broad categories:

  1. the Cognitive Domain
  2. the Affective Domain
  3. the Psychomotor Domain

Within the Cognitive Domain, Bloom defines 6 levels of intellectual behavior that are important for learning.

  1. Knowledge:
    • Recall data or information
    • Verbs: describe, identify, recall, arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, reproduce state.
  2. Comprehension:
    • Understand the meaning of a problem, be able to translate into own words.
    • Verbs: comprehend, give example, classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, restate, review, select, translate,
  3. Application:
    • Use a concept in a new situation
    • Verbs: apply, change, construct, compute, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice, schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.
  4. Analysis:
    • Can split concepts into parts and understands the structure
    • Verbs: analyze, break down, relate, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.
  5. Synthesis:
    • Produce something from different elements (e.g a report).
    • Verbs: summarize, arrange, combine, categorize, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.
  6. Evaluation:
    • Make judgements, justify a solution, etc.
    • Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate.

This taxonomy allows to defined the desired learning level of a target audience and then to develop an appropriate design that will help the learner achieve this desired learning goal.

In addition, this taxonomy (not just this short summary) is useful to build behavioral assessment instruments. The "verbs" in the above tell give a hint on what an evaluator should observe.

Examples in use

  1. Bloom's Taxonomy for Corrosion Training]
    • This page shows how to apply Bloom's taxonomy to training levels in an engineering program.

Gagne's hierarchy

Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:


  1. signal learning
    • learn how to respond to a signal, like Pavolv's dog
  2. stimulus-response learning
    • learn precise responses to precise signals
  3. chaining
    • lean to to follow procedures
    • able to chain 2 or more stimulus-response
  4. verbal association
    • use terminology in verbal chains
  5. discrimination learning
    • learn how to distinguis between similar stimuli
  6. concept learning
    • singular response to an entire class of stimuli
  7. principle learning
    • learn to apply rules
  8. problem solving

Since Gagne is an instructional designer he then was able to suggest a design model that draws both from behaviorism (lower levels) and cognitivism (higher levels).

Links

References

  • Bloom Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. ISBN 0582280109
  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Driscoll, M.(1991) Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gagne, Robert M. (1975). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Gagne, Robert M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, Harcourt, ISBN 0030636884
  • Gagne, Robert M., Briggs, Leslie, J., Wager, Walter, F. (1985). Principles of Instructional Design, Wadsworth, ISBN 0030347572
  • Wilson, Brent, G. (1997) Reflections on Constructivism and Instructional Design, Preprint for (C. R. Dills and A. A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications. HTML