Help:Bringing classes to EduTechWiki: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Welcome ==
Teacher's from '''related fields''' are encouraged to use this wiki for student writing activities (e.g. in a [[writing-to-learn]] perspective). You also can use this wiki as training ground for advanced English teaching (like [[User:Lamericaana|Sarah Guth]]).
I may intervene if your students do "wild stuff" like choosing weird title (in this case I'd rename and forward from the old one), delete huge chunks of text by mistake (I will revert to old versions), badly format text (I will add structure to an article), etc.
Below a few things that you should read. Also please send [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] a mail if plan to have your students do more than just reading and editing a few small things.
== Wiki culture ==
== Wiki culture ==


Line 29: Line 37:
: Rationale: Helps user navigation
: Rationale: Helps user navigation


; New Article titles must follow the [[Help:Editing_rules editing rules]], i.e.
; New Article titles must follow the [[Help:Editing_rules|editing rules]], i.e.


* not use capital letters
* Avoid use capital letters
* use singular in general
* Use singular in general
* make them not tool long
* Make them as short as possible


: Rationale: Wiki writing is about linking and linking is easier if you just can insert the title of an article in a phrase
: Rationale: Wiki writing is about linking and linking is easier if you just can insert the title of an article in a phrase
Line 39: Line 47:
== Some other remarks ==
== Some other remarks ==


* It's probably a good idea (also for the wiki as a whole) that students understand that a wiki is '''an organized knowledge space''' (not just a collection of isolated articles). You may spend some time explaining how categories work (or give them the [[tagging]] article to read). Then also may discuss the concept of [[hypertext]].
It's probably a good idea (also for the wiki as a whole) that students understand that a wiki is '''an organized knowledge space''' (not just a collection of isolated articles). You may spend some time explaining how categories work (or give them the [[tagging]] article to read). Then also may discuss the concept of [[hypertext]].


* If students wish to be "left alone" a bit while they are working on an article you may tell them to insert a template like this:
If students wish to be "left alone" a bit while they are working on an article you may tell them to insert a template like this:
  <nowiki>{{under construction}}</nowiki>.  
  <nowiki>{{under construction}}</nowiki>.  
E.g. like in [[earning_by_teaching]].
E.g. like in [[learning_by_teaching]].
 
* There is '''no''' prescription on article structure etc. I usually use a similar structure for most articles. But it's a habit, not a rule. They certainly also can reorganize, not just complete.
 
* Students may express opinions (but make it clear)


* Students can '''sign'' articles or sections if they wish (that may help motivation) or can at least add a <pageby/> tag on top of a page like in [[Reflection]]. This may help their motivation.
There is '''no''' prescription on article structure etc. I usually use a similar structure for most articles. But it's a habit, not a rule. They certainly also can reorganize, not just complete.


* Also, if they want to work on something and and existing article seems to be really incompatible, they can just create a new one. But tell them to link the two.
Students may express opinions (but make it clear). They also can '''sign'' articles or sections if they wish (that may help motivation) or can at least add a <pageby/> tag on top of a page like in [[Reflection]]. This may help their motivation.


- Finally please DO NOT WORRY about quality. Most existing articles are not good, nor academic ....  would take me years to do something that is perfect. I rather just went for volume. Btw, you may tell your students to add links to other articles if they are missing :)
Also, if they want to work on something and and existing article seems to be really incompatible, they can just create a new one. But tell them to link the two.


- I may intervene a bit if they really do "wild stuff" like choosing really weird title (in this case I'd rename and forward from the old one), deleting huge chunks of text (by mistake),
Finally please '''do not worry''' about quality. Most existing articles are not good, nor academic ....  would take me years to do something that is perfect. I rather just went for volume.


== Organizing teacher's monitoring ==
== Organizing teacher's monitoring ==

Revision as of 11:21, 13 July 2007

Welcome

Teacher's from related fields are encouraged to use this wiki for student writing activities (e.g. in a writing-to-learn perspective). You also can use this wiki as training ground for advanced English teaching (like Sarah Guth).

I may intervene if your students do "wild stuff" like choosing weird title (in this case I'd rename and forward from the old one), delete huge chunks of text by mistake (I will revert to old versions), badly format text (I will add structure to an article), etc.

Below a few things that you should read. Also please send Daniel K. Schneider a mail if plan to have your students do more than just reading and editing a few small things.

Wiki culture

There is no such thing as wiki culture, but there are very different ones. I (Daniel K. Schneider made) up the initial rules for this one and of course I adapt them to emergining needs. In particular, this wiki doesn't work like Wikipedia. E.g.

  • I own this wiki and I decide, but I am cooperative person ;)
  • You can express opinions, make speculations, create unfinished stuff without worring about quality etc. (just try to give the reader and idea of the status of what he is looking at).

I suggest that you tell them to read (maybe print out a paper copy and them out)

  • Editing rules. Have them respect these more or less ...
  • Basic edition. The really ought to know these. In particular, they should understand titles and links.
  • Template demo (templates are practical ways to format text or add specially formatted information). Wikipedia has hundreds, we only a few.

Then just let them know that some other person may change what they did. Of course, we all should try the best to make good use of everyone's contribution.

Rules I will enforce

(These are simply not negotiable and will take corrective action if needed)

Students must have their wiki homepage filled in

They have insert a description of who they are. It can be very short, e.g. something like this: http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/User:Aleperon http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/User:Andromeda_joy

  • I also suggest that the login they take is something like "Joe Student". This way it's much easier to express opinions, sign articles etc. They just go: "~~~ has the impression that"
Rationale: On the Internet, its important to know who wrote something.
Within an article students must use hierarchical titles

E.g. use "=== section title ===" and not " this is bold

Rationale: Helps user navigation
New Article titles must follow the editing rules, i.e.
  • Avoid use capital letters
  • Use singular in general
  • Make them as short as possible
Rationale: Wiki writing is about linking and linking is easier if you just can insert the title of an article in a phrase

Some other remarks

It's probably a good idea (also for the wiki as a whole) that students understand that a wiki is an organized knowledge space (not just a collection of isolated articles). You may spend some time explaining how categories work (or give them the tagging article to read). Then also may discuss the concept of hypertext.

If students wish to be "left alone" a bit while they are working on an article you may tell them to insert a template like this:

{{under construction}}. 

E.g. like in learning_by_teaching.

There is no prescription on article structure etc. I usually use a similar structure for most articles. But it's a habit, not a rule. They certainly also can reorganize, not just complete.

Students may express opinions (but make it clear). They also can 'sign articles or sections if they wish (that may help motivation) or can at least add a <pageby/> tag on top of a page like in Reflection. This may help their motivation.

Also, if they want to work on something and and existing article seems to be really incompatible, they can just create a new one. But tell them to link the two.

Finally please do not worry about quality. Most existing articles are not good, nor academic .... would take me years to do something that is perfect. I rather just went for volume.

Organizing teacher's monitoring

It's a good idea to come up with a plan to monitor what your students do, but with a minimal amount of work for you.

There are 2 ways and that can be combined:

(1) Require from each student that they list pages they worked on in their wiki home page. In addition you may ask them to write down exactly what they did change;

(2) You can require to add a [[tagging|tag] to each modified page and to each student's home page ,e.g. something like

[[Category: Course Staf-2x]]
  • Make sure that you create the category beforehand, e.g. in your teacher's home page and then edit it (e.g. add a link to your official course page).

Benefits for you are:

  • You quickly can find all students 'and what they worked on
  • You have a Wiki teaching portfolio that you can show

Here is an example from the french version: