Data protection and privacy rules for research

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Draft

Introduction

See also:

General rules in various places

OECD Recommendations for protection of personal data

The OECD recommendations include the following principles, reproduced with identical contents, but different formatting:

Collection Limitation Principle
There should be limits to the collection of personal data and any such data should be obtained by lawful and fair means and, where appropriate, with the knowledge or consent of the data subject.
Data Quality Principle
Personal data should be relevant to the purposes for which they are to be used, and, to the extent necessary for those purposes, should be accurate, complete and kept up-to-date.
Purpose Specification Principle
The purposes for which personal data are collected should be specified not later than at the time of data collection and the subsequent use limited to the fulfilment of those purposes or such others as are not incompatible with those purposes and as are specified on each occasion of change of purpose.
Use Limitation Principle
Personal data should not be disclosed, made available or otherwise used for purposes other than those specified in accordance with Paragraph 9 except:
a) with the consent of the data subject; or
b) by the authority of law.
Security Safeguards Principle
Personal data should be protected by reasonable security safeguards against such risks as loss or unauthorised access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure of data.
Openness Principle
There should be a general policy of openness about developments, practices and policies with respect to personal data. Means should be readily available of establishing the existence and nature of personal data, and the main purposes of their use, as well as the identity and usual residence of the data controller.
Individual Participation Principle
An individual should have the right:
a) to obtain from a data controller, or otherwise, confirmation of whether or not the data controller has data relating to him;
b) to have communicated to him, data relating to him within a reasonable time; at a charge, if any, that is not excessive; in a reasonable manner; and in a form that is readily intelligible to him;
c) to be given reasons if a request made under subparagraphs(a) and (b) is denied, and to be able to challenge such denial; and
d) to challenge data relating to him and, if the challenge is successful to have the data erased, rectified, completed or amended.
Accountability Principle
A data controller should be accountable for complying with measures which give effect to the principles stated above.

EU/EC Rules

The EU has several acts. In particular the Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications and its amending 2009/136/EC), the Directive 95/46/EC on the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and the 2000/520/EC decision on the safe harbour principle.

A new single law is under preparation (as of May 2014).

Read more:

UK

In the UK, the administration of Data Protection is overseen by the Information Commissioner’s Office, which is responsible for the enforcement of the UK Data Protection Act 1998, which is the relevant legislation in force. The provisions of the European Privacy directive are enforced under the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003.

Read more:

France

Directive 95/46/EC is incorporated into French Law Nr. 2004-801 of 6 August 2004 relating to the Protection of Data Subjects as Regards the Processing of Personal Data. Data protection is overseen by the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL)

Switzerland

The Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection 1992 is based on similar principles to the Acts in force in other European countries and received adequacy approval from the EU in 2000.

USA

The US doesn't seem to have any central data protection and privacy law. According to Wikipedia, the Personal Data Privacy and Security Act of 2009 failed because it was opposed a wide range of organizations (e.g. the US Chamber of Commerce, Advertising, Financial services, Internet Commerce, ...). However there are dozens of federal and local laws, plus "case law".

Links

Guidelines

Policy bodies

General