ARCS: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:


See also: [[Flow theory]]
See also: [[Flow theory]]
== Methods ==
The Instructional Material Motivational Survey (IMMS) (Keller, 1993) contains
is a 36 Likert-scale statements. Each statement measures an individual ARCS component.
Huang et al. (2006), published a modified version, which they claim to be more appropriate for studies in higher education. Here is sample of 4 items:
* When I first looked at (M-Tutor), I had the impression that it would be easy for me. (confidence)
* There was something interesting at the beginning of (M-Tutor) that got my attention. (attention)
* Completing the exercises in (M-Tutor) gave me a satisfying feeling of accomplishment. (satisfaction)
* It is clear to me how the content of (M-Tutor) is related to things I already know. (relevance)


== Links ==
== Links ==


* [http://chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebase/strategies/cognitivism/keller_ARCS.htm Attribution Theory and Keller’s ARCS Model of Motivation] by Jerry T. Fernández, George Mason University.
* [http://chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebase/strategies/cognitivism/keller_ARCS.htm Attribution Theory and Keller�$-1��s ARCS Model of Motivation] by Jerry T. Fern�-A�ndez, George Mason University.


* [http://www.netnet.org/instructors/design/goalsobjectives/motivation.htm Motivating Distance Learning Students Using the ARCS Method], a Netnet page
* [http://www.netnet.org/instructors/design/goalsobjectives/motivation.htm Motivating Distance Learning Students Using the ARCS Method], a Netnet page
Line 18: Line 33:
== References ==
== References ==


* J. Keller and T. Kopp, An Application of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design, in C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 289-320, 1987.
* Chang, M. & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: an experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20, 81-98.
 
* ChanMin Kim and John M. Keller. Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students�$(B!G�(B motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x]
 
* Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Introduction to theories of learning and instruction (2nd ed.). In M.P. Driscoll (Ed.), Psychology of learning for instruction (pp. 3-28). Boston, MA:  Allyn and Bacon.
 
* Fritz, Constance (1997), Motivation To Learn,  University of Saskatchewan, Term paper, [http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/Frith/Motivation.HTM HTML], retrieved 22:39, 14 August 2007 (MEST).
 
* Huang, Wenhao; Huang, Wenyeh; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Imbrie, Peter K. (2006). A Preliminary Validation of Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction Model-Based Instructional Material Motivational Survey in a Computer-Based Tutorial Setting, British Journal of Educational Technology, v37 n2 p243-259 Mar 2006.
 
* Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
* Keller, J. and T. Kopp, An Application of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design, in C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 289-320, 1987.
 
* Keller, J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26, 1-7.
 
* Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26, 9/10, 1-8.
 
* Keller, J. M. (1993). Motivation by design. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, Florida.


[[Category:Instructional design models]]
[[Category:Instructional design models]]
[[Category:Affect and motivation]]
[[Category:Affect and motivation]]

Revision as of 22:39, 14 August 2007

Draft

Definition

ARCS is an instructional design model that focuses on motivation

ARCS = Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction


See also: Flow theory

Methods

The Instructional Material Motivational Survey (IMMS) (Keller, 1993) contains is a 36 Likert-scale statements. Each statement measures an individual ARCS component.

Huang et al. (2006), published a modified version, which they claim to be more appropriate for studies in higher education. Here is sample of 4 items:

  • When I first looked at (M-Tutor), I had the impression that it would be easy for me. (confidence)
  • There was something interesting at the beginning of (M-Tutor) that got my attention. (attention)
  • Completing the exercises in (M-Tutor) gave me a satisfying feeling of accomplishment. (satisfaction)
  • It is clear to me how the content of (M-Tutor) is related to things I already know. (relevance)

Links

References

  • Chang, M. & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: an experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20, 81-98.
  • ChanMin Kim and John M. Keller. Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students�$(B!G�(B motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00701.x
  • Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Introduction to theories of learning and instruction (2nd ed.). In M.P. Driscoll (Ed.), Psychology of learning for instruction (pp. 3-28). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Fritz, Constance (1997), Motivation To Learn, University of Saskatchewan, Term paper, HTML, retrieved 22:39, 14 August 2007 (MEST).
  • Huang, Wenhao; Huang, Wenyeh; Diefes-Dux, Heidi; Imbrie, Peter K. (2006). A Preliminary Validation of Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction Model-Based Instructional Material Motivational Survey in a Computer-Based Tutorial Setting, British Journal of Educational Technology, v37 n2 p243-259 Mar 2006.
  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Keller, J. and T. Kopp, An Application of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design, in C. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 289-320, 1987.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987a). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26, 1-7.
  • Keller, J. M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26, 9/10, 1-8.
  • Keller, J. M. (1993). Motivation by design. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University, Florida.