Learning surveys: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
Only one item:
Only one item:
* “On a scale of 0 to 9, how much did you learn in this course, with 0 meaning you learned nothing and 9 meaning you learned more than in any other course you’ve had?”
* “On a scale of 0 to 9, how much did you learn in this course, with 0 meaning you learned nothing and 9 meaning you learned more than in any other course you’ve had?”
=== Learning effectiveness (self-report) ===
Shih-Wei Chou & Chien-Hung Liu define learning effectiveness with four dimensions:
* Performance
* Self-efficacy
* satisfaction
* learning climate
* [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00114.x/full Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective]


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==

Revision as of 19:28, 31 May 2012

Draft

<pageby nominor="false" comments="false"/>

Introduction

The purpose of this page is to create an inventory of some survey instruments that measure perception of learning, learning environments, etc.

Perception of learning and learning environments

The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES)

Scott L. Walker (Curtin university) developed a Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES)

Available:

COLLES

Taylor and Maor (2000) developed an instrument to study on-line environments called the "Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES)

Available:

Perceived learning (Richmond, 1987)

Only one item:

  • “On a scale of 0 to 9, how much did you learn in this course, with 0 meaning you learned nothing and 9 meaning you learned more than in any other course you’ve had?”

Learning effectiveness (self-report)

Shih-Wei Chou & Chien-Hung Liu define learning effectiveness with four dimensions:

  • Performance
  • Self-efficacy
  • satisfaction
  • learning climate

Bibliography

  • Alfred P. Rovai and Kirk T. Barnum, On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning, Journal Of Distance Education/Revue De L’Éducation À Distance, Spring/Printemps 2003, VOL. 18, No 1, 57-73
  • Richmond, V.P., Gorham, J.S., & McCroskey, J.C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M.A. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. cited by Rovai and Barnum (2003).
  • Walker, Scott L., (2003). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES), Curtin University, PhD thesis. Abstract/PDF