User talk:Armel Boudreau

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Revision as of 01:12, 25 September 2014 by Armel Boudreau (talk | contribs) (→‎Screencasting -- ~~~~ -- ~~~~: new section)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to EduTech Wiki!

We hope that you will contribute, in whichever way you like.

You will probably want to consult the help pages and have a look at the Editing rules.

We use strong anti-spamming measures. As soon you are known as a friendly contributor you will be moved to an "author group" that doesn't need to fill in captcha's for each edit. If I don't "see" you, just ask with a post on my discussion page.

Again, welcome!

PS: This is an automatically generated message. Feel free to remove this text from your page. Daniel K. Schneider (talk) 18:16, 23 September 2014 (CEST)

Screencasting -- Armel Boudreau (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2014 (CEST) -- Armel Boudreau (talk) 02:12, 25 September 2014 (CEST)

[TEMPLATE FOR YOUR EDUTECH-WIKI PAGE. DELETE ALL CONTENT BETWEEN []] [Screencasting] [Armel Boudreau, Memorial University of Newfoundland] Definitions and background [In this section, you will write 200 words that define and provide background on the technology. All content must be referenced-i.e. no hypotheses or personal impressions/opinion. Remember this is like an encyclopaedic entry. Write as an essay and not as a list.] Affordances

[In this section, you will write 400 words on the affordances of the learning trend that you have selected. All content must be referenced-i.e., no hypotheses or personal impressions/opinion. Remember this is like an encyclopaedic entry. Use only the peer-reviewed journals prescribed within the course. Write as an essay and not as a list.]

Constraints [In this section, you will write 400 words on the constraints of the learning trend that you have selected. All content must be referenced-i.e. no hypotheses or personal impressions/opinion. Remember this is like an encyclopaedic entry. Use only the peer-reviewed journals prescribed within the course. Write as an essay and not as a list.]] Links [Insert 5 hyperlinks to additional resources that have the name of the technology in the title-these will not be peer-reviewed-i.e. they can be web-pages, YouTube videos, tutorials or any other type of relevant resources. Do not make the http visible-instead insert the title of item to which you are hyper-linking] Works cited [Guerrero, S., Baumgartel, D., Zobott, M. (2013). The use of screencasting to transform traditional pedagogy in a preservice mathematics content course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(2), 173–193. Jones, N., Georghiades, P. & Gunson, J. (2012). Student feedback via screen capture digital video: Stimulating student’s modified action. The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 64(5), 593-607. Lee, M., Pradhan, S. & Dalgarno, B. (2008). The effectiveness of screencasts and cognitive tools as scaffolding for novice object-oriented programmers. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 7(1), 61–80.

Mathieson, K. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of audiovisual feedback via screencasting in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), 143-156.

Mohamad, A., Ahmad, Z., Samsudin, K. &Hassan, M. (2011). Does screencasting teaching software application need narration for effective learning? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 76-82.

Peterson, Elaine. (2007). Incorporating screencasts in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3), 1-4.

Pinder-Grover, T, Green, K. & Millunchick, J. (2012). Impact of screencast technology: Connecting the perception of usefulness and the reality of performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 717-737. Richards, R. (2012). Screencasting: Exploring a middle school math teacher’s beliefs and practices through the use of multimedia technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(1), 55-67. Seror, J. (2013). Screen capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39( 3), 1-16. Seror, J. (2012). Show me! Enhanced feedback through screencasting technology. TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 104-116. Shafer, K. (2010). The proof is in the screencast. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 383–410. Smith, J., Smith, R. (2012). Screen-capture instructional technology: A cognitive tool for designing a blended multimedia curriculum. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 207-228. Sugar, W., Brown, A & Luterbach, K. (2010). Examining the anatomy of a screencast: Uncovering common elements and Instructional Strategies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 1-20.

Tekinarslan, E. (2013). Effects of screencasting on the Turkish undergraduate students & apos: Achievement and knowledge acquisitions in spreadsheet applications. Journal of Information Technology Education, 12(1), 271-282. Veronikas, S. & Maushak, N. (2005). Effectiveness of audio on screen captures in software application instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(2), 199-205.

Yee, K. & Hargis, J. (2010). Screencasts. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 9-12. ]