Web 2.0: Difference between revisions
(using an external editor) |
(using an external editor) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
According to Tim O'Reilly (2005), Web 2.0 can be defined through examples of how typical web services did evolve. E.g. | According to Tim O'Reilly (2005), Web 2.0 can be defined through examples of how typical web services did evolve. E.g. | ||
<table><tr> | <table> | ||
<tr> | |||
<th>Web 1.0 (past)</th> | <th>Web 1.0 (past)</th> | ||
<th>Web 2.0 (future)</th> | <th>Web 2.0 (future)</th> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>Photo-albums</td> | ||
<td>Flickr-like albums</td> | <td>Flickr-like albums</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>FTP or http-based downloads</td> | ||
<td>BitTorrent</td> | <td>BitTorrent</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>mp3.com</td> | ||
<td>Napster</td> | <td>Peer-to-peer solutions, like Napster</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>Britannica Online</td> | ||
<td>Wikipedia</td> | <td>Wikipedia</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>personal websites</td> | ||
<td>blogging</td> | <td>blogging</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>publishing</td> | ||
<td>participation</td> | <td>participation</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>content management systems</td> | ||
<td>wikis</td> | <td>wikis</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>directories (taxonomy)</td> | ||
<td>tagging ("folksonomy")</td> | <td>tagging ("folksonomy")</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
< | <td>stickiness</td> | ||
<td>syndication</td> | <td>syndication</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</ | </table> | ||
What is common about these example is that {{quotation | behind the success of the giants born in the Web 1.0 era who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence}} (O'Reilly, 2005), in other words Web 2.0 is strongly related to [[social computing]] and [[collective intelligence]] (the "wisdom of the crowd"). | What is common about these example is that {{quotation | behind the success of the giants born in the Web 1.0 era who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence}} (O'Reilly, 2005), in other words Web 2.0 is strongly related to [[social computing]] and [[collective intelligence]] (the "wisdom of the crowd"). | ||
A few years ago, there was a lot of talk about the [[semantic web]]. This didn't happen so far ;). So more and more it appears that Web 2.0 means actually going back to the roots of academic Internet in the 80' and very early 90' which was all about communication and exchange. | A few years ago, there was a lot of talk about the [[semantic web]]. This didn't happen so far ;). So more and more it appears that Web 2.0 means actually going back to the roots of academic Internet in the 80' and very early 90' which was all about communication and exchange. | ||
In addition Web 2.0 is related to enhanced user experience and webservices standards and APIs that allow for more collaboration between machines. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 14 September 2006
Definition
Web 2.0 is one of those "buzz words" like DHTML that do not have a clear meaning but does refer to a trend or practise that does favor new technologies.
According to Tim O'Reilly (2005), Web 2.0 can be defined through examples of how typical web services did evolve. E.g.
| Web 1.0 (past) | Web 2.0 (future) |
|---|---|
| Photo-albums | Flickr-like albums |
| FTP or http-based downloads | BitTorrent |
| mp3.com | Peer-to-peer solutions, like Napster |
| Britannica Online | Wikipedia |
| personal websites | blogging |
| publishing | participation |
| content management systems | wikis |
| directories (taxonomy) | tagging ("folksonomy") |
| stickiness | syndication |
What is common about these example is that “behind the success of the giants born in the Web 1.0 era who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence” (O'Reilly, 2005), in other words Web 2.0 is strongly related to social computing and collective intelligence (the "wisdom of the crowd").
A few years ago, there was a lot of talk about the semantic web. This didn't happen so far ;). So more and more it appears that Web 2.0 means actually going back to the roots of academic Internet in the 80' and very early 90' which was all about communication and exchange.
In addition Web 2.0 is related to enhanced user experience and webservices standards and APIs that allow for more collaboration between machines.
References
- O'Reilly, Tim, What Is Web 2.0 - Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, [ http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html HTML]
- Spool, Jared M., Web 2.0: The Power Behind the Hype, HTML