Learning level: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


'''Levels of learning'''  
* '''Levels of learning''' refer to competencies a learner can achieve.


== Levels of learning ==
* Defining levels of learning is one of key tasks in [[instructional design]]
 
== Basic distinctions ==
 
* Bruner (1966) distinguishes between passive and active learning, between what we know and what we do with what we know.
 
 
== Blooms taxonomy ==


In education, Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives is still the reference regarding detailed competencies that can be achieved through learning, i.e. that can be related to demonstrated skills (outcome-illustrating verbs). Firstly he distinguished among 3 broad categories:
In education, Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives is still the reference regarding detailed competencies that can be achieved through learning, i.e. that can be related to demonstrated skills (outcome-illustrating verbs). Firstly he distinguished among 3 broad categories:
Line 33: Line 40:
#* Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate.
#* Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate.


=== Examples in use ===
# [http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Training/Bloom.htm Bloom's Taxonomy for Corrosion Training]]
#* This page shows how to apply Bloom's taxonomy to training levels in an engineering program.
== Gagne's hierarchy ==


Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:
Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:
Line 53: Line 65:
# problem solving
# problem solving


== Examples in use ==
# [http://www.corrosion-doctors.org/Training/Bloom.htm Bloom's Taxonomy for Corrosion Training]]
#* This page shows how to apply Bloom's taxonomy to training levels in an engineering program.


== Links ==
== Links ==
Line 67: Line 76:


== References ==
== References ==
* Bloom Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. ISBN 0582280109
* Bloom Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. ISBN 0582280109
* Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.


* Driscoll, M.(1991) Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Allyn and Bacon.
* Driscoll, M.(1991) Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Allyn and Bacon.
Line 76: Line 88:


* Gagne, Robert M., Briggs, Leslie, J., Wager, Walter, F. (1985). Principles of Instructional Design, Wadsworth, ISBN 0030347572
* Gagne, Robert M., Briggs, Leslie, J., Wager, Walter, F. (1985). Principles of Instructional Design, Wadsworth, ISBN 0030347572
* Wilson, Brent, G. (1997) Reflections on Constructivism and Instructional Design, Preprint for (C. R. Dills and A. A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications. [http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/construct.html HTML]


[[Category:Learning theories]]
[[Category:Learning theories]]
[[Category:Educational theories]]
[[Category:Educational theories]]

Revision as of 12:51, 20 May 2006

Definition

  • Levels of learning refer to competencies a learner can achieve.

Basic distinctions

  • Bruner (1966) distinguishes between passive and active learning, between what we know and what we do with what we know.


Blooms taxonomy

In education, Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives is still the reference regarding detailed competencies that can be achieved through learning, i.e. that can be related to demonstrated skills (outcome-illustrating verbs). Firstly he distinguished among 3 broad categories:

  1. the Cognitive Domain
  2. the Affective Domain
  3. the Psychomotor Domain

Within the Cognitive Domain, Bloom defines 6 levels of intellectual behavior that are important for learning.

  1. Knowledge:
    • Recall data or information
    • Verbs: describe, identify, recall, arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, reproduce state.
  2. Comprehension:
    • Understand the meaning of a problem, be able to translate into own words.
    • Verbs: comprehend, give example, classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, restate, review, select, translate,
  3. Application:
    • Use a concept in a new situation
    • Verbs: apply, change, construct, compute, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice, schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.
  4. Analysis:
    • Can split concepts into parts and understands the structure
    • Verbs: analyze, break down, relate, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.
  5. Synthesis:
    • Produce something from different elements (e.g a report).
    • Verbs: summarize, arrange, combine, categorize, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.
  6. Evaluation:
    • Make judgements, justify a solution, etc.
    • Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate.

Examples in use

  1. Bloom's Taxonomy for Corrosion Training]
    • This page shows how to apply Bloom's taxonomy to training levels in an engineering program.

Gagne's hierarchy

Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:

  1. signal learning
    • learn how to respond to a signal, like Pavolv's dog
  2. stimulus-response learning
    • learn precise responses to precise signals
  3. chaining
    • lean to to follow procedures
    • able to chain 2 or more stimulus-response
  4. verbal association
    • use terminology in verbal chains
  5. discrimination learning
    • learn how to distinguis between similar stimuli
  6. concept learning
    • singular response to an entire class of stimuli
  7. principle learning
    • learn to apply rules
  8. problem solving


Links

References

  • Bloom Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. ISBN 0582280109
  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Driscoll, M.(1991) Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gagne, Robert M. (1975). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Gagne, Robert M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, Harcourt, ISBN 0030636884
  • Gagne, Robert M., Briggs, Leslie, J., Wager, Walter, F. (1985). Principles of Instructional Design, Wadsworth, ISBN 0030347572
  • Wilson, Brent, G. (1997) Reflections on Constructivism and Instructional Design, Preprint for (C. R. Dills and A. A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications. HTML