Assessment of music students: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Various PHD thesis sponsored by [http://www.smartmusic.com/Educators/Research.aspx SmartMusic] | * Various PHD thesis sponsored by [http://www.smartmusic.com/Educators/Research.aspx SmartMusic] | ||
* [http://www.akronschools.com/departments/ci/teaching-and-learning/fine-arts/music/teacher-resources/file-downloads/musichandbook2011-2012.pdf Akron Public Schools 2011-2012 Music Handbook] (Includes some lesson plans and rules/tips for assessment, use search and look at forms at the end) | |||
== Bibliography == | == Bibliography == | ||
* Asmus, E. P. (1999). Music assessment concepts. Music Educators Journal, 86(2), 19-23. | * Asmus, E. P. (1999). Music assessment concepts. Music Educators Journal, 86(2), 19-23. | ||
* Brophy, T. S. (2000) Assessing the Developing Child Musician: A Guide for Music Teachers | |||
* Colwell, R. (2003). The status of arts assessment: Examples from music. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), 11-18. | * Colwell, R. (2003). The status of arts assessment: Examples from music. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), 11-18. | ||
* Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds.). (2002) The new handbook of research on music | |||
teaching and learning. New York: Oxford University Press | |||
* Edmund, D. C., Birkner, M. E., Burcham, R. W., & Heffner, C. J. (2008). Identifying key issues for assessment in music education. In T.S. Brophy (Ed.), Assessment in Music Education: Integrating Curriculum Theory, and Practice. Proceedings of the 2007 Florida Symposium on Assessment in Music Education (pp. 45-55). Chicago: Gia. | * Edmund, D. C., Birkner, M. E., Burcham, R. W., & Heffner, C. J. (2008). Identifying key issues for assessment in music education. In T.S. Brophy (Ed.), Assessment in Music Education: Integrating Curriculum Theory, and Practice. Proceedings of the 2007 Florida Symposium on Assessment in Music Education (pp. 45-55). Chicago: Gia. |
Revision as of 17:05, 15 September 2011
This entry should include various evaluation methods at some point.
Jazz piano students evaluation
- Bradley Sowash, in a forum message identified four big dimensions: Rhythm, Scales, Harmony and Play.
Links
- jazz piano lessons / new students Evaluation grid by Bradley Sowash posted on july 2011 at pianoworld.
- Various PHD thesis sponsored by SmartMusic
- Akron Public Schools 2011-2012 Music Handbook (Includes some lesson plans and rules/tips for assessment, use search and look at forms at the end)
Bibliography
- Asmus, E. P. (1999). Music assessment concepts. Music Educators Journal, 86(2), 19-23.
- Brophy, T. S. (2000) Assessing the Developing Child Musician: A Guide for Music Teachers
- Colwell, R. (2003). The status of arts assessment: Examples from music. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), 11-18.
- Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds.). (2002) The new handbook of research on music
teaching and learning. New York: Oxford University Press
- Edmund, D. C., Birkner, M. E., Burcham, R. W., & Heffner, C. J. (2008). Identifying key issues for assessment in music education. In T.S. Brophy (Ed.), Assessment in Music Education: Integrating Curriculum Theory, and Practice. Proceedings of the 2007 Florida Symposium on Assessment in Music Education (pp. 45-55). Chicago: Gia.
- Fisher, Ryan (2008). Debating Assessment in Music Education, Research & Issues In Music Education, September 2008 : Volume 6 : No. 1 HTML (open access, the initial bibliography items were found in this article).
- Russel, Joshua, A. (2010). Assessment Practices of Secondary Music Teachers, Journal of Research in Music Education April 2010 vol. 58 no. 1 37-54, doi: 10.1177/0022429409360062
- Orzolek, D. C. (2006). The paradox of assessment: Assessment as paradox [Electronic version]. Research and Issues in Music Education, 4. Retrieved Sept. 2011 from http://www.stthomas.edu/rimeonline/vol4/orzolek.htm
- Sheldon, Deborah., Reese, S., & Grashel, J. (1999). The effects of live accompaniment, intelligent digital accompaniment, and no accompaniment on musicians’ performance quality. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 251-288.
- Journals