Team learning: Difference between revisions
m (using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
'''Team learning''' | '''Team learning''' | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Different strategies: | Different strategies: | ||
# Heterogeneous Groups according to several criteria, e.g. according to background in subject matters, or geographic / ethnic / gender, or learning styles. However, make sure not to have a sole "minority person" in a group. | # Heterogeneous Groups: Selection of students according to several criteria, e.g. according to background in subject matters, or geographic / ethnic / gender, or learning styles. However, make sure not to have a sole "minority person" in a group. | ||
# Random assignment. | |||
# By interest, e.g. topics, future career plans, etc. | |||
{{quotation | Teams which have similar membership often function more quickly and efficiently than heterogeneous groups, but heterogeneous teams can be more innovative in the long run.}} ([http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/teams/manage/grouping.html], {{retr}}) | |||
{{quotation | Teams which have similar membership often function more quickly and efficiently than | |||
=== Team stability === | === Team stability === | ||
Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
== Research Issues == | == Research Issues == | ||
=== When are groups effective ? === | |||
=== Can team skills be taught ?=== | === Can team skills be taught ?=== | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
* [http://www.foundationcoalition.org/home/keycomponents/student_teams.html Student Teams in Engineering] This | * [http://www.foundationcoalition.org/home/keycomponents/student_teams.html Student Teams in Engineering] This Web page from the engineering education [http://www.foundationcoalition.org Foundation Coalition] has several interesting documents for teachers. | ||
* [http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/teams/ Building Blocks for Teams], Teaching and Learning with Technology, PennState. Good site with practical advice. | * [http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/teams/ Building Blocks for Teams], Teaching and Learning with Technology, PennState. Good site with practical advice. | ||
* [http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/leaders/faq.htm#ten Frequently Asked Questions] of the Wharton Leadership Program. Addresses some team forming/management issues. | * [http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/leaders/faq.htm#ten Frequently Asked Questions] of the Wharton Leadership Program. Addresses some team forming/management issues. | ||
* [http://www.enme.umd.edu/labs/BESTEAMS/ BESTTEAMS], (Building Engineering Student Team Effectiveness and Management Systems project) at University of Maryland. This site has teaching materials for download. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 60: | Line 62: | ||
* Michaelson, Larry K. (1999) "Myths And Methods In Successful Small Group Work." National Teaching and Leaning Forum, Vol. 8, #6 | * Michaelson, Larry K. (1999) "Myths And Methods In Successful Small Group Work." National Teaching and Leaning Forum, Vol. 8, #6 | ||
=== Research === | === Research === | ||
* Okudan, G.E., Horner, D. and Russell, M. (2001) Achieving High Performing Engineering Design Teams: A Curriculum Intervention Study, Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Education. [http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2001/Proceedings/papers/529.pdf PDF] | * Okudan, G.E., Horner, D. and Russell, M. (2001) Achieving High Performing Engineering Design Teams: A Curriculum Intervention Study, Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Education. [http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2001/Proceedings/papers/529.pdf PDF] | ||
Okudan, G.E., Horner, D., Bogue, B., Devon, R. and Russell, M. (2002) An Investigation of Gender Composition on Integrated Project Team Performance: Part II, Proceedings, ASEE International Colloquium on Engineering Education. [http://www.asee.org/international/INTERTECH2002/217.pdf PDF] | |||
* Seat, E. and Lord, S. (1999)"Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills," Journal on Engineering Education, 88(4), 385-390 | |||
[[Category: Instructional design models]] | [[Category: Instructional design models]] | ||
[[Category: Pedagogic strategies]] | [[Category: Pedagogic strategies]] |
Revision as of 13:51, 18 September 2006
Team learning
Team building
According to the Building Blocks for Teams Web Site there are few recommendations:
Number of students
- In engineering education, a team is usually composed by 4-5 people, because that is small enough for everyone to communicate, but large enough to have genuine team dynamics. 7-8 participants seems to be maximum, pairs (2) the minimum.
Mix of students
- Most experts agree that students should not form teams by themselves, since within the team clique-building increases and conversely exclusions of some.
Different strategies:
- Heterogeneous Groups: Selection of students according to several criteria, e.g. according to background in subject matters, or geographic / ethnic / gender, or learning styles. However, make sure not to have a sole "minority person" in a group.
- Random assignment.
- By interest, e.g. topics, future career plans, etc.
“Teams which have similar membership often function more quickly and efficiently than heterogeneous groups, but heterogeneous teams can be more innovative in the long run.” ([1], retrieved, 17:17, 15 September 2006 (MEST))
Team stability
As a general rule, teams should remain stable throughout a project. However there are exceptions:
- “One exception could be if your class does relatively short projects with pairs or small teams. In that case, it could be advantageous to rotate members so students are exposed to more viewpoints.” ([2] retrieved, 17:17, 15 September 2006 (MEST))
- Sophisticated CSCL models may have rotation schemes so that knowledge can spread through a whole class. (add Ninck's model here.)
The role of technology
Research Issues
When are groups effective ?
Can team skills be taught ?
According to Okudan (2001) “it was proposed that the high performing team skills training and education could improve the performance of student design teams.”. Half of an engineering class received three two-hour training, but globally the results have not been found significant and the authors call for more research that also try out different more in depth-training.
Links
- Student Teams in Engineering This Web page from the engineering education Foundation Coalition has several interesting documents for teachers.
- Building Blocks for Teams, Teaching and Learning with Technology, PennState. Good site with practical advice.
- Frequently Asked Questions of the Wharton Leadership Program. Addresses some team forming/management issues.
- BESTTEAMS, (Building Engineering Student Team Effectiveness and Management Systems project) at University of Maryland. This site has teaching materials for download.
References
Practical
- Breslow, Lori, Teaching Teamwork Skills - Part 1, TLL Library, Vol. X, No. 4, January/February 1998 HTML
- Breslow, Lori, Teaching Teamwork Skills - Part 2, TLL Library, Vol. X. No. 5, March/April 1998. HTML
- Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (1992) Wisdom of Teams, Harvard Business School Press
- Issacs, Geoff. (2000) "'Group Assessment' - Assessment of Students on Group-Based Tasks - Issues and Options" A Report for the Queensland Teaching and Learning Committee.
- Michaelson, Larry K. (1999) "Myths And Methods In Successful Small Group Work." National Teaching and Leaning Forum, Vol. 8, #6
Research
- Okudan, G.E., Horner, D. and Russell, M. (2001) Achieving High Performing Engineering Design Teams: A Curriculum Intervention Study, Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering Education. PDF
Okudan, G.E., Horner, D., Bogue, B., Devon, R. and Russell, M. (2002) An Investigation of Gender Composition on Integrated Project Team Performance: Part II, Proceedings, ASEE International Colloquium on Engineering Education. PDF
- Seat, E. and Lord, S. (1999)"Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills," Journal on Engineering Education, 88(4), 385-390