Learning level: Difference between revisions
m (using an external editor) |
m (using an external editor) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Within the Cognitive Domain, Bloom defines 6 levels of intellectual behavior that are important for learning. | Within the Cognitive Domain, Bloom defines 6 levels of intellectual behavior that are important for learning. | ||
{{quotationbox | | |||
# Knowledge: | # Knowledge: | ||
#* Recall data or information | #* Recall data or information | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
#* Make judgements, justify a solution, etc. | #* Make judgements, justify a solution, etc. | ||
#* Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate. | #* Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate. | ||
}} | |||
This taxonomy allows to defined the desired learning level of a target audience and then to develop an appropriate design that will help the learner achieve this desired learning goal. | |||
In addition, this taxonomy (not just this short summary) is useful to build behavioral assessment instruments. | |||
=== Examples in use === | === Examples in use === |
Revision as of 13:02, 20 May 2006
Definition
- Levels of learning refer to competencies a learner can achieve.
- Defining levels of learning is one of key tasks in instructional design
Basic distinctions
- Bruner (1966) distinguishes between passive and active learning, between what we know and what we do with what we know.
Blooms taxonomy
In education, Blooms taxonomy of educational objectives is still the reference regarding detailed competencies that can be achieved through learning, i.e. that can be related to demonstrated skills (outcome-illustrating verbs). Firstly he distinguished among 3 broad categories:
- the Cognitive Domain
- the Affective Domain
- the Psychomotor Domain
Within the Cognitive Domain, Bloom defines 6 levels of intellectual behavior that are important for learning.
- Knowledge:
- Recall data or information
- Verbs: describe, identify, recall, arrange, define, duplicate, label, list, memorize, name, order, recognize, reproduce state.
- Comprehension:
- Understand the meaning of a problem, be able to translate into own words.
- Verbs: comprehend, give example, classify, describe, discuss, explain, express, identify, indicate, locate, recognize, report, restate, review, select, translate,
- Application:
- Use a concept in a new situation
- Verbs: apply, change, construct, compute, choose, demonstrate, dramatize, employ, illustrate, interpret, operate, practice, schedule, sketch, solve, use, write.
- Analysis:
- Can split concepts into parts and understands the structure
- Verbs: analyze, break down, relate, appraise, calculate, categorize, compare, contrast, criticize, differentiate, discriminate, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, test.
- Synthesis:
- Produce something from different elements (e.g a report).
- Verbs: summarize, arrange, combine, categorize, assemble, collect, compose, construct, create, design, develop, formulate, manage, organize, plan, prepare, propose, set up, write.
- Evaluation:
- Make judgements, justify a solution, etc.
- Verbs: appraise, interpret, argue, assess, attach, compare, defend, estimate, judge, predict, rate, core, select, support, value, evaluate.
This taxonomy allows to defined the desired learning level of a target audience and then to develop an appropriate design that will help the learner achieve this desired learning goal.
In addition, this taxonomy (not just this short summary) is useful to build behavioral assessment instruments.
Examples in use
- Bloom's Taxonomy for Corrosion Training]
- This page shows how to apply Bloom's taxonomy to training levels in an engineering program.
Gagne's hierarchy
Gage (1965 ?) also postulated a hierarchy of eight different learning types:
- signal learning
- learn how to respond to a signal, like Pavolv's dog
- stimulus-response learning
- learn precise responses to precise signals
- chaining
- lean to to follow procedures
- able to chain 2 or more stimulus-response
- verbal association
- use terminology in verbal chains
- discrimination learning
- learn how to distinguis between similar stimuli
- concept learning
- singular response to an entire class of stimuli
- principle learning
- learn to apply rules
- problem solving
Links
- [Kearsley's TIP] Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database
- This is one of the best sources on Learning Theory.
- Bloom's Taxonomy
- Learning Domains or Bloom's Taxonomy
- Major Categories in the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Bloom 1956)
- Robert Gagne
- Applying Learning Theories to Online Instructional Design
References
- Bloom Benjamin S. and David R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, Longmans, Green, 1956. ISBN 0582280109
- Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Driscoll, M.(1991) Psychology of Learning for Instruction: Allyn and Bacon.
- Gagne, Robert M. (1975). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Gagne, Robert M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, Harcourt, ISBN 0030636884
- Gagne, Robert M., Briggs, Leslie, J., Wager, Walter, F. (1985). Principles of Instructional Design, Wadsworth, ISBN 0030347572
- Wilson, Brent, G. (1997) Reflections on Constructivism and Instructional Design, Preprint for (C. R. Dills and A. A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications. HTML