Wiki-supported project-oriented learning: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


Below are some suggestions that need to be adapted to your needs.  
Below are some suggestions that need to be adapted to your needs.  
* This model has been tested in 2006 with a university-level class in history of deviant social behavior. Both teacher and students didn't have much exposure to Internet technology.
* [[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] helped designing the course (2h of work) and then sometimes met with the teacher and the class. All in all it rather was a "low cost" operation and no systematic observation / evaluation was performed.


The model has four stages:
=== Context ===


=== Preparation ====
* This model has been tested in 2006 with a semester-long undergraduate class in history of deviant social behavior. Both teacher and students didn't have much exposure to Internet technology.
 
=== Preparation and wiki training ===
 
* [[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] helped designing the course (2h of work) and then sometimes met with the teacher and the class. All in all it rather was a "low cost" operation and no systematic observation was performed. Evaluation by students was "ok", but some complained about the workload.
* Students received less then half an hour of wiki training in the beginning and a short help text including short editorial guidelines were prepared. Most students ignored some important features of the wiki, e.g. some didn't really undestand how links work, why one should use titles, how to organize a discussion page, etc. A few forget to save articles from time to time and lost stuff, because they didn't know how to copy/paste after an editing timeout and this created some frustrations. The overall result (wiki pages) however was acceptable, but [[User:DSchneider|DSchneider]] believes that some more training couldn't hurt ...
 
=== Stages ===
The model has four stages.
 
;(1) Preparation


* Teacher defines global course topic
* Teacher defines global course topic
Line 22: Line 30:
* Student teams (5 to 7 members) are formed according to their interests (each student had to write a short text in the wiki)
* Student teams (5 to 7 members) are formed according to their interests (each student had to write a short text in the wiki)


=== Planning ===
;(2) Planning
 
* Team members search resources, start some reading
* Students write the initial specification of the project, for example goals and questions.
* Students add some planning elements: Rough definition of tasks (work packages) and important milestones.
* Teacher gives feedback and students revise the project plan (at least 2 times)
 
Note each team uses
* A single ''project / research plan page''.
* A page for the paper (i.e. the ''research''
* Other pages for shared activities (see below)
 
;(3a) Implementation of the research project
 
* Students were set to work on their project. More or less informal deadlines have been set for important milestones.
* After some initial fieldwork (interviews/reading documents) students were asked to present their research methods (this is somewhat particular to history). Also, sometimes students made adjustements to the plan themselves.
* Teachers insures that some cooperation (either off-line or on-line happens). Some presential classes have been cancelled and replaced by meeting time for students.
* Once per week teacher gave feedback in the wiki (mostly in discussion pages).
* Repeat the previsous steps until all milestones are met and/or the course end approaches
 
; (3b) Other activities
Students also were asked to:
* Work on a common bibliography
* A dictionary of terms
 
;(4) Finalization
* It was required that final project (a long wiki page) somewhat met academic standards
* Each group had to present result to class and then make some adjustments
* Grades and the whole experience are discussed in a final meeting.
 
=== Organization of the Wiki ===
 
On the frontpage, there should be:
* The current tasks on which students should work (with deadlines)
* A menu leading to index pages for various tasks (project planning pages index, project pages index, dictionary index, common bibliography, etc.)
* Extra-information like Wiki Help
 
Below is a screenshot (in french)
[[image:mediawiki-supported-pbl-history.png|frame|none|Mediawiki-supported project-oriented learning in history]]


* Team
== Other examples ==
=== Implementation of the research project ===


=== Finalization ===
{{comment | this is still missing, e.g. out experiences with biology teaching at high-school level, or writing-to-learn designs at master level...}}


[[Category: Instructional design models]]
[[Category: Instructional design models]]

Revision as of 23:16, 18 September 2006

Draft

Definition

We define wiki-supported project-oriented learning as some kind of relativly open enden project-based learning design that uses the wiki as sole (or central) tool. Of course, such a design also can be adapted to other project-oriented learning designs, e.g. inquiry learning

Pedagogical goals:

  • Create applicable and/or "deep" knowledge in some domain
  • Learn how to conduct a research project.

Example architecture (1)

Below are some suggestions that need to be adapted to your needs.

Context

  • This model has been tested in 2006 with a semester-long undergraduate class in history of deviant social behavior. Both teacher and students didn't have much exposure to Internet technology.

Preparation and wiki training

  • DSchneider helped designing the course (2h of work) and then sometimes met with the teacher and the class. All in all it rather was a "low cost" operation and no systematic observation was performed. Evaluation by students was "ok", but some complained about the workload.
  • Students received less then half an hour of wiki training in the beginning and a short help text including short editorial guidelines were prepared. Most students ignored some important features of the wiki, e.g. some didn't really undestand how links work, why one should use titles, how to organize a discussion page, etc. A few forget to save articles from time to time and lost stuff, because they didn't know how to copy/paste after an editing timeout and this created some frustrations. The overall result (wiki pages) however was acceptable, but DSchneider believes that some more training couldn't hurt ...

Stages

The model has four stages.

(1) Preparation
  • Teacher defines global course topic
  • Defines (ajustable) milestones and student evaluation procedure
  • Student teams (5 to 7 members) are formed according to their interests (each student had to write a short text in the wiki)
(2) Planning
  • Team members search resources, start some reading
  • Students write the initial specification of the project, for example goals and questions.
  • Students add some planning elements: Rough definition of tasks (work packages) and important milestones.
  • Teacher gives feedback and students revise the project plan (at least 2 times)

Note each team uses

  • A single project / research plan page.
  • A page for the paper (i.e. the research
  • Other pages for shared activities (see below)
(3a) Implementation of the research project
  • Students were set to work on their project. More or less informal deadlines have been set for important milestones.
  • After some initial fieldwork (interviews/reading documents) students were asked to present their research methods (this is somewhat particular to history). Also, sometimes students made adjustements to the plan themselves.
  • Teachers insures that some cooperation (either off-line or on-line happens). Some presential classes have been cancelled and replaced by meeting time for students.
  • Once per week teacher gave feedback in the wiki (mostly in discussion pages).
  • Repeat the previsous steps until all milestones are met and/or the course end approaches
(3b) Other activities

Students also were asked to:

  • Work on a common bibliography
  • A dictionary of terms
(4) Finalization
  • It was required that final project (a long wiki page) somewhat met academic standards
  • Each group had to present result to class and then make some adjustments
  • Grades and the whole experience are discussed in a final meeting.

Organization of the Wiki

On the frontpage, there should be:

  • The current tasks on which students should work (with deadlines)
  • A menu leading to index pages for various tasks (project planning pages index, project pages index, dictionary index, common bibliography, etc.)
  • Extra-information like Wiki Help

Below is a screenshot (in french)

Mediawiki-supported project-oriented learning in history

Other examples

this is still missing, e.g. out experiences with biology teaching at high-school level, or writing-to-learn designs at master level...