Talk:CAS Digital Learning in Emergencies (2022-23)/module4-Taam: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
With regard to Openness, you focus only on the access part. What about openness at the epistemic level? What about collaborating to elaborate knowledge that is then freely accessible?  
With regard to Openness, you focus only on the access part. What about openness at the epistemic level? What about collaborating to elaborate knowledge that is then freely accessible?  
The purpose of your learning in this module is clear but could you please design a complete scenario, with learning outcomes, activities and evaluation criteria, to achieve it? Are you for instance going to elaborate a rubric to evaluate the resources you find?
The purpose of your learning in this module is clear but could you please design a complete scenario, with learning outcomes, activities and evaluation criteria, to achieve it? Are you for instance going to elaborate a rubric to evaluate the resources you find?
== Open education and open science: The case of cognitive neuroscience research labs -- [[User:Taam|Taam]] ([[User talk:Taam|talk]]) 17:36, 20 December 2022 (CET) -- [[User:Taam|Taam]] ([[User talk:Taam|talk]]) 17:36, 20 December 2022 (CET) ==
== Introduction ==
Research is considered an arena of science. Research, on the other hand, does not start from scratch, neither does it start by uneducated people. The research is initiated from knowledge acquired by researchers in school and university, i.e. through education. At the same time, research produces knowledge for learners and instructors in school and university, that is for education. Thus, it is a continuum in which education leads to science and science serves education.
<gallery>
Edu-Sci_continuum.png|Science - Education Continuum
</gallery>
   
As put by [https://www.inserm.fr/en/our-research/research-continuum/ Inserm], “beginning from what is already known [education], scientists ask questions, construct hypotheses, and develop experiments that will generate new knowledge [education]” (Inserm, 2021).
Inserm (2021). Research continuum. Online source avaliable at https://www.inserm.fr/en/our-research/research-continuum/. (Accessed on 20.12.2022.

Revision as of 18:43, 20 December 2022

-- BarbaraClass (talk) 15:48, 19 December 2022 (CET)

Thank you Tawfiq for sharing your scenario. With regard to Openness, you focus only on the access part. What about openness at the epistemic level? What about collaborating to elaborate knowledge that is then freely accessible? The purpose of your learning in this module is clear but could you please design a complete scenario, with learning outcomes, activities and evaluation criteria, to achieve it? Are you for instance going to elaborate a rubric to evaluate the resources you find?