Backwards design: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Definition) |
m (→Definition) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
* '''Backwards design''' (or backward design) is an [[instructional design method]] invented by Wiggins and McTighe and is part of their larger ''Understanding by Design'' framework. | * '''Backwards design''' (or backward design) later renamed to '''Understanding by Design®''' is an [[instructional design method]] invented by Wiggins and McTighe and is part of their larger ''Understanding by Design'' framework. | ||
* {{quotation | Backward design begins with the end in mind: What enduring understandings do I want my students to develop?}} ([http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/BackwardDesign/Overview.htm]). It is particularly suited for teacher designers who think in terms of what they wish to achieve. | * {{quotation | Backward design begins with the end in mind: What enduring understandings do I want my students to develop?}} ([http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/BackwardDesign/Overview.htm]). It is particularly suited for teacher designers who think in terms of what they wish to achieve. | ||
More precisely, the understanding by design framework means: 1) focus on teaching and assessing for understanding and learning transfer, and 2) design curriculum “backward” from those ends. [http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf Understanding by Design Framework], retrieved March 2018) | |||
== The model == | == The model == | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Wiggins and McTighe insist a lot on enduring understandings and that go beyond simple facts and skills to include larger concepts, principles or processes. | Wiggins and McTighe insist a lot on enduring understandings and that go beyond simple facts and skills to include larger concepts, principles or processes. | ||
== Variants == | == Variants == | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
* [http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf Understanding by Design Framework] (Whitepaper, retrieved March 2018). | |||
* [http://pixel.fhda.edu/id/six_facets.html Developing Goals and Objectives] | * [http://pixel.fhda.edu/id/six_facets.html Developing Goals and Objectives] | ||
* [http://www.ubdexchange.org/ Understanding by Design Exchange]. This is the Website sponsored by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe. Includes resources. | * [http://www.ubdexchange.org/ Understanding by Design Exchange]. This is the Website sponsored by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe. Includes resources. | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
* [http://www.ltag.education.tas.gov.au/Planning/models/princbackdesign.htm Principles of Backward Design] | * [http://www.ltag.education.tas.gov.au/Planning/models/princbackdesign.htm Principles of Backward Design] | ||
* [http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/BackwardDesign/Overview.htm Backward Design] (Overview & FAQ at B. Ladwig and K Pagano-Fuller's English Language Arts Site.) | * [http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/instruction/ela/6-12/BackwardDesign/Overview.htm Backward Design] (Overview & FAQ at B. Ladwig and K Pagano-Fuller's English Language Arts Site.) | ||
* [http://digitalliteracy.mwg.org/curriculum/process.html Backward design process] at DigitalLiteracy ( | * [http://digitalliteracy.mwg.org/curriculum/process.html Backward design process] at DigitalLiteracy (include a nice 1-page summary in [http://digitalliteracy.mwg.org/documents/process.pdf PDF]. | ||
* [http://www.ltag.education.tas.gov.au/Planning/models/princbackdesign.htm Principles of Backward Design] (Short overview and some pointers). | * [http://www.ltag.education.tas.gov.au/Planning/models/princbackdesign.htm Principles of Backward Design] (Short overview and some pointers). | ||
* Janice Christy (2004), [http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/49 Teaching for Understanding] (This short article gives and overview of the larger context "learning by design"). | * Janice Christy (2004), [http://www.glencoe.com/sec/teachingtoday/educationupclose.phtml/49 Teaching for Understanding] (This short article gives and overview of the larger context "learning by design"). | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
[[Category:Instructional design models]] | [[Category:Instructional design models]] | ||
[[Category:Design methodologies]] | [[Category:Design methodologies]] | ||
[[Category:Instructional design methods]] |
Latest revision as of 16:31, 16 March 2018
Definition
- Backwards design (or backward design) later renamed to Understanding by Design® is an instructional design method invented by Wiggins and McTighe and is part of their larger Understanding by Design framework.
- “Backward design begins with the end in mind: What enduring understandings do I want my students to develop?” ([1]). It is particularly suited for teacher designers who think in terms of what they wish to achieve.
More precisely, the understanding by design framework means: 1) focus on teaching and assessing for understanding and learning transfer, and 2) design curriculum “backward” from those ends. Understanding by Design Framework, retrieved March 2018)
The model
The model has 3 stages:
- Identify desired results (learning outcomes)
- “What should students know, understand, and be able to do? What is worthy of understanding? What enduring understandings are desired?” ([2])
- Determine Acceptable Evidence (means to assess if learners have learnt)
- “How will we know if students have achieved the desired results and met the standards? What will we accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency?”([3])
- Plan learning experiences and instruction. This includes:
- definition of knowledge (know-that), skills and procedures (know-how) students ought to master
- definition of materials
- definition of learning /teaching activities (scenarios).
Wiggins and McTighe insist a lot on enduring understandings and that go beyond simple facts and skills to include larger concepts, principles or processes.
Variants
There exist other variants, e.g. below is a set of steps adapted to specific schoolteachers in a specific environment (see Backward Design Overview & FAQ:
- Decide on the themes, enduring understandings and essential questions for the unit.
- Design a summative for the end of the unit.
- Align the unit with the New York State ELA Standards and choose outcomes, strategies and best practices to teach them.
- Choose resources to create a rich and engaging multi-genre thematically-linked unit.
- Weave back and forth across the curriculum map to make revisions and refinements.
Links
- Understanding by Design Framework (Whitepaper, retrieved March 2018).
- Developing Goals and Objectives
- Understanding by Design Exchange. This is the Website sponsored by Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe. Includes resources.
- Understanding by Design (PDF Slides by Ellen.B Meier)
- Principles of Backward Design
- Backward Design (Overview & FAQ at B. Ladwig and K Pagano-Fuller's English Language Arts Site.)
- Backward design process at DigitalLiteracy (include a nice 1-page summary in PDF.
- Principles of Backward Design (Short overview and some pointers).
- Janice Christy (2004), Teaching for Understanding (This short article gives and overview of the larger context "learning by design").
References
- Wiggins,G., McTighe, J. (2006) Are the Best Curricular Designs "Backward"?
- Wiggins,G., McTighe, J. (2001). Understanding by Design, Prentice Hall. ISBN 013093058X
- Wiggins,G. & Jay McTighe: (2004). Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.