User talk:AydınSarıkaya: Difference between revisions
m (Welcome!) |
(→project for methods -- ~~~~ -- ~~~~: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
PS: This is an automatically generated message. Feel free to remove this text from your page. [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] 21:26, 10 June 2012 (CEST) | PS: This is an automatically generated message. Feel free to remove this text from your page. [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]] 21:26, 10 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
== project for methods -- [[User:AydınSarıkaya|AydınSarıkaya]] 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST) -- [[User:AydınSarıkaya|AydınSarıkaya]] 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST) == | |||
Can project be a unique method which lost its hegemony on "generalisation" that is a slave of ip protocol which has its own ascii-generals against organic-hacks? | |||
As a spectrality from a bit to tetra, each project seems a production of new way that can be a new method if should call it, but instead of using grandparents names, new nouns should be pronounced. | |||
This can be a clear sense for clarifying some darkclouds on the identifying old methodic categories and discourses for some new technologies, not iron or steel but iron and still that can speak and dance by codes. | |||
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too. | |||
Revision as of 21:21, 10 June 2012
Welcome to EduTech Wiki!
We hope that you will contribute, in whichever way you like.
You will probably want to consult the help pages and have a look at the Editing rules.
We use strong anti-spamming measures. As soon you are known as a friendly contributor you will be moved to an "author group" that doesn't need to fill in captcha's for each edit. If I don't "see" you, just ask with a post on my discussion page.
Again, welcome!
PS: This is an automatically generated message. Feel free to remove this text from your page. Daniel K. Schneider 21:26, 10 June 2012 (CEST)
project for methods -- AydınSarıkaya 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST) -- AydınSarıkaya 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST)
Can project be a unique method which lost its hegemony on "generalisation" that is a slave of ip protocol which has its own ascii-generals against organic-hacks?
As a spectrality from a bit to tetra, each project seems a production of new way that can be a new method if should call it, but instead of using grandparents names, new nouns should be pronounced.
This can be a clear sense for clarifying some darkclouds on the identifying old methodic categories and discourses for some new technologies, not iron or steel but iron and still that can speak and dance by codes.
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too.