Taba teaching strategy model: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
Line 9: Line 9:
According to Joyce and Weil (2000:131), Taba built her approach around three assumptions:
According to Joyce and Weil (2000:131), Taba built her approach around three assumptions:


# Thinking can be taught (through engaging students in pactice, in particular inductive reasoning).
# Thinking can be taught (through engaging students in practice, in particular inductive reasoning).
# Thinking is an active transaction between the individual and data. This relies on earlier theories, e.g. Bruner's concept attainment, an important component of [[concept learning]]
# Thinking is an active transaction between the individual and data. This relies on earlier theories, e.g. Bruner's concept attainment, an important component of [[concept learning]]
# Processes of thought evolve by a sequence that is "lawful", somewhat in the sense of [[mastery learning]].
# Processes of thought evolve by a sequence that is "lawful", somewhat in the sense of [[mastery learning]].
Line 20: Line 20:
== The model ==
== The model ==


According to Joyce and Weil (2000), [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/ think inductively], [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/taba_handbook.htm Handbook to Elementary Social Studies] we made a provisional summary ot the model (have to get the original at some point - [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]]).
According to Joyce and Weil (2000), [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/ think inductively], [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/taba_handbook.htm Handbook to Elementary Social Studies] we made a provisional summary of the model (have to get the original at some point - [[User:Daniel K. Schneider|Daniel K. Schneider]]).


=== Concept Formation ===
=== Concept Formation ===
Line 26: Line 26:
This stage includes three major steps: listing items (exemplars of concepts), group similar items together, label these (with a concept name).
This stage includes three major steps: listing items (exemplars of concepts), group similar items together, label these (with a concept name).


* Identifying and enumerating
* '''Phase 1:''' Identifying and listing
** What do you know about the presidents?
** What do you know about .... ?
** For lessons in your own classroom, you might ask the following: What did you see? What did you hear? What do you know about...?
** For lessons in your own classroom, you might ask the following: What did you see? What did you hear? What do you know about...?
* Grouping according to common attributes
* '''Phase 2:''' Grouping according to common attributes
** Do any of these go together? Why?
** Do any of these go together? Why?
* Labeling categories
* '''Phase 3:''' Categorizing (labeling of the categories above)
** How would you name these groups?
** How would you name these groups?


Line 38: Line 38:
This stage includes interpreting, inferring, and generalization and leads to concept attainment (i.e. students develop deductive capabilities).
This stage includes interpreting, inferring, and generalization and leads to concept attainment (i.e. students develop deductive capabilities).


* Identifying critical relationships (differentiation)
* '''Phase 4:''' Identifying critical relationships (differentiation)
** What do you notice about the data ? What did you see ?
** What do you notice about the data ? What did you see ?


* Exploring relationships (cause-effect)
* '''Phase 5:''' Exploring relationships (cause-effect)
** Why did this or that happen? What do you think this means?
** Why did this or that happen? What do you think this means?
** Do you notice any connections within the records or across the data?  
** Do you notice any connections within the records or across the data?  


* Making inferences
* '''Phase 6:''' Making inferences
** What makes you think about this?  
** What makes you think about this?  
** What can you conclude?
** What can you conclude?
Note: At some point phases 1/2/3 can be repeated or revised.


=== Application of Principles ===
=== Application of Principles ===


* Predicting consequences
* '''Phase 7:''' Predicting consequences
** What if?
** What if?
* Explaining and/or supporting predictions
* '''Phase 8:''' Explaining and/or supporting predictions
** Why do you think this or that would happen?
** Why do you think this or that would happen?
** Based on the data, would these conditions be logical?
** Based on the data, would these conditions be logical?
* Testing and generalization
* '''Phase 9:''' Testing and generalization
** What would it take to make this generally true ?
** What would it take to make this generally true ?


Line 65: Line 67:
* [http://www.unf.edu/~jbosnick/jb/3324concfor.pdf Concept Formation or Concept Development Model by Hilda Taba (1966)] by Janet Bosnick  
* [http://www.unf.edu/~jbosnick/jb/3324concfor.pdf Concept Formation or Concept Development Model by Hilda Taba (1966)] by Janet Bosnick  


* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/taba_handbook.htm Summary of Taba's ch 5. Teacher's Handbook] an other verion is [http://www.lovinlearning.org/heroes/concept_attainment_Taba.htm Concept Attainment] (not clear who copied from whom).
* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/inductive/taba_handbook.htm Summary of Taba's ch 5. Teacher's Handbook] an other version is [http://www.lovinlearning.org/heroes/concept_attainment_Taba.htm Concept Attainment] (not clear who copied from whom).


* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/splash/framework/categories.htm Outline of framework for instruction and learning]
* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/fundamentals/splash/framework/categories.htm Outline of framework for instruction and learning]
Line 72: Line 74:


* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/imet1/peaty/proficient/database.htm The Database Project]
* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/imet1/peaty/proficient/database.htm The Database Project]
* [http://imet.csus.edu/classic/imet1/dave/periodictable/


== References ==
== References ==
Line 84: Line 88:


[[Category: Instructional design models]]
[[Category: Instructional design models]]
[[Category: Pedagogical strategies]]
[[Category: Pedagogic strategies]]

Latest revision as of 11:48, 7 November 2007

Draft

Definition

The Taba teaching strategy model (our name) was defined in the sixties by Hilda Taba and aims to help designing courses down to lessons in areas where students are supposed to learn how to think.

Background assumptions

According to Joyce and Weil (2000:131), Taba built her approach around three assumptions:

  1. Thinking can be taught (through engaging students in practice, in particular inductive reasoning).
  2. Thinking is an active transaction between the individual and data. This relies on earlier theories, e.g. Bruner's concept attainment, an important component of concept learning
  3. Processes of thought evolve by a sequence that is "lawful", somewhat in the sense of mastery learning.

Taba identified three inductive thinking skills:

  • concept formation (concept learning)
  • interpretation of data
  • application of principles

The model

According to Joyce and Weil (2000), think inductively, Handbook to Elementary Social Studies we made a provisional summary of the model (have to get the original at some point - Daniel K. Schneider).

Concept Formation

This stage includes three major steps: listing items (exemplars of concepts), group similar items together, label these (with a concept name).

  • Phase 1: Identifying and listing
    • What do you know about .... ?
    • For lessons in your own classroom, you might ask the following: What did you see? What did you hear? What do you know about...?
  • Phase 2: Grouping according to common attributes
    • Do any of these go together? Why?
  • Phase 3: Categorizing (labeling of the categories above)
    • How would you name these groups?

Interpretation of Data

This stage includes interpreting, inferring, and generalization and leads to concept attainment (i.e. students develop deductive capabilities).

  • Phase 4: Identifying critical relationships (differentiation)
    • What do you notice about the data ? What did you see ?
  • Phase 5: Exploring relationships (cause-effect)
    • Why did this or that happen? What do you think this means?
    • Do you notice any connections within the records or across the data?
  • Phase 6: Making inferences
    • What makes you think about this?
    • What can you conclude?

Note: At some point phases 1/2/3 can be repeated or revised.

Application of Principles

  • Phase 7: Predicting consequences
    • What if?
  • Phase 8: Explaining and/or supporting predictions
    • Why do you think this or that would happen?
    • Based on the data, would these conditions be logical?
  • Phase 9: Testing and generalization
    • What would it take to make this generally true ?

Links

Summaries

Examples

References

  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Joyce, B., Weil, M., Calhoun, E. : Models of teaching, 6th edition, Allyn & Bacon, 2000. ISBN 0205389279. (This is on my essential reading list).
  • Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development; theory and practice. New York,: Harcourt Brace & World.
  • Taba, H. (1967). Teacher's handbook for elementary social studies. Palo Alto, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.