Property:Selflance

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:


With a quotation from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embodied_philosophy:
With a quotation from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embodied_philosophy:
"
In [[philosophy]], the '''embodied mind thesis''' holds that the nature of the human [[mind]] is largely determined by the form of the human body.
[[Philosopher]]s, [[psychology|psychologist]]s, [[cognitive science|cognitive scientist]]s and [[artificial intelligence|artificial intelligence researcher]]s who study '''embodied cognition''' and the '''embodied mind''' argue that all aspects of cognition are shaped by aspects of the body. The aspects of cognition include high level mental constructs (such as [[concept]]s and [[category|categories]]) and human performance on various cognitive tasks (such as reasoning or judgement). The aspects of the body include the [[motor system]], the [[perceptual system]], the body's interactions with the environment ([[situated]]ness) and the [[ontological]] assumptions about the world that are built into the body and the brain.


The embodied mind thesis is opposed to other theories of [[cognition]] such as [[Cognitivism (psychology)|cognitivism]], [[computationalism]] and [[Dualism (philosophy of mind)|Cartesian dualism]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Varela|Thompson|Rosch|1992}}</ref> The idea has roots in [[Kant]] and [[continental philosophy|20th century continental philosophy]] (such as [[Merleau-Ponty]]). The modern version depends on insights drawn from recent research in [[psychology]], [[linguistics]], [[cognitive science]], [[Cognitive model#Dynamical Systems | dynamical systems]], [[artificial intelligence]], [[robotics]] and [[neurobiology]].
Moreover,some questions seem necessary:


Embodied cognition is a topic of research in [[social psychology|social]] and [[cognitive psychology]], covering issues such as [[social interaction]] and [[decision-making]].<ref name="Borghi & Cimatti">{{cite journal|last=Borghi|first=A. M.|coauthors=Cimatti, F.|title=Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body|journal=Neuropsychologia|year=2010|volume=48|pages=763–773|doi=10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.029|issue=3|pmid=19913041|ref=harv}}</ref>  Embodied cognition reflects the argument that the [[motor system]] influences our cognition, just as the mind influences bodily actions.  For example, when participants hold a pencil in their teeth engaging the muscles of a smile, they comprehend pleasant sentences faster than unpleasant ones.<ref name="Glenberg et al.">{{cite journal|last=Glenberg|first=A.|coauthors=Havas, D.; Becker, R.; & Rinck, M.|title=Grounding language in bodily states: the case for emotion|year=2010|ref=harv}}</ref>  And it works in reverse: holding a pencil in their teeth to engage the muscles of a frown increases the time it takes to comprehend pleasant sentences.<ref name="Glenberg et al." />
CAN


[[George Lakoff]] (a [[cognitive scientist]] and [[linguistics|linguist]]) and his collaborators (including [[Mark Johnson (professor)|Mark Johnson]], [[Mark Turner (cognitive scientist)|Mark Turner]], and [[Rafael E. Núñez]]) have written a series of books promoting and expanding the thesis based on discoveries in [[cognitive science]], such as [[conceptual metaphor]] and [[image schema]].<ref>{{Harvtxt|Lakoff|Johnson|1980}}; {{Harvtxt|Lakoff|1987}}; {{Harvtxt|Lakoff|Turner|1989}}; {{Harvtxt|Lakoff|Johnson|1999}}; {{Harvnb|Lakoff|Nunez|2000}}</ref>
HOLISTIC COGNITION BE


[[Robotic]]s researchers such as [[Rodney Brooks]], [[Hans Moravec]] and [[Rolf Pfeifer]] have argued that true [[artificial intelligence]] can only be achieved by machines that have [[Sensory perception|sensory]] and [[motor skills]] and are connected to the world through a body.<ref>{{Harvnb|Moravec|1988}}, {{Harvnb|Brooks|1990}}, {{Harvnb|Pfeiffer|2001}}</ref> The insights of these robotics researchers have in turn inspired philosophers like [[Andy Clark]] and [[Horst Hendriks-Jansen]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Clark|1997}}, {{Harvnb|Hendriks-Jansen|1996}}</ref>
A METHODIC WAY OF LEARNING


[[Neurobiology|Neuroscientist]]s [[Gerald Edelman]], [[António Damásio]] and others have outlined the connection between the body, individual structures in the brain and aspects of the mind such as [[consciousness]], [[emotion]], [[self-awareness]] and [[Will (philosophy)|will]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Edelman|2004}}, {{Harvnb|Damasio|1999}}</ref> [[Biology]] has also inspired [[Gregory Bateson]], [[Humberto Maturana]], [[Francisco Varela]], [[Eleanor Rosch]] and [[Evan Thompson]] to develop a closely related version of the idea, which they call [[enactivism]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Maturana|Varela|1987}}, {{Harvnb|Varela|Thompson|Rosch|1992}}</ref> The [[motor theory of speech perception]] proposed by [[Alvin Liberman]] and colleagues at the [[Haskins Laboratories]] argues that the identification of words is embodied in perception of the bodily movements by which spoken words are made.<ref name="Liberman67">{{cite journal|pmid=4170865|year=1967|last1=Liberman|first1=AM|last2=Cooper|first2=FS|last3=Shankweiler|first3=DP|last4=Studdert-Kennedy|first4=M|title=Perception of the speech code|volume=74|issue=6|pages=431–61|journal=Psychological review|ref=harv|doi=10.1037/h0020279}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|pmid=4075760|year=1985|last1=Liberman|first1=AM|last2=Mattingly|first2=IG|title=The motor theory of speech perception revised|volume=21|issue=1|pages=1–36|journal=Cognition|ref=harv|doi=10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|pmid=|2643163|year=1989|last1=Liberman|first1=AM|last2=Mattingly|first2=IG|title=A specialization for speech perception|volume=243|issue=4890|pages=489–94|journal=Science|ref=harv}}</ref><ref name="Liberman00">{{cite journal|pmid=10782105|year=2000|last1=Liberman|first1=AM|last2=Whalen|first2=DH|title=On the relation of speech to language|volume=4|issue=5|pages=187–196|journal=Trends in cognitive sciences|ref=harv|doi=10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01471-6}}</ref><ref name="Galantucci">{{cite journal|pmid=17048719|year=2006|last1=Galantucci|first1=B|last2=Fowler|first2=CA|last3=Turvey|first3=MT|title=The motor theory of speech perception reviewed|volume=13|issue=3|pages=361–77|pmc=2746041|journal=Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|ref=harv}}</ref>
FOR NEW GENERATION
"


WHO HAS AN OPEN DNA SYSTEM


WITHIN


UBIQUITOUS ASCII TECHNOLOGY


OF TODAYS ? (a.sarıkaya)


Can the term of "holism" be so significant from the point of project implementations and vision. 


However, the next or digital generation is a real criteria that carries on the era of all developments as a way of their lifelong learning.
The way of their life also represents their being a particular or an essential particularisation of new developments which represents ascii codifications as a new language of technology.


Moreover, these paradigmatic developments also replace the classical corner-concepts as ontology-epistemology and so on, by the developments of nano or synthetic biology in a way of social life, all represents the unity of life as a system where body and mind are open parts of these developments within rejection of being and having a closed value.


Holism as a methodic value can not live long in such a kind of new verifications and validities of life. Otherwise, it becomes a source of so many new forms of value conflictions as a cheap ascii games.


--
-


TAGGING and SELFLANCE




can tag-ging be metaphysic of network analytics?


Tagging represents the transformation of the name-space strategy of network architecture in terms of the enduser action.


Network itself is based on the physical rule of real nature in terms of its electromagnetic diagrams within tne devices. The namespace strategy, as the reformation of Artificial Intelligent, as it represents the extentions of aristotelian logic manners as well by its modal values to form the moduls, becomes the echos of freedoom, chooses and so many different ways of classifying link designs as a result of enduser interactions.


The rising of tagging and its differentiation into hash and slash types, are not so simple dynamics when the evolution of the data model represents the cloud network architects.


It becomes something as Weather Report of clouds that represent the responses of the endusers that their tendency or tagging itself becomes the referance for value production on net.


This brings out the formation of new generation type that seems necessary to ask the user types:


Are the net generation only some tagging models or tendencies?


And if yes, than what would be the ability of their life-value extensions except the trade marks of devices?
Because, even tagging can represent a referance for tendencies, they can not represent the differentiation of file-extensions. 
Since namespacing is a strategic value of producing AI design, tagging seems only "accept or reject" actions rather then producing and differentiating new file extentions.
Moreover, regarding the mentioned  framework above, the value of webtools seems under some obligations as well.
Each of the webtool only represent a given blank-space design in any way, to be filled by the user data, but without any ability of differentiation of any extension.
So if necessary, the differentiations of files and users are already interdepented  not only in terms of durations but also devices as well. Hence it seems as the authority of devices as the extension value of both user and files. Moreover, it brings out the devices as the life extensions of new generations. Surely it is definite for the newlief ways of the outerspaces, but should it be an obligation for the earth life? 
/
http://www.teleurope.eu/pg/blog/read/179304/can-tagging-be-metaphysic-of-network-analytics
/


----
----
Line 71: Line 100:


<small>The allowed value for this property is:
<small>The allowed value for this property is:
* [[Allows value::surveillance]]</small>
* [[Allows value::surveillance, tagging, tags]]</small>

Latest revision as of 19:54, 14 April 2015


This is a property of type Selflance.

This text will be the reflection of an attempt to formulate a term as selflance.

As it is "they are" with self and lance, "selflance" itself should be out of in/for statements of self, in addition to the manner of the "lance" that can be related to the term of lense from the point of its visuality.

Surveillance from the point of its multidimensions for today, is already a disciplinary subject. And maybe evaluated back a social hegemony management model "for itself" on "in itself". Surely this seems conflictional and paradigmatic, and that is also the general manner for the concşusions in this era. In a simple case of this sens, while there are tendencies or critiques on the subjects of surveillance by some technologies, there have been also tendencies and researches to formulate the education or learning values and approaches for the same technologies that next generations should be able to adapt and manage it for their future.

These are also where generation is with problems for their own ( self development.) -but is it necessary?-

Which is referance for their own self?

User name with password as its extention, ironically, or contents contributed/evaluated by them?

It looks as level stages, because possible answers may change in terms of accessible permissions, as guest user, member, moderator, admin, cpanel manager, even domain, or server owner/renter, also with all possible user types by admins.

Rather then the clarifiation of these level stratifications, their being as validitor of referance for identity of self, seems essential and operational.

And I will attempt to interpellate this scene as unity of "self" with "lance" to construct "selflance".


- So what? -this is for my other page types.-


Selflance .. that looks as a "whitepaper" irony against density of determined conditions. But not so much. Because "hisenbergian undeterminancy should protect against it. Hence the remaining risk becomes the duality of body-mind priority. At the end it comes the question of cognitive paradigmes as if holistic or constructivist or augmantic or reflective and so on etc.


The general discussions waves the clarifications of this duality between mind and body. And even holistic approach itself tries to overcome it within the unification of both.

But is it? And any refernce of the results for these paradigmes will be the criteria for new generations adaptability. That also makes the validity of mind-body model of that generation a well.

With a quotation from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embodied_philosophy:

Moreover,some questions seem necessary:

CAN

HOLISTIC COGNITION BE

A METHODIC WAY OF LEARNING

FOR NEW GENERATION

WHO HAS AN OPEN DNA SYSTEM

WITHIN

UBIQUITOUS ASCII TECHNOLOGY

OF TODAYS ? (a.sarıkaya)

Can the term of "holism" be so significant from the point of project implementations and vision.

However, the next or digital generation is a real criteria that carries on the era of all developments as a way of their lifelong learning. The way of their life also represents their being a particular or an essential particularisation of new developments which represents ascii codifications as a new language of technology. 

Moreover, these paradigmatic developments also replace the classical corner-concepts as ontology-epistemology and so on, by the developments of nano or synthetic biology in a way of social life, all represents the unity of life as a system where body and mind are open parts of these developments within rejection of being and having a closed value.

Holism as a methodic value can not live long in such a kind of new verifications and validities of life. Otherwise, it becomes a source of so many new forms of value conflictions as a cheap ascii games.

-- -

TAGGING and SELFLANCE


can tag-ging be metaphysic of network analytics?

Tagging represents the transformation of the name-space strategy of network architecture in terms of the enduser action.

Network itself is based on the physical rule of real nature in terms of its electromagnetic diagrams within tne devices. The namespace strategy, as the reformation of Artificial Intelligent, as it represents the extentions of aristotelian logic manners as well by its modal values to form the moduls, becomes the echos of freedoom, chooses and so many different ways of classifying link designs as a result of enduser interactions.

The rising of tagging and its differentiation into hash and slash types, are not so simple dynamics when the evolution of the data model represents the cloud network architects.

It becomes something as Weather Report of clouds that represent the responses of the endusers that their tendency or tagging itself becomes the referance for value production on net.

This brings out the formation of new generation type that seems necessary to ask the user types:

Are the net generation only some tagging models or tendencies?

And if yes, than what would be the ability of their life-value extensions except the trade marks of devices?

Because, even tagging can represent a referance for tendencies, they can not represent the differentiation of file-extensions.

Since namespacing is a strategic value of producing AI design, tagging seems only "accept or reject" actions rather then producing and differentiating new file extentions.

Moreover, regarding the mentioned framework above, the value of webtools seems under some obligations as well.

Each of the webtool only represent a given blank-space design in any way, to be filled by the user data, but without any ability of differentiation of any extension.

So if necessary, the differentiations of files and users are already interdepented not only in terms of durations but also devices as well. Hence it seems as the authority of devices as the extension value of both user and files. Moreover, it brings out the devices as the life extensions of new generations. Surely it is definite for the newlief ways of the outerspaces, but should it be an obligation for the earth life? 

/

http://www.teleurope.eu/pg/blog/read/179304/can-tagging-be-metaphysic-of-network-analytics /

tags: all for role, base, user, value, differs to selfish, reflective theories, walking types in mirror forest.

The allowed value for this property is:

  • surveillance, tagging, tags
The request is being processed and may take a moment.


Preparing ...

{
    "type": "PROPERTY_CONSTRAINT_SCHEMA",
    "constraints": {
        "type_constraint": "_wpg",
        "allowed_values": [
            "surveillance, tagging, tags"
        ]
    }
}
Retrieved from "https://edutechwiki.unige.ch/mediawiki/index.php?title=Property:Selflance&oldid=55446"