Grading form: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


== Definitions ==
{{quotation|Scoring rubrics are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or other evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or processes of students' efforts (Brookhart, 1999). Scoring rubrics are typically employed when a judgement of quality is required and may be used to evaluate a broad range of subjects and activities. }} ([http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3 Moskal, 2000], retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST))
{{quotation|A rubric is simply a scoring tool that identifies the various criteria relevant to an assignment or learning outcome, and then explicitly states the possible levels of achievement along a continuum (poor to excellent or novice to expert). Rubrics can be used to assess almost any type of student work be it essays, final projects, oral presentations, or theatrical performances. They can be used at the time that an assignment is made to communicate expectations to students, when student work is evaluated for fair and efficient grading, and to assess a program by determining the extent to which students are achieving departmental learning outcomes.}} ([http://condor.depaul.edu/tla/Assessment/AssessmentRubrics.html DePaul University], , retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST)).
== Software ==
=== Rubrics support in LMSs ===
* Moodle 2.0 supports [http://docs.moodle.org/22/en/Rubrics Rubrics]. These are available under [http://docs.moodle.org/22/en/Advanced_grading_methods advanced grading forms]. The rubric consists of a set of criteria. For each criterion, several descriptive levels are provided. A numerical grade is assigned to each of these levels. The rater chooses which level answers/describes the given criterion best. The raw rubric score is calculated as a sum of all criteria grades. The final grade is calculated by comparing the actual score with the worst/best possible score that could be received.
== Links ==
=== Introductions to rubrics ===
(also may include examples)
* [http://condor.depaul.edu/tla/Assessment/AssessmentRubrics.html What is a Rubric ?] DePaul University, retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST)
=== Resource sites ===
* [http://www.schrockguide.net/assessment-and-rubrics.html Assessment and Rubrics] This part of [http://www.schrockguide.net/ Kathy Schrock's Guide to Everything!] is very complete.
=== Grading rubric examples ===
* [http://www.uen.org/rubric/ Utah Education Network] Grading rubrics tool. Login is required for creation of rubrics, but rubrics can be consulted. Retrieved oct. 2012
* [http://www.carla.umn.edu/assessment/vac/Evaluation/p_7.html http://www.carla.umn.edu/assessment/vac/Evaluation/p_7.html]
== Bibliography ==
* Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The Missing Part of Pedagogy. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (Vol. 27, No.1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
* Dornisch, Michele M. and Sabatini McLoughlin, Andrea. (2006). Limitations of web-based rubric resources: Addressing the challenges. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(3). Retrieved November 3, 2009.
* ERIC/AE, Scoring Rubrics - Definitions & Construction, http://ericae.net/faqs/rubrics/scoring_rubrics.htm, retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST).
* Huba, M. E. & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
* Johnson, B. (1996). The Performance Assessment Handbook: Designs from the Field and Guidelines for the Territory Ahead. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
* Knecht, R., Moskal, B. & Pavelich, M. (2000). The Design Report Rubric: Measuring and Tracking Growth through Success, Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.
* Moskal, Barbara M. & Jon A. Leydens (2000). Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10).
* Lazear, D. (1998). The Rubrics Way: Using MI to Assess Understanding. Tucscon, AZ: Zephyr Press.
* Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how?. Practical Assessment, ''Research & Evaluation'', 7(3), [http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3 HTML]
* Popham, W. James. (1997). What's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics. Educational Leadership,55(2). Retrieved November 3, 2009.
* Stevens, D. D. & Levi, A.J. (2005) Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
* Taggart, G.L., Phifer, S.J., Nixon, J., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (1998). Rubrics: A Handbook for Construction and Use. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.




[[Category: Learner assessment and evaluation]]
[[Category: Learner assessment and evaluation]]

Revision as of 17:38, 17 October 2012

Draft

Definitions

“Scoring rubrics are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or other evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or processes of students' efforts (Brookhart, 1999). Scoring rubrics are typically employed when a judgement of quality is required and may be used to evaluate a broad range of subjects and activities.” (Moskal, 2000, retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST))

“A rubric is simply a scoring tool that identifies the various criteria relevant to an assignment or learning outcome, and then explicitly states the possible levels of achievement along a continuum (poor to excellent or novice to expert). Rubrics can be used to assess almost any type of student work be it essays, final projects, oral presentations, or theatrical performances. They can be used at the time that an assignment is made to communicate expectations to students, when student work is evaluated for fair and efficient grading, and to assess a program by determining the extent to which students are achieving departmental learning outcomes.” (DePaul University, , retrieved 17:38, 17 October 2012 (CEST)).

Software

Rubrics support in LMSs

  • Moodle 2.0 supports Rubrics. These are available under advanced grading forms. The rubric consists of a set of criteria. For each criterion, several descriptive levels are provided. A numerical grade is assigned to each of these levels. The rater chooses which level answers/describes the given criterion best. The raw rubric score is calculated as a sum of all criteria grades. The final grade is calculated by comparing the actual score with the worst/best possible score that could be received.



Links

Introductions to rubrics

(also may include examples)

Resource sites

Grading rubric examples


Bibliography

  • Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The Missing Part of Pedagogy. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (Vol. 27, No.1). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
  • Dornisch, Michele M. and Sabatini McLoughlin, Andrea. (2006). Limitations of web-based rubric resources: Addressing the challenges. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(3). Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  • Huba, M. E. & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Johnson, B. (1996). The Performance Assessment Handbook: Designs from the Field and Guidelines for the Territory Ahead. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
  • Knecht, R., Moskal, B. & Pavelich, M. (2000). The Design Report Rubric: Measuring and Tracking Growth through Success, Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Moskal, Barbara M. & Jon A. Leydens (2000). Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10).
  • Lazear, D. (1998). The Rubrics Way: Using MI to Assess Understanding. Tucscon, AZ: Zephyr Press.
  • Moskal, Barbara M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), HTML
  • Popham, W. James. (1997). What's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics. Educational Leadership,55(2). Retrieved November 3, 2009.
  • Stevens, D. D. & Levi, A.J. (2005) Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Taggart, G.L., Phifer, S.J., Nixon, J., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (1998). Rubrics: A Handbook for Construction and Use. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing.