Developing design documents (3D) model: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:24, 7 November 2007

The 3D model of design documentation is a framework to discuss various kinds of instructional design languages and documents.

Boot (2005:26) argues that “production-related information is typically embedded in three types of building blocks for the production process: (a) design documents as input, (b) programming structures as throughput, and (c) learning materials as output.”

3D model includes three major dimensions:
  • stratification: Functionally different instructional and technical structures
  • degree of elaboration: conceptual, specification or implementation
  • formality: formal vs. informal

The model

3D model of design documentation

Stratification

Layers of instructional design

Gibbons (2000) argues that instructional designs are layered structures. Layering is a general design principle.

  • Content layer
  • Strategy layer
  • Control layer
  • Message layer
  • Representation layer
  • Media Logic layer
  • Management layer

Each instructional design layer is the defined by:

  • A specific set of design goals or problems
  • Sets of layer-specific design structures, expressed in the terms of design languages
  • Principles for the selection, arrangement, and mapping of structures within a layer
  • Principles for the relation of structures across layers
(Layered View of Instructional Designs , retrieved 14:37, 18 October 2006 (MEST))

Elaboration

Boot (2005:27) adopts Fowler's three perspectives for which different levels of detail can be specified:

  • A conceptual perspective, with more or less superficial and descriptive information;
  • a specification perspective, with more or less comprehensive and detailed information,
  • an implementation perspective with more or less technical and meticulous information

Formalization

Designers can choose to use formal design languages or not.

  • formal
  • informal

References

  • Boot, Eddy (2005), Building-block solutions for developing instructional software, PhD Dissertation, Open Universiteit Nederland. PDF and PDF
  • Boot, Eddy W.; Jon Nelson, Jeroen J.G. van Merri��nboer, Andrew S. Gibbons (2007). Stratification, elaboration and formalisation of design documents: Effects on the production of instructional materials, British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (5), 917�%G�–�%@933. [doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00679.x]
  • Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22-27. PDF (Access restricted)
  • Gibbons, Andrew, S. and Erin K. Brewer, (2005) ���Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design���. In J.M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, and D. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations to instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp. 111-129.
  • Waters, Sandie, H. & Andrew, S. Gibbons (2004). Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: A case study: Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 57-69. PDF (Access restricted)