Assessment management system

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Introduction

In education, the term "assessment management system" usually refers to an online platform that facilitates student assessment.

There are several types, e.g. system that allow defining, testing and administering standardized quizzes (e.g. Docimo, tacit performance assessment systems (where judges evaluate behavior), simulation/game based assessment, or e-learning platforms that allow evaluating a collection of student productions.

Draft

Bibliography

Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2014). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.

Barrett, H. (2004). Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management systems. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 46-50). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Barrett, H. (2005). Storytelling in higher education: A theory of reflection on practice to support deep learning. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1878-1883). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Miller,A.H., B.W. Imrie, K. Cox (1998). Student assessment in higher education: a handbook for assessing performance, Kogan Page, Ltd, London (1998)

Douce, Christopher, David Livingstone, and James Orwell. 2005. Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 5, 3, Article 4 (September 2005). DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1163405.1163409

Mitri, Michel (2003) A Knowledge Management Framework for Curriculum Assessment, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43:4, 15-2

Mitri, M. (2003). Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment. Computers & Education, 41(2), 173-189.

Yorke, M. (1998). The management of assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 101–116. doi:10.1080/0260293980230201