Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire
Introduction
chai et al. 2006
Chai et al. (2006) adapted an instrument developed by Chan and Elliott’s (2004) study. The latter was from Schommer’s larger 63-item questionnaire on various epistemological dimensions. This modified EBQ version “covers four dimensions, labelled as Innate/Fixed Ability, LearningEffort/Process, Authority/Expert Knowledge and Certainty of Knowledge” (Chai et al, 2006:291):
{{| |- ! Dimensions ! Sample items |- |Innate/Fixed Ability (INFIX) |● Students who begin school with average ability remain average ● Our ability to learn is fixed at birth |- |Learning Effort/Process (LEP) |● Understanding course materials and thinking process are more important than acquiring knowledge/facts ● Knowing how to learn is more important than the acquired facts |- |Authority/Expert Knowledge (AEK) |● I still believe in what the experts say even though it differs from what I know ● I have no doubt in whatever the expert says |- |Certainty of Knowledge (CK) |● Scientific knowledge is certain and does not change ● If scientists try hard enough, they can find the truth to almost anything |}
Bibliography
- Chai, C. S., Khine, M. S., & Teo, T. (2006). Epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning: a survey among pre‐service teachers in Singapore. Educational Media International, 43(4), 285–298. http://doi.org/10.1080/09523980600926242
- Chan, K. W. & Elliott, R. G. (2002) Exploratory study of Hong Kong teacher education students’ epistemolog-ical beliefs: cultural perspectives and implications on beliefs research,Contemporary Educational Psychology,27(3), 392–414.
- Chan, K. W. & Elliot, R. G. (2004) Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions aboutteaching and learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831
- Schommer, M. (1990) Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (3), 498–504