Group work roles
Introduction
Many educational strategies and tactics define roles for participants. The rational is that students groups function more efficiently and effectively when members have specific roles. Roles can be designed to trigger socio-cognitive processes.
Division of roles also exists in other contexts, e.g. management models
Defining and assigning roles
The procedure for define roles could include three steps
- Define the roles that are needed with respect to (learning) goals to be achieved and group dynamics that is desired
- Explain roles to students
- Design activities that capitalize on outcomes within groups, between groups and at the class level
- Debrief
List of models
Below we include lists of roles found on the web (randomly picked and sorted for now).
Doing CL, group roles
Source: Group Roles, Arhive, National Institute for Science education, retrieved July 10, 2017.
Role name | Function |
Group facilitator: | moderates discussions, keeps the group on task, assures work is done by all, and makes sure all have opportunity to participate and learn. |
Timekeeper: | monitors time and moves group along so that they complete the task in the available time, keeps area clean, assumes role of any missing group member if there is no wildcard member. |
Recorder: | takes notes of the group's discussion and prepares a written conclusion. |
Checker: | makes sure that all group members understand the concepts and the group's conclusions. |
Summarizer: | restates the group's conclusions or answers. |
Elaborator: | relates the discussion with prior concepts and knowledge. |
Research-Runner: | gets needed materials and is the liaison between groups and between their group and the instructor. |
Wildcard: | assumes role of any missing member. |
Student roles
Source: The following two groups of roles have been copied from Student Roles, Teaching Entry Level GeoScience, retrieved July 10, 2017. This list is based on the "Doing CL, group roles" above.
Potential Project Roles
Role name | Function |
Leader/Editor: | This student is in charge of organizing the final product of the project, be it a paper, a presentation, etc. That doesn't mean technical details, but of making sure that the project meets the standards set out by the instructor (often as a rubric), plus any extras stipulated by the group. These standards generally include punctuality and completeness. |
Recorder/Secretary: | This person takes notes whenever the group meets and keeps track of group data/sources/etc. This person distributes these notes to the rest of the group highlighting sections relevant for their parts of the project. |
Checker: | Someone needs to double-check data, bibliographic sources, or graphics for accuracy and correctness. |
Spokesperson/Press Secretary/Webmaster: | This person would be responsible for the technical details of the final product and would be ready to summarize the group's progress and findings to the instructor and to other groups. |
Possible Discussion Roles
Role name | Function |
Facilitator/Encourager: | This student gets discussion moving and keeps it moving, often by asking the other group members questions, sometimes about what they've just been saying. |
Timekeeper: | Someone needs to make sure that the group stays on track and gets through a reasonable amount of material in the given time period. |
Summarizer: | Every so often (perhaps once per question for a list of questions, or at the end for one question), this student provides a summary of the discussion for other students to approve or amend. |
Reflector: | This student will listen to what others say and explain it back in his or her own words, asking the original speaker if the interpretation is correct. |
Elaborator: | This person seeks connections between the current discussion and past topics or overall course themes. |
Roles in groups
Source: This list is reproduced from Roles in groups, University of Queensland, Student Services, retrieved July 10 2017
Role name | Function |
Manager/Leader: |
|
Sceptic/Thinker: |
|
Checker/Recorder: |
|
Conciliator: |
|
Explainer: |
|
Possible roles on teams
Source: The following list is reproduced from the Assign roles document available through What are best practices for designing group projects? (Eberly Center, Carnegie Mellon University, retrieved July 10 2017).
Role name | Function |
Facilitator: | Moderates team discussion, keeps the group on task, and distributes work. |
Recorder: | Takes notes summarizing team discussions and decisions, and keeps all necessary records. |
Reporter: | Serves as group spokesperson to the class or instructor, summarizing the group’s activities and/or conclusions. |
Timekeeper: | Keeps the group aware of time constraints and deadlines and makes sure meetings start on time. |
Devil’s Advocate: | Raises counter-arguments and (constructive) objections, introduces alternative explanations and solutions. |
Harmonizer: | Strives to create a harmonious and positive team atmosphere and reach consensus (while allowing a full expression of ideas.) |
Prioritizer: | Makes sure group focuses on most important issues and does not get caught up in details. |
Explorer: | Seeks to uncover new potential in situations and people (fellow team members but also clients) and explore new areas of inquiry. |
Innovator: | Encourages imagination and contributes new and alternative perspectives and ideas. |
Checker: | Checks to make sure all group members understand the concepts and the group’s conclusions. |
Runner: | Gets needed materials and is the liaison between groups and between their group and the instructor. |
Wildcard: | Assumes the role of any missing member and fills in wherever needed. |
Assigning Roles for Group Work
Source: Assigning Roles for Group Work, Facing History and Ourselves (retrieved July 10 2017).
- facilitator,
- recorder,
- presenter,
- timekeeper,
- artist
Bibliography
- Barkley, E.F., Cross, K.P., & Major, C.H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
- Millis, B. J., and Cottell, P. G., Jr. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. American Council on Education, Series on Higher Education. The Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.
- Smith, K. A. (1996). "Cooperative Learning: Making 'Group work' Work" In Sutherland, T. E., and Bonwell, C. C. (Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 67.