Educational program description grid: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (→The grid) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |'''Items''' | | |'''Items''' | ||
|Project description | |'''Project description''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Meta Data''' | ! colspan="2" |'''Meta Data''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Project name | |Project name | ||
Line 38: | Line 37: | ||
| colspan="2" |'''Structural and organizational variables''' | | colspan="2" |'''Structural and organizational variables''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Can you describe the history of the project ? | |Can you describe the history of the project ? | ||
When was it created and why? | |||
* When was it created and why? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''' Pedagogical aspects ''' | ! colspan="2" |''' Pedagogical aspects ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Is there a vision statement ? Can you describe it ? | |Is there a vision statement ? Can you describe it ? | ||
Line 130: | Line 129: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |What are the particularities related to the practices and culture of the particular subject areas of the program ? | ||
* Tools, procedures, epistemologies, didactics? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" |'''Learning environment''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|List of the technical components (servers) and their version (E.g. Moodle 4.0, Mediawiki 1.35) | |List of the technical components (servers) and their version (E.g. Moodle 4.0, Mediawiki 1.35) | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
* reflexivity support tools. | * reflexivity support tools. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Quality assessment, innovation and change management''' | |What place is reserved for distance and how does this relate to presence? | ||
* What are the different constraints due to organizational hybridization? | |||
* What is the share of pedagogical and non-pedagogical tasks in the environment? | |||
* How is the collaboration and division of labor between the actors organized? | |||
* | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
!'''Quality assessment, innovation and change management''' | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Is there a global quality strategy ? | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Is internal program regulation (self-evaluation and action) formally provided for? | |||
* How does it happen? | |||
* According to what criteria? Is there a quality assessment manual ? | |||
* What changes were already made in the past ? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 154: | Line 171: | ||
* Do learners participate ? | * Do learners participate ? | ||
* Faculty | |||
* Quality officer(s) | |||
* External agency | |||
* Other ? | |||
* | |||
* | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 173: | Line 188: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Organizational aspects''' | ! colspan="2" |'''Organizational and economic aspects''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |How is the program managed? | | |How is the program managed? | ||
Line 183: | Line 197: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | |'''Financial aspects:''' | ||
* What are the | * What are the financing methods? | ||
* What is | * What is its feasibility? | ||
* | * is the project a response to market demands? | ||
* What are the additional costs induced by the project (if it extends or transforms a current project) ? | |||
* What is the breakdown between fixed and variable costs? | |||
* Can the project ultimately be self-financing? If so, in what proportion? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |''' | | |''' Individual variables ''' | ||
* What are the major characteristics of the different actors, both individually and as a group? | |||
* | |||
* Are their expectations, needs, designs and project supported? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | | | ||
* | |||
* | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |'''Political aspects''' | | |'''Political aspects and ideological aspects''' | ||
! | |||
* In what way? Is it part of an explicit policy? Does it respond to a mandate emanating directly from political power? | |- | ||
|Is the project wanted or supported by the political authorities? Institutional? Managers of your companies? | |||
* In what way? | |||
* Is it part of an explicit policy? | |||
* Does it respond to a mandate emanating directly from political power? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | |What values does the environment promote? | ||
* what type of knowledge is promoted by the environment? | |||
* what type of knowledge is promoted by the environment? What type of citizen do we want to form | * What type of citizen do we want to form? | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| |''' | | colspan="2"|''' To conclude… ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |How would you qualify your system and its role in your professional context? | ||
* Does it correspond to what is being done in this context? Is it innovative? If so, in what aspects? | * Does it correspond to what is being done in this context? Is it innovative? If so, in what aspects? | ||
* What aspects are innovative for you in your role? | * What aspects are innovative for you in your role? |
Revision as of 14:41, 19 October 2022
Introduction
This grid is based on the ASPI model (Analyzing, Sustaining, and Piloting Innovation) model was developed by Pearay and Jaccaz [1] in the European Equal project. “It proposes a model, and a vision, that attempts to provide information and scaffolding mainly to university staff but also to policy makers who currently face the initiative of implementing innovation, in all its forms, in the education system. It aims at helping all the different actors, from university managers to university lecturers, involved in the teaching and learning process to answer the following questions: “How do I analyse, guide, and sustain innovation in Higher Education?”, “What kind of information do I need at each stage of the innovation process to make decisions that serve my goals?”, “How do I process the data generated?”, and “How do I feed the results back into the process?”” (Introduction).
Using the grid
It is advisable to describe a project according to this grid as completely as possible. Sections that you cannot fill in should be discussed.
The grid should help you structure a description. You can add other criteria or adapt it to your context. In the right column, you find some comments that specify the expected content.
Definition: "Environment" describes the complete learning environment for a given program, e.g. a degree program, a continuous training certificate, an isolated course. It learning objectives, technical infrastructure, pedagogic strategy, learner evaluation, evaluation etc.
The grid
Items | Project description |
Meta Data | |
---|---|
Project name | |
Authors of this document | |
Author information | |
Status of the document (Version + date, draft, etc.) | |
Name of the project | |
Structural and organizational variables | |
Can you describe the history of the project ?
|
|
In which structure is the project located?
|
|
Who do you think are the actors involved?
|
|
Pedagogical aspects | |
Is there a vision statement ? Can you describe it ?
|
|
What are the main learning objectives at the program level ?
|
|
Is there as preferred pedagogic strategy, instructional design model (or least a preferred type of educational scenario) ? Or several ?
|
|
Is there a preferred learning theory ? Or several ?
|
|
Do learners have the opportunity to negotiate their training path? | |
How is the training organized over time? where is the training held? | |
What are the human and material resources used?
|
|
What types of learning materials exist ?
|
|
What is the nature of the tasks required from the learners?
|
|
Are learning activities defined as coherent scenarios ?
|
|
How is collaborative work integrated into the system?
|
|
How is learning assessed?
|
|
What activities are carried out in person and remotely? | |
What are the particularities related to the practices and culture of the particular subject areas of the program ?
|
|
Learning environment | |
List of the technical components (servers) and their version (E.g. Moodle 4.0, Mediawiki 1.35) | |
What features are used? These are of course related to pedagogic choice.
| |
What place is reserved for distance and how does this relate to presence?
|
|
Quality assessment, innovation and change management | |
Is there a global quality strategy ? | |
Is internal program regulation (self-evaluation and action) formally provided for?
|
|
Who participates in quality assessment cycles, in innovation and change processes ?
|
|
How do you see the consistency (convergence) between objectives, means implemented through the environment, design of the environment and evaluation criteria?
|
|
How are the interactions between the different actors taken into account?
|
|
Organizational and economic aspects | |
How is the program managed?
|
|
Financial aspects:
|
|
Individual variables
|
|
|
|
Political aspects and ideological aspects | |
Is the project wanted or supported by the political authorities? Institutional? Managers of your companies?
|
|
What values does the environment promote?
|
|
To conclude… | |
How would you qualify your system and its role in your professional context?
|
Links
- ↑ PERAYA, Daniel, JACCAZ, Bérénice. Analyser, Soutenir, et Piloter l'Innovation : un modèle “ASPI”. In: TICE 2004. Les TICE ou les Technologies de l'Information et de la Connaissance dans l'Enseignement Supérieur et dans l'Industrie. Université de technologie de Compiègne, 2004. p. 283-289