Talk:5e Learning cycle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(origins?) |
(answer) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
all I can find is this | all I can find is this | ||
[http://www.mgtaylor.com/mgtaylor/glasbead/5Esofed.htm] but I am not sure if this means that they developed and patented the model or just the modelling language (the oh so innovative glyphs and diagrams) based on the pre-existing model. I have also found some non-specific references to a Roger Bybee of BSCS[http://www.bscs.org/] [http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/cl/resource/annbib.htm][http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12605747/index.pdf]. Any one have any ideas? | [http://www.mgtaylor.com/mgtaylor/glasbead/5Esofed.htm] but I am not sure if this means that they developed and patented the model or just the modelling language (the oh so innovative glyphs and diagrams) based on the pre-existing model. I have also found some non-specific references to a Roger Bybee of BSCS[http://www.bscs.org/] [http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/cl/resource/annbib.htm][http://scholar.google.com/url?sa=U&q=http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12605747/index.pdf]. Any one have any ideas? | ||
I figured it out. Roger Bybee is the developer of the 5e learning cycle. | |||
the MG Taylor corporation patented the 5e's of Activity (which I don't think I will cover here) | |||
Revision as of 15:10, 19 June 2006
I am trying to find the origin of this model
all I can find is this [1] but I am not sure if this means that they developed and patented the model or just the modelling language (the oh so innovative glyphs and diagrams) based on the pre-existing model. I have also found some non-specific references to a Roger Bybee of BSCS[2] [3][4]. Any one have any ideas?
I figured it out. Roger Bybee is the developer of the 5e learning cycle.
the MG Taylor corporation patented the 5e's of Activity (which I don't think I will cover here)