Category:Position paper: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
These position papers were written by students enrolled during the Fall, 2013 session of course
These position papers were written by students enrolled during the Fall, 2013 session of course
Education 6620, Issues and Trends in Educational Computing at [http://www.mun.ca Memorial University of Newfoundland], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newfoundland_and_Labrador Newfoundland and Labrador], Canada. Each paper in this category relies on evidence from a minimum of 20 peer-reviewed studies specifically on the topic.  
Education 6620, Issues and Trends in Educational Computing at [http://www.mun.ca Memorial University of Newfoundland], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newfoundland_and_Labrador Newfoundland and Labrador], Canada. Each paper in this category relies on evidence from a minimum of 20 peer-reviewed studies specifically on the topic.  
<p>
 
From a pedagogical perspective, this assignment was designed with the following outcomes in mind:  
From a pedagogical perspective, this assignment was designed with the following outcomes in mind:
1. Build a knowledge base related to issues and trends in educational computing;
1. Build a knowledge base related to issues and trends in educational computing;
2. develop skills of argumentation and critical thinking;
2. develop skills of argumentation and critical thinking;
3. learn to provide evidence-based support for claims related to educational technology;
3. learn to provide evidence-based support for claims related to educational technology;
4. gain knowledge of the content of the major peer-reviewed journals in educational technology;
4. gain knowledge of the content of the major peer-reviewed journals in educational technology;
5. be initiated into the community of practice of disseminators of research.
5. be initiated into the community of practice of disseminators of research.


<p> Students were given the following scenario:
Students were given the following scenario:
<p>
 
Image that, as an education technologist, you are providing expert consultation to an educational organization such as a school, department of education, university, etc. The organization has a problem that relates to face-to-face teaching and learning. As an education technologist, you analyse the problem and provide evidence from the research literature about how information and communication technologies (ICTs) can solve the problem. You present a compelling overview of the problem, a convincing ICT solution, as well as solution to the counter arguments against use of ICTS for the specific problem.
Image that, as an education technologist, you are providing expert consultation to an educational organization such as a school, department of education, university, etc. The organization has a problem that relates to face-to-face teaching and learning. As an education technologist, you analyse the problem and provide evidence from the research literature about how information and communication technologies (ICTs) can solve the problem. You present a compelling overview of the problem, a convincing ICT solution, as well as solution to the counter arguments against use of ICTS for the specific problem.

Revision as of 00:27, 19 September 2013

These position papers were written by students enrolled during the Fall, 2013 session of course Education 6620, Issues and Trends in Educational Computing at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Each paper in this category relies on evidence from a minimum of 20 peer-reviewed studies specifically on the topic.

From a pedagogical perspective, this assignment was designed with the following outcomes in mind:

1. Build a knowledge base related to issues and trends in educational computing;

2. develop skills of argumentation and critical thinking;

3. learn to provide evidence-based support for claims related to educational technology;

4. gain knowledge of the content of the major peer-reviewed journals in educational technology;

5. be initiated into the community of practice of disseminators of research.

Students were given the following scenario:

Image that, as an education technologist, you are providing expert consultation to an educational organization such as a school, department of education, university, etc. The organization has a problem that relates to face-to-face teaching and learning. As an education technologist, you analyse the problem and provide evidence from the research literature about how information and communication technologies (ICTs) can solve the problem. You present a compelling overview of the problem, a convincing ICT solution, as well as solution to the counter arguments against use of ICTS for the specific problem.