Evaluation: Difference between revisions
(using an external editor) |
(using an external editor) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Scriven, Michael (1999). The nature of evaluation part i: relation to psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(11). Retrieved March 7, 2006 from [http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=11] | * Scriven, Michael (1999). The nature of evaluation part i: relation to psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(11). Retrieved March 7, 2006 from [http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=11] | ||
[[Category: Design methodologies]] |
Revision as of 10:36, 7 March 2006
Definition
- See learner assessment (aliased from student evaluation)
- See course evaluation
- See teacher evaluation
Is there a field of evaluation ?
Here is a longer quote from Michael Scriven (1999):
The discipline of evaluation is devoted to the systematic determination of merit, worth, or significance. It is divided into fields according to the type of entity evaluated--for example, program evaluation, or personnel evaluation--and there are more than twenty of these recognized fields of evaluation. Some specific aspects of evaluation methodology have been developed to solve problems of evaluation in only one or a few of these fields (e.g., bias control in panel selection, systematic side-effect identification in program evaluation, road-testing techniques in product evaluation). However, the underlying logic of the process of evaluation--for example, the difference between merit and worth, or between grading and ranking--and a substantial portion of its general methodology (e.g., techniques of measurement, causality determination, applying the requirement of informed consent) are shared across all or many of these fields
References
- Scriven, Michael (1999). The nature of evaluation part i: relation to psychology. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(11). Retrieved March 7, 2006 from [1]