COAP:COAP-2110/grading form: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
| class="data lighten" | Missing
| class="data lighten" | Missing
|-
|-
| class="data" | Purpose, usefulness and usability
| class="data" | Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.5 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
|-
Line 23: Line 23:
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.9 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
Line 32: Line 32:
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
Line 57: Line 57:
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Global coherence
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
Line 77: Line 69:
|}
|}


out of 4.4
out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0)

Revision as of 20:14, 14 March 2010

Grading form - Mini projects COAP 2110

Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators
unsatisfactory Just passing Meet expectations Very Good Outstanding Missing
Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0.5 points) (0 points)
Artwork and esthetic appeal (0.4 points) (0.6 points) (0.8 points) (1.0 points) (1.2 points) (0 points)
Complexity / originality (0.4 points) (0.6 points) (0.8 points) (1.0 points) (1.1 points) (0 points)
Task requirements (0 points) (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
Flash file documentation and comments in AS code (0.1 points) (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
Absence of errors and strange objects (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
On time (0 points) (0 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)

out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0)