Educational program description grid: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Meta Data''' | |'''Meta Data''' | ||
| | |||
|- | |||
|Project name | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 90: | Line 93: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |What types of learning materials exist ? | ||
* Textbooks, online textbooks, online hypertext, video, multimedia presentations, interactive multimedia, .... | |||
* Which are open ? | |||
* Are textbook materials available in several formats, e.g. for offline reading | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|What is the nature of the tasks required | |What is the nature of the tasks required from the learners? | ||
* Assignements | |||
* Other participation | |||
* Classes, .... | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Are learning activities defined as coherent scenarios ? | |Are learning activities defined as coherent scenarios ? | ||
* If so, are you using some king of design language or templates/forms ? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|How is collaborative work integrated into the system? Is group work present? | |How is collaborative work integrated into the system? | ||
* Is group work present? | |||
* Are there collective activities | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 117: | Line 133: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''Learning environment''' | | colspan="2" |'''Learning environment''' | ||
|- | |||
|List of the technical components (servers) and their version (E.g. Moodle 4.0, Mediawiki 1.35) | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |What features are used? These are of course related to pedagogic choice. | ||
* spaces for communication and collaboration, | |||
* resource tools; | |||
* support tools for various types of activities (debates, projects, case studies, research, etc.); | |||
* group work support tools; | |||
* support tools for the active participation of learners (social presence, informal communication); | |||
* reflexivity support tools. | |||
|- | |||
|'''Quality assessment, innovation and change management''' | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | | ||
* | Who participates in quality assessment cycles, in innovation and change processes ? | ||
* Do learners participate ? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Is project regulation (self-evaluation-and-action) formally provided? | ||
* How does it happen? | |||
* According to what criteria? Is there a quality assessment manual ? | |||
* What changes were already made to the environment? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |How do you see the consistency (convergence) between objectives, means implemented through the environment, design of the environment and evaluation criteria? | ||
* Also called alignment | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|How are the interactions between the different actors taken into account? | |||
* Are there bodies where the program (or elements of it) are discussed | |||
* Who takes decisions ? | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|'''Organizational aspects''' | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| |How is the program managed? | |||
* By whom? | |||
* Can you provide an organigram ? | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |What place is reserved for distance and how does this relate to presence? | ||
* What are the different constraints due to organizational hybridization? | |||
* What is the share of pedagogical and non-pedagogical tasks in the environment? | |||
* How is the collaboration and division of labor between the actors organized? | |||
* What are the different constraints due to organizational hybridization? What is the share of pedagogical and non-pedagogical tasks in the environment? How is the collaboration and division of labor between the actors organized? | |||
* | |||
* | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 14:28, 19 October 2022
Introduction
This grid is based on the ASPI model (Analyzing, Sustaining, and Piloting Innovation) model was developed by Pearay and Jaccaz [1] in the European Equal project. “It proposes a model, and a vision, that attempts to provide information and scaffolding mainly to university staff but also to policy makers who currently face the initiative of implementing innovation, in all its forms, in the education system. It aims at helping all the different actors, from university managers to university lecturers, involved in the teaching and learning process to answer the following questions: “How do I analyse, guide, and sustain innovation in Higher Education?”, “What kind of information do I need at each stage of the innovation process to make decisions that serve my goals?”, “How do I process the data generated?”, and “How do I feed the results back into the process?”” (Introduction).
Using the grid
It is advisable to describe a project according to this grid as completely as possible. Sections that you cannot fill in should be discussed.
The grid should help you structure a description. You can add other criteria or adapt it to your context. In the right column, you find some comments that specify the expected content.
Definition: "Environment" describes the complete learning environment for a given program, e.g. a degree program, a continuous training certificate, an isolated course. It learning objectives, technical infrastructure, pedagogic strategy, learner evaluation, evaluation etc.
The grid
Items | Project description |
Meta Data | |
Project name | |
Authors of this document | |
Author information | |
Status of the document (Version + date, draft, etc.) | |
Name of the project | |
Structural and organizational variables | |
Can you describe the history of the project ?
When was it created and why? |
|
In which structure is the project located?
|
|
Who do you think are the actors involved?
|
|
Pedagogical aspects | |
Is there a vision statement ? Can you describe it ?
|
|
What are the main learning objectives at the program level ?
|
|
Is there as preferred pedagogic strategy, instructional design model (or least a preferred type of educational scenario) ? Or several ?
|
|
Is there a preferred learning theory ? Or several ?
|
|
Do learners have the opportunity to negotiate their training path? | |
How is the training organized over time? where is the training held? | |
What are the human and material resources used?
|
|
What types of learning materials exist ?
|
|
What is the nature of the tasks required from the learners?
|
|
Are learning activities defined as coherent scenarios ?
|
|
How is collaborative work integrated into the system?
|
|
How is learning assessed?
|
|
What activities are carried out in person and remotely? | |
Learning environment | |
List of the technical components (servers) and their version (E.g. Moodle 4.0, Mediawiki 1.35) | |
What features are used? These are of course related to pedagogic choice.
| |
Quality assessment, innovation and change management | |
Who participates in quality assessment cycles, in innovation and change processes ?
|
|
Is project regulation (self-evaluation-and-action) formally provided?
|
|
How do you see the consistency (convergence) between objectives, means implemented through the environment, design of the environment and evaluation criteria?
|
|
How are the interactions between the different actors taken into account?
|
|
Organizational aspects | |
How is the program managed?
|
|
What place is reserved for distance and how does this relate to presence?
|
|
Economic aspects
12. What are the financing methods? What is its feasibility?
|
|
Disciplinary aspects
13. What are the particularities related to the practices and culture of the field?
|
|
Political aspects
14. Is the project wanted or supported by the political authorities? Institutional? Managers of your companies?
|
|
Ideological aspects
15. What values does the environment promote?
|
|
Individual variables
16. What are the major characteristics of the different actors, both individually and as a group? Are their expectations, needs, designs and project supported? |
|
To conclude…
17. How would you qualify your system and its role in your professional context?
|
Links
- ↑ PERAYA, Daniel, JACCAZ, Bérénice. Analyser, Soutenir, et Piloter l'Innovation : un modèle “ASPI”. In: TICE 2004. Les TICE ou les Technologies de l'Information et de la Connaissance dans l'Enseignement Supérieur et dans l'Industrie. Université de technologie de Compiègne, 2004. p. 283-289