COAP:COAP-2110/grading form: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | Artwork and esthetic appeal | | class="data" | Artwork and esthetic appeal | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0. | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.9 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points) | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | Complexity / originality | | class="data" | Complexity / originality | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | |||
|- | |||
| class="data" | On time | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
Revision as of 20:06, 14 March 2010
Grading form - Mini projects COAP 2110
| Objective/Criteria | Performance Indicators | |||||
| unsatisfactory | Just passing | Meet expectations | Very Good | Outstanding | Missing | |
| Purpose, usefulness and usability | (0.1 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Artwork and esthetic appeal | (0.4 points) | (0.6 points) | (0.9 points) | (1.1 points) | (1.2 points) | (0 points) |
| Complexity / originality | (0.4 points) | (0.6 points) | (0.8 points) | (1 points) | (1.1 points) | (0 points) |
| Task requirements | (0 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Flash file documentation and comments in AS code | (0.1 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Absence of errors and strange objects | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Global coherence | (0 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| On time | (0 points) | (0 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
out of 4.4