Inquiry-based learning: Difference between revisions
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==definition== | ==definition== | ||
Inquiry-based learning is supported by constructivist and socio-constructivist theories of learning (Eick & Reed, 2002). | Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is supported by constructivist and socio-constructivist theories of learning (Eick & Reed, 2002). | ||
(See [[constructivism]], [[socio-constructivism]] for a definition) | (See [[constructivism]], [[socio-constructivism]] for a definition) | ||
Inquiry-based learning is often describe like a cycle or a spiral, which implies formulation of a question, investigation, creation of a solution or an appropriate response, discussion and reflexion about the result (Bishop et al., 2004). | |||
This is so an learning process by exploration of natural or material world, which leads the learner to ask some questions and do discoveries in the seeking of new understanding. | |||
With this pedagogy, children can learn science by doing it (Aubé & David,2003). The purpose is conceptual change. | |||
Inquiry-based learning is so a students-centred process students-lead process. The purpose is to engage students in an active learning ideally based on their own questions. Learning activities are organized in cyclic way, independently of the subject. Each question lead to the creation of new ideas and other questions. | |||
IBL follows from [[socio-constructivism]] because of collaborative work in which students find ressources, use tools ans ressources given by inquiry partners.Thus, students make progress by work-sharing, talk and building on everyone's work. | |||
==Models== | ==Models== |
Revision as of 14:49, 19 April 2005
definition
Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is supported by constructivist and socio-constructivist theories of learning (Eick & Reed, 2002). (See constructivism, socio-constructivism for a definition)
Inquiry-based learning is often describe like a cycle or a spiral, which implies formulation of a question, investigation, creation of a solution or an appropriate response, discussion and reflexion about the result (Bishop et al., 2004).
This is so an learning process by exploration of natural or material world, which leads the learner to ask some questions and do discoveries in the seeking of new understanding.
With this pedagogy, children can learn science by doing it (Aubé & David,2003). The purpose is conceptual change.
Inquiry-based learning is so a students-centred process students-lead process. The purpose is to engage students in an active learning ideally based on their own questions. Learning activities are organized in cyclic way, independently of the subject. Each question lead to the creation of new ideas and other questions.
IBL follows from socio-constructivism because of collaborative work in which students find ressources, use tools ans ressources given by inquiry partners.Thus, students make progress by work-sharing, talk and building on everyone's work.
Models
Mettre le modèle cyclique
Tools
Websites:
PostNuke Module :
References
Lattion, S.(2005). Développement et implémentation d'un module d'apprentissage par investigation (inquiry-based learning) au sein d'une plateforme de type PostNuke. Genève, Suisse. Mémoire de diplôme non-publié
Internet: http://tecfa.unige.ch/staf/staf-i/lattion/staf25/memoire.pdf
Ackermann, E.K. (2004). Constructing Knowledge and Transforming The World. In Tokoro, M. & Steels, L. (2004). A Learning Zone Of One's Own. pp17-35. IOS Press
Aubé, M. & David, R. (2003). Le programme d’adoption du monde de Darwin : une exploitation concrète des TIC selon une approche socio-constructiviste. In Taurisson, A. & Senteni, A.(2003). Pédagogie.net : L’essor des communautés d’apprentissage. pp 49-72.
Bishop, A.P.,Bertram, B.C.,Lunsford, K.J. & al. (2004). Supporting Community Inquiry with Digital Resources. Journal Of Digital Information, 5 (3).
Chakroun, M. (2003). Conception et mise en place d'un module pédagogique pour portails communautaires Postnuke. Insat, Tunis. Mémoire de licence non publié.
De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W.R. (1997). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. University of Twente, The Netherland
Duckworth, E. (1986). Inventing Density. Monography by the North Dakota Study Group on Evaluation, Grand Forks, ND, 1986.
Internet : www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/classroom/inventingdensity.html
Drie, J. van, Boxtel, C. van, & Kanselaar, G. (2003). Supporting historical reasoning in CSCL. In: B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.). Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 93-103. ISBN 1-4020-1383-3.
Eick, C.J. & Reed, C.J. (2002). What Makes an Inquiry Oriented Science Teacher? The Influence of Learning Histories on Student Teacher Role Identity and Practice. Science Teacher Education, 86, pp 401-416.
Gurtner, J-L. (1996). L'apport de Piaget aux études pédagogiques et didactiques. Actes du colloque international Jean Piaget, avril 1996, sous la direction de Ahmed Chabchoub. Publications de l'institut Supérieur de l'Education et de la Formation Continue.
Kasl, E & Yorks, L. (2002). Collaborative Inquiry for Adult Learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 94, summer 2002.
Keys, C.W. & Bryan, L.A. (2001). Co-Constructing Inquiry-Based Science with Teachers : Essential Research for Lasting Reform. Journal Of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (6), pp 631-645.
McKenzie, J. (1999). Scaffolding for Success. From Now On, ,The Educationnal Technology Journal, 9(4).
Nespor, J.(1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, pp 317-328.
Vermont Elementary Science Project. (1995). Inquiry Based Science: What Does It Look Like? Connect Magazine, March-April 1995, p. 13. published by Synergy Learning.
Internet: http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/classroom/inquiry_based.html
Villavicencio, J. (2000). Inquiry in Kindergarten. Connect Magazine, 13 (4), March/April 2000. Synergy Learning Publication.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A. & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction ,11, pp 381-419.
Watson, B. & Kopnicek, R. (1990). Teaching for Conceptual Change : confronting Children Experience. Phi Delta Kappan, May 1990, pp 680-684.