Collaboration and wikis: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(6620, MUN, collaborative learning, Memorial University, Adam, Binet, Technology, Education, Wiki)
 
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When investigating technology trends and learning approaches there is literally countless journal articles on each which could, individually, make up a thesis on their own. However, throughout this discourse, we will investigate the ever increasing trend of social software (which includes, but is not limited to the likes of Facebook, Wikispaces, Ning, LinkedIn, and more) and the rise of collaborative learning approaches. To first begin, we must understand what the notion of “social software” is. It appears the phrase was coined or first made popular by Clay Shirky (2003, para. 2), who described it simply as, “It's software that supports group interaction.” Often this software has taken the form of a website on the internet which opens it to a massive worldwide audience. The marriage of these two trends, one a tool to enhance technology and the other a learning approach can be seen as both a novel one and something worthwhile for teachers and educators to investigate. As Doringer (2008, p. 11) argues, “our society is still far from efficiently exploiting the full potential of technology enhanced learning” . It is clear to many in the field this is a fairly broad, but correct statement. There exists isolated pockets of educators and organizations who have integrated technology extremely well, yet there is a large majority who have not as well. The sort of collaborative learning approach which can be seen as one of the strongest proponents of this online trend of social software needs to exists both online and offline, learning and sharing ideas and as Doringer (2008, p. 11) proposes: “transforming the way we teach and learn requires a collective effort engaging all players fostering education and lifelong learning.”. The purpose of this essay is to assert the idea that the social software trend we have been witnessing over the past decade in combination with collaborative learning techniques will lead to the better delivery of education and enhanced learning for both the student and the instructor.
==Introduction==


When looking at the idea of collaborative learning as a means of educating, it is important to know there is a school of thought which strongly supports this method of learning. One of the best ways to encourage this collaborative learning is through the use of social software and online web tools. As Frydenberg (2008, Introduction, para. 3) states, in discussing the role of wiki websites, “Because students and faculty can both post information to the wiki, the role of the instructor changes from being the single authority to being a partner with the students in their own learning”. The concept of collaborative learning has come further in prominence in our world and as Choy and Ng (2007, Social Software and Learning, para. 1) suggest, “…changes in our understanding of practices of creativity and innovation - from the idea of the isolated individual to the concept of 'communities of practice', where reflection and feedback are important collaborative processes” has proven to be a powerful and worthwhile means of educating and learning.” By and large, one of the most powerful and useful social software options which exists is that of the “Wiki”, which is explained by Kok (2009, Definition, para. 1) as, “…the most representative tool that enables the new Web 2.0 philosophy that is defined by user participation, openness and network effects…. this social software is an enabler of social interaction, collaboration and information sharing, promoting the growth of communities as user groups.
This Wiki explores [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_learning Collaborative learning] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki Wikis].  


As we continue to see the growth of internet education based technological advancements and as we continue to research various learning styles, we develop an overall sense of what has strong potential and what may not. A large part of the problem with the technological advancements is the desire to adopt them immediately without critically analyzing them. Koh (2009 Introduction, para. 3) outlines the argument and issue concisely, stating, “…new studies have examined the challenges of group work from a student perspective. Therefore, to improve our practice, we need to expand our knowledge of what students find challenging, as well as beneficial, about group work in online settings. .” As it’s suggest by Järvelä, et al. (2007, p. 71), “…only a few studies give detailed arguments as to what are these new opportunities in terms of learning interaction and collaboration” in terms of technology in education. If these sort of novel approaches can embrace not only the technology but also incorporate a learning style such as collaborative learning, then there may be a truly effective learning environment occurring. When scrutinizing the notion of using social software for educational ends, Dalsgaard and Mathiasen (2008, Introduction, para. 1) make an interesting and important point, stating that “…the term has not grown out of an educational discussion, and social software has not been developed specifically for learning.”
;[[User:ianwiggs | Ian Wigglesworth]]


The further democratization of the educational process at institutions across the globe can be seen thanks to the incorporation of social software in the teaching and learning process. It appears, and it has been argued throughout this essay, that collaborative learning amongst learners and social software can, indeed, and often does, go hand in hand. The continued rise in the inception and wide-spread use of both technology and the collaborative learning method will lead to better widespread access to education. Dalsgaard and Mathiasen (2008, Conclusion, para. 1) conclude their findings with an excellent point, arguing that, “that learning processes are not controlled by the educational institution, and that learning and communication are not limited to the teaching and the use of resources provided by the educational institution”. Increased and continual research is pivotal to realizing the power that both social software and collaborative learning can play a major role in our traditional learning and education system.
:''Memorial University of Newfoundland''


==Web 2.0 and Wikis==   


[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0 Web 2.0] applications, specifically Wikis, are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_application web-based] media that have the characteristics that allow learners to meet in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_world virtual world] and provide them opportunities to partake in authentic, collaborative tasks [http://www.springerlink.com/content/u32031x14578t458/ (Laurason & Alterman, 2009)]. A Wiki is a Web 2.0 tool that allows users to create rich [http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/Archives/JanFeb06/p28-33.pdf (Evans, 2006)], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_learning collaborative learning] environments where users, either in a private or public forum, can come together and collaborate on tasks assigned in educational contexts [http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf (Chao & Parker, 2007)]. Collaborative learning, according to Smith and MacGregor [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf (1992)], is often linked to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiential_learning experiential learning], in that students are allowed to explore topics on their own and within groups.  In this way, knowledge is created and not simply absorbed based on information given by the instructor.  Kahn [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ850031&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ850031 (2009)] posits that Wikis promote interaction between students and instructors. Therefore, instructors can provide guidance to help direct learning, not just relate information. [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pd Smith and MacGregor] stress that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditional_education traditional teaching methods] may still exist in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_working_environment collaborative environments]; however, these methods are used in tandem with discussions and group work, which are both widely associated with collaboration. Wikis allow learners to engage in [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1501595 collaborative tasks], for example group discussions, in either a [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synchronous synchronous] or an [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/asynchronous asynchronous] manner [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a907453942~db=all~jumptype=rss (Peterson, 2009)].


Bibliography
==Collaborative learning in the classroom and Wikis==
Choy, S. O., & Ng, K. C. (2007). Implementing wiki software for supplementing online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 23 (2), 209-226. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/choy.html
Dalsgaard, C., & Mathiasen, H. (2008). Self-Organized Learning Environments and University Students’ Use of Social Software: A Systems Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning , 5 (2). Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Feb_08/article01.htm
Smith and MacGregor [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf (1992)] identify four main reasons for the use of collaborative learning in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classroom classrooms].  Firstly, learners must be able to integrate new material into their existing body of knowledge in an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_learning active way]. Active approaches are considered to be a [http://saskschoolboards.ca/research/instruction/97-07.htm constructive process], whereby learners are constructing, or building upon [http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/learning/lr1pk.htm prior knowledge] [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ820640&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ820640 (Casey, 2008]; [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/jcal/2009/00000025/00000003/art00004 Gijlers, Saab, Van Joolingen, De Jong, & Van Hout-Wolters, 2009)]. Secondly, for information to be valuable to learners, it must be presented in [http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/kig99590.htm authentic and believable contexts], often linked to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem-based_learning problem-based learning] [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Smith & MacGregor)]. Once learners are in control of their learning, they can more easily adapt new knowledge to more varied contexts. Wikis allow students to engage in collaborative, and thus [http://oldsite.clarity-innovations.com/about/blog/pgrant/making-discussions-meaningful meaningful discussions] with their peers [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.94.6443&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Schaffert, Gruber, & Westenthaler, 2006)].  Therefore, learners learn from one another.  [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf Smith and MacGregor] also found that [http://books.google.ca/books?id=hL6Hw9q9IbMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=student+diversity&source=bl&ots=baFqP-mq6l&sig=82fGQf864BFZipCKCZDO4nk4wCo&hl=en&ei=bI9vS9T0CoGPtgfWyMWOBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CA4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false student diversity] and each learner’s unique background help to increase the learning. To ensure that each student finds value in new material, teachers must allow learners to bring [http://www.news-medical.net/news/2009/05/13/Previous-experiences-invaluable-for-complex-decision-making-according-to-new-brain-research.aspx previous experiences] into discussions and solutions [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Smith & MacGregor)]. [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf Smith and MacGregor] state that, without the collaborative approach, students who do not fit into traditional learning models would be greatly disadvantaged. However, Howe [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 (2009)] argues that  collaborative work does not work well when individuals within a group have a more similar outlook on the problem.  In areas where diversity of experience is not wide-ranging, the collaborative approach cannot reach its full potential [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 (Howe)]. Furthermore, [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/jcal/2009/00000025/00000003/art00004 Gijlers, Saab, Van Joolingen, De Jong and Van Hout-Wolters] demonstrate the necessity of [http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/consensus_building/ consensus building] before students move on with the task.  When there are different approaches to solving the problem, the group must agree on the path that will be taken, otherwise the task becomes frustrating.
Dorninger, C., & Schrack, C. (2008). Future Learning Strategy and ePortfolios in Education. International Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Learning (IJET) , 3 (1), 11-14. Retrieved from http://online-journals.org/i-jet/article/view/251/234
 
Frydenberg, M. (2008). Wikis as a Tool for Collaborative Course Management. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 4 (2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no2/frydenberg0608.htm
An interesting aspect of Wikis is that, while they can be made private, if learners do have similar beliefs regarding a topic, Wikis can be made public. With a public wiki, students can connect with external users. These connections can lead the new, larger group to discover a greater variety of ideas, which will allow for the collaborative process to reach its full potential [http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf (Alexander, 2006)]. Smith and MacGregor[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf (1992)] posit that humans are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social social beings]; sharing knowledge and information is a bonding experience where the group is working towards a single ultimate goal.  Group work necessitates that students work on several tasks that, when combined, lead to achieving the main goal. Similar to Smith and MacGregor's point about social connections, Lund [http://www.mendeley.com/research/wikis-a-collective-approach-to-language-production/ (2008)] argues that Wikis facilitate social interactions of their users. In order to use a Wiki, students must connect with the other members who are participating in the [http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/aq/online/environment.html online environment], encouraging the social connectedness of the group. Combining social interaction with this type of collaboration makes [http://www.idiagram.com/CP/cpprocess.html understanding of complex problems] more challenging, without being overwhelming, due to the support of the rest of the group.
Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and Regulating Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society, , 10 (4), 71-79. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/10_4/8.pdf
 
Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student Perceptions of Group Work in an Online Course: Benefits and Challenges. The Journal of Distance Education , 23 (9), 69-92. Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/477/905
==Asynchronous collaborative learning==
Kok, A. (2009). Understanding the Wiki Technology. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning , 6 (10). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Oct_09/article02.htm
 
Shirky, C. (2003, July 1). Shirky: A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy. Retrieved January 21, 2010, from Clay Shirky's Writings About the Internet: http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
According to Kimpulainen and Kaartinen [http://www.jstor.org/pss/20152719 (2003)], the ability to resolve conflicts in collaborative environments promotes more enhanced learning.  The authors state that one type of collaborative learning, called Joint Construction, requires much less work than the consensus building method described above [http://www.jstor.org/pss/20152719. (Kimpulainen & Kaartinen)].  In the Joint Construction process, only one person needs to present a feasible solution and the rest of the group need only accept it [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 (Howe, 2009)].  According to [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 Howe], this is a much easier task, because comparison of different perspectives is not necessary to arrive at a solution.  Wikis can potentially promote this type of interaction by allowing learners the opportunity to collaborate on a project where each learner’s ideas are valued; however, it is in the process that learning occurs  [http://www.citeulike.org/user/rickl/article/3065332 (Mac & Coninum 2008)]. [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 Howe] states that students who work in collaborative settings are often able to provide solutions or responses far above what was achieved during the group task.  This finding might indicate that collaborative environments stimulate something within learners that allows them to continue [http://tip.psychology.org/miller.html processing information] and adding to it based on their individual interpretation of the discussion [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g62884mx30422448/ (Chan, 2001)]. As Chao and Parker [http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf (2007)] posit, these discussions can broaden those that might occur in the classroom and lead to a [http://www.engsc.ac.uk/er/theory/learning.asp deeper learning] experience. Wikis, when used effectively in conjunction with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_practice best practices], create [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_working_environment learning environments] where learners work together with peers and instructors to facilitate learning through a collaborative approach [http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf (Chao & Parker)].
 
==References==
 
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? ''Educause Review, 41''(2) (March/April). Retrieved November 2006 from
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf
 
Casey, H. K. (2008). [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ820640&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ820640 Engaging the disengaged Using learning clubs to motivate struggling adolescent readers and writers.] ''Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52''(4), 284-294.
 
Chan, C. K. K. (2001). [http://www.springerlink.com/content/g62884mx30422448/ Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information.] ''Instructional Science, 29''(6), 443-479.
 
Chao, J & Parker, K. (2007). [http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf Wiki as a teaching tool.] ''Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3'', 57 – 72.
 
Evans, P. (2006). The wiki factor. BizEd, January/February, 28-32. Retrieved November 2006 from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/Archives/JanFeb06/p28-33.pdf
 
Gijlers, H., Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/jcal/2009/00000025/00000003/art00004 Interaction between tool and talk: How instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments.] ''Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25''(3), 252-267.
 
Howe, C. (2009). [http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ855087&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ855087 Collaborative group work in middle childhood Joint construction, unresolved contradiction and the growth of knowledge.] ''Human Development, 52''(4), 215(25)-240.  
 
Kahn, S. (2009) [http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ850031&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ850031: Wonderful Wikis and Internet forums.] ''Science and Children, 46''(9), 27-31.
 
Kumpulainen, K., & Kaartinen, S. (2003). [http://www.jstor.org/pss/20152719 The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads.] ''The Journal of Experimental Education, 71''(4), 333-370.  
 
Laursson, J & Alterman, R. (2009). [http://www.citeulike.org/user/charoy/article/5871892 Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning.] ''Computer-Supported Learning, 4'', 371-402.
 
Lund, A. (2008). [http://www.mendeley.com/research/wikis-a-collective-approach-to-language-production/ Wikis a collective approach to language production.] ''ReCALL, 20''(1), 35-54.
 
Mac, B. & Coninum, D. (2008). [http://www.citeulike.org/user/rickl/article/3065332 Using Wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong.] ''An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36''(3), 437-455.
 
Peterson, E. (2009). [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a907453942~db=all~jumptype=rss Using a Wiki to enhance cooperative learning in a real analysis course.] ''PRIMUS, 1'', 18 - 28.
 
Schaffert, S., Gruber, A. & Westenthaler, R. (2006). [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.94.6443&rep=rep1&type=pdf A semantic wiki for collaborative knowledge formation.] In S.
Reich, G. Güntner, T. Pellegrini, A. & Wahler (Eds.): ''Semantic Content Engineering'', Austria: Trauner Verlag. Retrieved November 2006
[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.94.6443&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://www.salzburgresearch.at/research/gfx/SemsikiForCollKnowForm_20060120.pdf.]
 
Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.128.6526&rep=rep1&type=pdf What is collaborative learning?] ''Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education'', 9-22.
 
 
[[Category:Learning approaches and technology trends]]
[[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:Collaborative learning]]

Latest revision as of 14:59, 20 February 2010

Introduction

This Wiki explores Collaborative learning and Wikis.

Ian Wigglesworth
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Web 2.0 and Wikis

Web 2.0 applications, specifically Wikis, are web-based media that have the characteristics that allow learners to meet in the virtual world and provide them opportunities to partake in authentic, collaborative tasks (Laurason & Alterman, 2009). A Wiki is a Web 2.0 tool that allows users to create rich (Evans, 2006), collaborative learning environments where users, either in a private or public forum, can come together and collaborate on tasks assigned in educational contexts (Chao & Parker, 2007). Collaborative learning, according to Smith and MacGregor (1992), is often linked to experiential learning, in that students are allowed to explore topics on their own and within groups. In this way, knowledge is created and not simply absorbed based on information given by the instructor. Kahn (2009) posits that Wikis promote interaction between students and instructors. Therefore, instructors can provide guidance to help direct learning, not just relate information. Smith and MacGregor stress that traditional teaching methods may still exist in collaborative environments; however, these methods are used in tandem with discussions and group work, which are both widely associated with collaboration. Wikis allow learners to engage in collaborative tasks, for example group discussions, in either a synchronous or an asynchronous manner (Peterson, 2009).

Collaborative learning in the classroom and Wikis

Smith and MacGregor (1992) identify four main reasons for the use of collaborative learning in classrooms. Firstly, learners must be able to integrate new material into their existing body of knowledge in an active way. Active approaches are considered to be a constructive process, whereby learners are constructing, or building upon prior knowledge (Casey, 2008; Gijlers, Saab, Van Joolingen, De Jong, & Van Hout-Wolters, 2009). Secondly, for information to be valuable to learners, it must be presented in authentic and believable contexts, often linked to problem-based learning (Smith & MacGregor). Once learners are in control of their learning, they can more easily adapt new knowledge to more varied contexts. Wikis allow students to engage in collaborative, and thus meaningful discussions with their peers (Schaffert, Gruber, & Westenthaler, 2006). Therefore, learners learn from one another. Smith and MacGregor also found that student diversity and each learner’s unique background help to increase the learning. To ensure that each student finds value in new material, teachers must allow learners to bring previous experiences into discussions and solutions (Smith & MacGregor). Smith and MacGregor state that, without the collaborative approach, students who do not fit into traditional learning models would be greatly disadvantaged. However, Howe (2009) argues that collaborative work does not work well when individuals within a group have a more similar outlook on the problem. In areas where diversity of experience is not wide-ranging, the collaborative approach cannot reach its full potential (Howe). Furthermore, Gijlers, Saab, Van Joolingen, De Jong and Van Hout-Wolters demonstrate the necessity of consensus building before students move on with the task. When there are different approaches to solving the problem, the group must agree on the path that will be taken, otherwise the task becomes frustrating.

An interesting aspect of Wikis is that, while they can be made private, if learners do have similar beliefs regarding a topic, Wikis can be made public. With a public wiki, students can connect with external users. These connections can lead the new, larger group to discover a greater variety of ideas, which will allow for the collaborative process to reach its full potential (Alexander, 2006). Smith and MacGregor(1992) posit that humans are social beings; sharing knowledge and information is a bonding experience where the group is working towards a single ultimate goal. Group work necessitates that students work on several tasks that, when combined, lead to achieving the main goal. Similar to Smith and MacGregor's point about social connections, Lund (2008) argues that Wikis facilitate social interactions of their users. In order to use a Wiki, students must connect with the other members who are participating in the online environment, encouraging the social connectedness of the group. Combining social interaction with this type of collaboration makes understanding of complex problems more challenging, without being overwhelming, due to the support of the rest of the group.

Asynchronous collaborative learning

According to Kimpulainen and Kaartinen (2003), the ability to resolve conflicts in collaborative environments promotes more enhanced learning. The authors state that one type of collaborative learning, called Joint Construction, requires much less work than the consensus building method described above (Kimpulainen & Kaartinen). In the Joint Construction process, only one person needs to present a feasible solution and the rest of the group need only accept it (Howe, 2009). According to Howe, this is a much easier task, because comparison of different perspectives is not necessary to arrive at a solution. Wikis can potentially promote this type of interaction by allowing learners the opportunity to collaborate on a project where each learner’s ideas are valued; however, it is in the process that learning occurs (Mac & Coninum 2008). Howe states that students who work in collaborative settings are often able to provide solutions or responses far above what was achieved during the group task. This finding might indicate that collaborative environments stimulate something within learners that allows them to continue processing information and adding to it based on their individual interpretation of the discussion (Chan, 2001). As Chao and Parker (2007) posit, these discussions can broaden those that might occur in the classroom and lead to a deeper learning experience. Wikis, when used effectively in conjunction with best practices, create learning environments where learners work together with peers and instructors to facilitate learning through a collaborative approach (Chao & Parker).

References

Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 41(2) (March/April). Retrieved November 2006 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf

Casey, H. K. (2008). Engaging the disengaged Using learning clubs to motivate struggling adolescent readers and writers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(4), 284-294.

Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science, 29(6), 443-479.

Chao, J & Parker, K. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 57 – 72.

Evans, P. (2006). The wiki factor. BizEd, January/February, 28-32. Retrieved November 2006 from http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/Archives/JanFeb06/p28-33.pdf

Gijlers, H., Saab, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: How instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252-267.

Howe, C. (2009). Collaborative group work in middle childhood Joint construction, unresolved contradiction and the growth of knowledge. Human Development, 52(4), 215(25)-240.

Kahn, S. (2009) Wonderful Wikis and Internet forums. Science and Children, 46(9), 27-31.

Kumpulainen, K., & Kaartinen, S. (2003). The interpersonal dynamics of collaborative reasoning in peer interactive dyads. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4), 333-370.

Laursson, J & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning. Computer-Supported Learning, 4, 371-402.

Lund, A. (2008). Wikis a collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35-54.

Mac, B. & Coninum, D. (2008). Using Wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 437-455.

Peterson, E. (2009). Using a Wiki to enhance cooperative learning in a real analysis course. PRIMUS, 1, 18 - 28.

Schaffert, S., Gruber, A. & Westenthaler, R. (2006). A semantic wiki for collaborative knowledge formation. In S. Reich, G. Güntner, T. Pellegrini, A. & Wahler (Eds.): Semantic Content Engineering, Austria: Trauner Verlag. Retrieved November 2006 http://www.salzburgresearch.at/research/gfx/SemsikiForCollKnowForm_20060120.pdf.

Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning? Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, 9-22.