Authenticity: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 10: Line 10:
* teacher authenticity <ref name="bruychkere2017"/>
* teacher authenticity <ref name="bruychkere2017"/>
* task authenticity  
* task authenticity  
* learning environment authenticity
* learning environment authenticity <ref> Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. </ref>
* assessment authenticity <ref> Gulikers, J. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86. </ref>
* assessment authenticity <ref> Gulikers, J. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86. </ref>
* learner authenticity (“just be yourself”) <ref>Rogers, C. R. (1979). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Pub</ref>
* learner authenticity (“just be yourself”) <ref>Rogers, C. R. (1979). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Pub</ref>

Latest revision as of 18:43, 8 April 2019

Draft

Introduction

Authenticity is term that is often heard in so-called "new" pedagogies, although its roots are much older since traditional education was mostly based on an apprenticeship model.

“Authenticity is an often-heard term with respect to education. Tasks should be authentic, the learning environment should be authentic and, above all, the teacher should be authentic.” [1]

We therefore can distinguish between:

  • teacher authenticity [1]
  • task authenticity
  • learning environment authenticity [2]
  • assessment authenticity [3]
  • learner authenticity (“just be yourself”) [4]

Bibliography

Cited with footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Bruyckere, P. De, & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Measuring teacher authenticity: Criteria students use in their perception of teacher authenticity. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1354573. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1354573
  2. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
  3. Gulikers, J. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86.
  4. Rogers, C. R. (1979). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Pub