Communal constructivism: Difference between revisions
m (→Bibliography) |
m (→Foundations) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Foundations == | == Foundations == | ||
According to Holmes et al. (2001), the concept of communal constructivism draws from several sources. | In our opinion, communal constructivism is not so much a learning theory as a pedagogic approach. Of course, it does have learning theoretical foundations. According to Holmes et al. (2001), the concept of communal constructivism draws from several sources. | ||
* [[socio-constructivism]] | * [[socio-constructivism]] | ||
* [[cognitive apprenticeship]] | * [[cognitive apprenticeship]] | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
ideas of cognitive apprenticeship, the publishing of information, flexibility in the time table, a radical look at the way in which | ideas of cognitive apprenticeship, the publishing of information, flexibility in the time table, a radical look at the way in which | ||
assessment is done, and so forth.}} <ref name="holmes2001"/> | assessment is done, and so forth.}} <ref name="holmes2001"/> | ||
Earlier work laid the foundations for communal constructivism. For example, Salomon, G. and Perkins, D. (1998) <ref name="1998">Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Chapter 1: Individual and Social Aspects of Learning. Review of Research in Education, 23(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X023001001</ref> distinguish between learning with others and learning from others. More precisely, {{quotation| [...] effective learning of any scope involves not one learning system but several functioning together in spirals of reciprocity.{{quotation|Learning to learn in an expanded sense fundamentally involves learning to learn from others, learning to learn with others, learning to draw the most from cultural artifacts other than books, learning to mediate others' learning not only for their sake but for what that will teach oneself, and learning to contribute to the learning of a collective. If the reciprocal spiral described earlier has any validity, then an individual's contribution to the learning of the collective is likely to benefit the individual as well.}} | |||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 25 February 2019
Introduction
Communal constructivism is a pedagogic strategy conceived in the mid 1990s by and Bryn Holmes and collaborators [1] and Leask and Younie [2], It merges ideas from socio-constructivism and "sharing philosophies", e.g. knowledge building and connectivism.
“The theme, or educational philosophy, [...] is one we call ‘communal constructivism’, by which we mean an approach to learning in which students not only construct their own knowledge (constructivism) as a result of interacting with their environment (social constructivism), but are also actively engaged in the process of constructing knowledge for their learning community. [...] What we argue for is a communal constructivism where students and teachers are not simply engaged in developing their own information but actively involved in creating knowledge that will benefit other students and teachers. In this model students will not simply pass through a course like water through a pipe but instead, river-like, leave their own imprint in the development of the course, their school or university, and ideally the discipline. This will result in a gain for the institutions or course, but more importantly the students themselves will benefit.(Holmes et al., 2001) [1]”
“Communal constructivism is an approach to learning in which students construct their own knowledge as a result of their experiences and interactions with others, and are afforded the opportunity to contribute this knowledge to a communal knowledge base for the benefit of existing and new learners.” (Holmes et al., 2006:86) [3]
“e-Learning takes the concept of ‘community of learners’ a considerable step forward by enabling less formal communities, that is, less formal than the organizational structure of business enterprises or a school or university would imply, to create a self-sustaining communal learning environment. We call this extension to the range of socio-constructivist variants ‘communal constructivism’ (Holmes et al., 2001), a process in which individuals not only learn socially but contribute their learning to the creation of a communal knowledge base for other learners. Online learning affords them the linked community, the knowledge bases, the knowledge-creation tools and the facility to provide their learning for others.” Holmes & Gardner (2006:76) [3]
Foundations
In our opinion, communal constructivism is not so much a learning theory as a pedagogic approach. Of course, it does have learning theoretical foundations. According to Holmes et al. (2001), the concept of communal constructivism draws from several sources.
- socio-constructivism
- cognitive apprenticeship
- Field research on Japanes 'han' (“A han is made up of 3 or 4 students within a class and it is the responsibility of the han to make sure that all members are able to progress through the materials.”) (Holms 2001)
- Group work and peer tutoring
- PhD work
“We argue that a diverse range of techniques can, and should, be used to enrich this type of learning environment within which the focus is on learning with and for others. Peer tutoring and project-based learning are obvious techniques but we also advocate the ideas of cognitive apprenticeship, the publishing of information, flexibility in the time table, a radical look at the way in which assessment is done, and so forth.” [1]
Earlier work laid the foundations for communal constructivism. For example, Salomon, G. and Perkins, D. (1998) Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer. Use a descriptive title distinguish between learning with others and learning from others. More precisely, {{quotation| [...] effective learning of any scope involves not one learning system but several functioning together in spirals of reciprocity.“Learning to learn in an expanded sense fundamentally involves learning to learn from others, learning to learn with others, learning to draw the most from cultural artifacts other than books, learning to mediate others' learning not only for their sake but for what that will teach oneself, and learning to contribute to the learning of a collective. If the reciprocal spiral described earlier has any validity, then an individual's contribution to the learning of the collective is likely to benefit the individual as well.”
Links
Bibliography
Cited with footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Holmes, B., Tangney, B., FitzGibbon, A., Savage, T., & Mehan, S. (2001). Communal Constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others. In J. Price, D. Willis, N. E. Davis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2001--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. (Vol. 2001, pp. 3114–3119). AACE. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/17346/
- ↑ Leask, M., & Younie, S. (2001). Communal constructivist theory: information and communications technology pedagogy and internationalisation of the curriculum. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200106
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning : concepts and practice. SAGE Publications.
Other
Levin, J., Buell, J., Waugh, M., Garrett, R. & Malczewski, E. (1998) Computer Supported Collaborative Evaluation: teaching teleapprenticeships and the redesign of teacher education. Paper presented at the symposium on Apprenticeships in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April.
Riel, M. (1998) Education in the 21st Century: just-in-time learning or learning communities [on-line]. Available at: http://www.gse.uci.edu/mriel.html/jit-learning/index.html
Scardamalia, M. (2000) Can Schools Enter a Knowledge Society? Presentation at the Association for Information Technology in Teacher Education ICT Research Conference, London, January. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1999) Schools as Knowledge-building Organizations, in D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds) Today’s Children, Tomorrow’s Society: the developmental health and wealth of nations, pp. 274-289. New York: Guilford.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1999) Schools as Knowledge-building Organizations, in D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds) Today’s Children, Tomorrow’s Society: the developmental health and wealth of nations, pp. 274-289. New York: Guilford.
Woodruff, E., Brett, C., Macdonald, R. & Nason, R. (1998) Participation in Knowledge-building Communities to Promote Teaching Competency in Mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Ottawa, May.