Plagiarism

Draft

Definition

“Plagiarism is the practice of claiming or implying original authorship of (or incorporating material from) someone else's written or creative work, in whole or in part, into one's own without adequate acknowledgement. Unlike cases of forgery, in which the authenticity of the writing, document, or some other kind of object itself is in question, plagiarism is concerned with the issue of false attribution. (Wikipedia, retrieved 17:42, 25 March 2008 (MET))”

Plagiarism is one form of academic dishonesty. A related form is contract cheating, i.e. someone else produces the work. Kuro5hin has this interesting shadow scholar (2010) article, where a ghostwriter called Nathaniel Orenstam claims to have written about 5000 pages / year including a PhD thesis.

The definition of plagiarism is cultural (see below) and particular attention needs to be paid to that in order to avoid intercultural understanding problems and to help students and researchers from other than western cultures adapt to western practice.

According to Webster University , TurnitIn defines ten different forms of plagiarism. Some are more severe than others, some may be due to neglect.

1. Clone: complete copy of a text
2. CTRL-C: Quoting a source without citing, quoting a source with quotation marks but without citing or without quotation marks.
3. Find-replace: slight alterations, i.e. paraphrases that are not really rewritten.
4. Remix: Piecing together different sources (that includes properly paraphrased ideas) without citing.
5. Recycle: auto-plagiarism, e.g. from prior homework
6. Hybrid: A mix of proper citations and plagiarised contents
7. Mashup: Similar to CTRL-C but using slight alterations
8. 404 Error: Wrong citation, typically an author A who cited an author B
9. Aggregator: Aggregated essay material without proper reflection (e.g. the case of this article here, which is OK since it does pretend to invent anything).
10. Re-tweet: Corrected citations, but improper quotation, e.g. by changing working and structure without signalling it in a proper way.

Remediation and prevention strategies

Plagiarism most often occurs when learners are left alone to produce a term paper and/or if classes are too big. When properly scenarized with a good project-oriented instructional design model, risks seem to be much lower.

Here is a short list of strategies to consider (see also Wikipedia's dealing with contract cheating and Gretchen Pearson's Plagiarism and Anti-Plagiarism. Both retrieved 17:42, 25 March 2008 (MET)):

• Turn assignments into real personalized projects (like mini-research projects).
• Change subject areas (i.e. paper topics) for each course.
• Require step-wise delivery, lists of themes, goals, questions, resources etc. Each of these must be reified as products and be discussed an evaluated. As an example see the C3MS project-based learning model.
• In the same spirit, require an electronic research trail (e.g. have them use a wiki to work on concepts)
• Tell students that prior work must be considered and that citations are encouraged, but also announce that you will use plagiarism detection software.
• Have students present their paper and ask them tough questions.

Plagiarism in cultural contexts

According to Chien (2014:120) , “Pennycook (1996) and Sowden (2005) state that plagiarism is culturally conditioned and therefore is interpreted differently in diverse cultures. Pennycook (1996) suggests the complex nature of plagiarism, indicating that ideas of ownership, authorship, and intellectual property evolving in Western society contain distinctive cultural and historical elements.”. Even more importantly, Chien argues that, “At a deeper level, knowledge in some collectivist cultures such as those in China, Japan, and Korea, is regarded as belonging to societies, and it is a responsibility for people to share knowledge with others for the benefit of societies as a whole (Introna, Hayes, Blair, & Wood, 2003). Textual authorship is thus not owned by an individual, but is instead shared by all members of society.”

Handa and Power (2005) note that plagiarism of foreign students if often associated with their poor language skills and they argue that academic integrity and plagiarism by students from a different than western culture needs to be addressed in specific ways. In their study, the authors found, for example, that

• referencing is neither expected nor taught in undergraduate classes in the Indian context.
• “in an Indian context, lack of integrity (cheating) had nothing to do with referencing and acknowledging ideas and words from books and authors. Ideas and even words of well known writers and philosophers are considered as part of the collective bank of knowledge and learners are supposed to make use of these to learn and develop new knowledge.” (p.74)
• in a similar vein, the act of writing itself differs, i.e. in some cultures it is perfectly acceptable to build sentences from phrases in books that are viewed as "common goods" (Pennycook 1996)
• “students taught to base their writing on books and other writers’ texts to get a good mark may have a different concept of plagiarism” (p.75)

Yusof (2009) also argue that “knowledge according to some societies including Asian is considered to belong to the society as a whole and it is a duty to share it with others (Hu, 2001 in McDonnell, 2003, Introna et al, 2003). This asserts the idea of a collective society and the concept of societal interdependence advocated in Asian societies which opposes the view on the value of individual rights and ownership”.

Introna et al. (2003) state, that “in the UK, we typically expect a significant part of the assessment of a course to be some form of writing such as a critical review of reading material or an essay. For most our overseas students this is not familiar ground, as our data indicated.” In other words, students from non-western cultures are tested through "recall examinations" and are simply not used to write productions that are then evaluated. The authors (p.51) also point out that some authors (e.g. Howard (1993) based on Hull and Rose (1989) argue that patchwriting, defined as “copying from a source text and then deleting some words, altering grammatical structures, or plugging in one-for-one synonym-substitutes (p. 213).” “is a legitimate attempt to "interact with the text, relate it to your own experiences, derive your own meaning from it" (p. 150).”

Chien (2014) look at English teacher's perception of plagiarism in Taiwan adopts a developmental approach, e.g. allow students to rewrite a text as opposed to punishment.

Plagiarising from the Internet, a new frontier ?

Plagiarizing from the Internet - other than articles or books in electronic form - may not be seen as plagiarising by certain subcultures since re-blogging, mashing up, re-tweeting etc. without proper referencing is current practice and since their is a belief that everything on the Internet is (by default) public. E.g. Introna (2003:39) found that “For all groups, plagiarising material from the internet was seen by students to be a much less serious form of cheating than plagiarising from non-electronic sources.”

Tools

Commercial online

Below are a few services. We have no idea which one is best or which one offers best price/quality. - Daniel K. Schneider (Updated May 2016).

• turnitin.com. Integrates with some LMS
• Ephorus merged with TurnitIn in 2015 (?). No longer exists a separate service.
• Urkund. Integrates with some LMS
• Plagscan Free trial version for 2000 words). Integrates with some LMS
• Guardian for Content. Targets publication industry.

French commercial

• Pompotron (supporte txt, pdf, doc, rtf, ppt, html). Dead link.
• Compilatio.net

Free online software

(may include commercial extensions)

• Plagtracker. Free online webservice. Can check full papers as well as fragments. Can compare to 5 million academic papers as well as all (or most) Internet pages. (added 14:24, 24 September 2012. The free version allows copy/paster of text fragments.

Free software

English texts

• WCopyfind examines and compares a collection of document files. Can handle text, html, and some wordprocessor formats. Only useful once you identified possible sources of plagiarism.

Multilingual texts

• CopyTracker (dead link). Free software to download (also available from source forge). Not updated since 2013. Dead project ?
• Use a search engine like Google and just copy/paste some particularly well written sentence. First within quotes, then without quotes. This btw. also works for computer code.

Software plagiarism

• MOSS. A System for Detecting Software Plagiarism. Free for non-commercial use, subscription needed.

Links

Links of links

• Electronic Plagiarism Seminar
• Plagiarism Detection (JISCipas)
• Internet: Fraude et déontologie selon les acteurs universitaires

Overviews and web sites

• Plagiarism by Bruce Arnold. Good overview. See also term paper mills and incidents.
• Plagiarism Project Wiki (George Washington University, maybe not maintained)
• Plagiarism (Wikipedia)
• Plagiarism detection (Wikipedia)
• Academic dishonesty (Wikipedia)
• Contract cheating (Wikipedia)

Detection tool indexes

• detection sites and software, Electronic Plagiarism Seminar. Syracuse, NY: Noreen Reale Falcone Library, Le Moyne College, 2004, retrieved 17:42, 25 March 2008 (MET).
• Plagiarism resources

Databases

• Deja Vu: a Database of Highly Similar and Duplicate Citations

Good sources

Let's assume you want to plagiarize:

• Essay mill
• Paper mills at Urkund
• Google Scholar

References

Cited with footnotes

Other

• Proceedings of the 2nd International Plagiarism Conference (2004)
• Proceedings of the 2nd International Plagiarism Conference (2006). Open access !

• Ashworth P, Bannister P & Thorne P (1997), Guilty in whose eyes: University students perception of cheating and plagiarism, Studies in Higher Education, Vol 22 (2), pp.187-203.

• Badge, J. L., Cann, A. J., & Scott, J. (2007). To cheat or not to cheat? A trial of the JISC plagiarism detection service with biological sciences students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 1-7.

• Clarke, Robert & Thomas Lancaster (2006), Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites., 2nd International Plagiarism Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, 19 - 21 June 2006, Newcastle upon Tyne, Northumbria Learning Press.) HTML - Download

• Deckert G (1993), Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong, Journal of Second Language Writing, 2 (2), pp.131-148 .

• Howard, Rebecca (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57 (1),pp. 788-805

• Howard, Rebecca Moore. (1993) ―A Plagiarism Pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing 11(2), pp. 233-245.

• Hu, J. 2001. An Alternative perspective of Language Re-use: Insights from Textual and Learning Theories and L2 Academic Writing. English Quarterly. 33 (1), 52-62.

• Maurer, Hermann; Kappe, Frank and Bilal Zaka (2006). 'Plagiarism - A Survey, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12 (8), 1049-1084. HTHML/PDF/PS. This is good overview paper.

• Page, James. 2004. 'Cyber-pseudepigraphy: A New Challenge for Higher Education Policy and Management'. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 26(3), 429-433; HTML

• Pennycook A, (1996), Borrowing others‘ words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism, TESOL Quarterly, Vol 30 (2), pp.210-230.

• Scollon, Ron. 1995. "Plagiarism and Ideology: Identity in Intercultural Discourse." Language in Society 24 (1), 1-28.

• Yusof, D. S. M., & binti Masrom, U. K. (2011). Malaysian students’ understanding of plagiarism. Malay, 35, 72-9. http://www.academia.edu/download/31077114/33-01.pdf