COAP:COAP-2110/grading form: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Grading forms and grading scale == | |||
Grading form - Mini projects [[COAP:COAP-2110|COAP 2110]] | |||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
| Objective/Criteria | | Objective/Criteria | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
| class="data lighten" | Missing | | class="data lighten" | Missing | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | Purpose, usefulness | | class="data" | Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.5 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | Artwork and esthetic appeal | | class="data" | Artwork and esthetic appeal | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1. | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | Complexity / originality | | class="data" | Complexity / originality | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| class="data" | | | class="data" | On time | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | |||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0. | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0. | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points) | ||
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | | width="14%" class="data " | (0 points) | ||
|} | |} | ||
out of 4.4 | out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0) | ||
== Grading Scale == | |||
(I will use this to compute your grade at the end of the course) | |||
A 3.8 Very good 92.00 | |||
A- 3.5 Almost very good 89.00 | |||
B+ 3.1 Pretty good 85.00 | |||
B 2.8 Good 82.00 | |||
B- 2.5 Reasonably good 79.00 | |||
C+ 2.1 Fair 75.00 | |||
C 1.8 Rather weak / minim. 72.00 | |||
C- 1.5 Minimalist / Weak 69.00 | |||
D+ 1.1 65.00 | |||
D 0.8 Pass 62.00 | |||
F 0.7 Fail 61.00 | |||
== Final grade == | |||
Exams: 20 + 20 = 40% | |||
Homework (best four) = 40% | |||
Term project = 10% | |||
Participation = 10% | |||
Latest revision as of 22:47, 10 January 2013
Grading forms and grading scale
Grading form - Mini projects COAP 2110
| Objective/Criteria | Performance Indicators | |||||
| unsatisfactory | Just passing | Meet expectations | Very Good | Outstanding | Missing | |
| Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.5 points) | (0 points) |
| Artwork and esthetic appeal | (0.4 points) | (0.6 points) | (0.8 points) | (1.0 points) | (1.2 points) | (0 points) |
| Complexity / originality | (0.4 points) | (0.6 points) | (0.8 points) | (1.0 points) | (1.1 points) | (0 points) |
| Task requirements | (0 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Flash file documentation and comments in AS code | (0.1 points) | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| Absence of errors and strange objects | (0.1 points) | (0.2 points) | (0.3 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
| On time | (0 points) | (0 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0.4 points) | (0 points) |
out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0)
Grading Scale
(I will use this to compute your grade at the end of the course)
A 3.8 Very good 92.00 A- 3.5 Almost very good 89.00
B+ 3.1 Pretty good 85.00 B 2.8 Good 82.00 B- 2.5 Reasonably good 79.00
C+ 2.1 Fair 75.00 C 1.8 Rather weak / minim. 72.00 C- 1.5 Minimalist / Weak 69.00
D+ 1.1 65.00 D 0.8 Pass 62.00
F 0.7 Fail 61.00
Final grade
Exams: 20 + 20 = 40% Homework (best four) = 40% Term project = 10% Participation = 10%