COAP:COAP-2110/grading form: Difference between revisions

The educational technology and digital learning wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: Preview Your location: Assignments › Edit Submission Grading form - Mini projects Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators unsatisfactory Just passing Meet expectations Very Good ...)
 
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Preview
== Grading forms and grading scale ==


Your location: Assignments ›  Edit Submission
Grading form - Mini projects [[COAP:COAP-2110|COAP 2110]]
{| border="1"
| Objective/Criteria
| colspan="6" | Performance Indicators
|-
|
| class="data lighten" | unsatisfactory
| class="data lighten" | Just passing
| class="data lighten" | Meet expectations
| class="data lighten" | Very Good
| class="data lighten" | Outstanding
| class="data lighten" | Missing
|-
| class="data" | Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.5 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Artwork and esthetic appeal
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Complexity / originality
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.6 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.8 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (1.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Task requirements
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Flash file documentation and comments in AS code
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | Absence of errors and strange objects
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.1 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.2 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.3 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|-
| class="data" | On time
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0.4 points)
| width="14%" class="data " | (0 points)
|}


Grading form - Mini projects
out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0)


Objective/Criteria
== Grading Scale ==
Performance Indicators
(I will use this to compute your grade at the end of the course)


unsatisfactory
A 3.8 Very good     92.00
Just passing
A- 3.5 Almost very good    89.00
Meet expectations
Very Good
Outstanding
Missing


Purpose, usefulness and usability
B+ 3.1 Pretty good     85.00
(0.1 points)
B 2.8 Good             82.00
(0.1 points)
B- 2.5 Reasonably good     79.00
(0.2 points)
 
(0.3 points)
C+ 2.1 Fair             75.00
(0.4 points)
C 1.8 Rather weak / minim. 72.00
(0 points)
C- 1.5 Minimalist / Weak    69.00
Artwork and esthetic appeal
 
(0.6 points)
  D+ 1.1             65.00
(0.8 points)
D 0.8 Pass             62.00
(1 points)
 
(1.1 points)
F 0.7 Fail             61.00
(1.2 points)
 
(0 points)
== Final grade ==
Complexity / originality
 
(0.6 points)
Exams: 20 + 20      = 40%
(0.8 points)
Homework (best four) = 40%
(1 points)
Term project        = 10%
(1.1 points)
  Participation        = 10%
(1.2 points)
(0 points)
Task requirements
(0 points)
(0.1 points)
(0.2 points)
(0.3 points)
(0.4 points)
(0 points)
Flash file documentation and comments in AS code
(0.1 points)
(0.1 points)
(0.2 points)
(0.3 points)
(0.4 points)
(0 points)
Absence of errors and strange objects
(0.1 points)
(0.2 points)
(0.3 points)
(0.4 points)
(0.4 points)
(0 points)
Global coherence
(0 points)
(0.1 points)
(0.2 points)
(0.3 points)
(0.4 points)
(0 points)
   
out of 4.3999999999999995

Latest revision as of 22:47, 10 January 2013

Grading forms and grading scale

Grading form - Mini projects COAP 2110

Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators
unsatisfactory Just passing Meet expectations Very Good Outstanding Missing
Purpose, usefulness, usability, global coherence (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0.5 points) (0 points)
Artwork and esthetic appeal (0.4 points) (0.6 points) (0.8 points) (1.0 points) (1.2 points) (0 points)
Complexity / originality (0.4 points) (0.6 points) (0.8 points) (1.0 points) (1.1 points) (0 points)
Task requirements (0 points) (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
Flash file documentation and comments in AS code (0.1 points) (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
Absence of errors and strange objects (0.1 points) (0.2 points) (0.3 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)
On time (0 points) (0 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0.4 points) (0 points)

out of 4.4 (bigger than 4.0 grades will be rounded down to 4.0)

Grading Scale

(I will use this to compute your grade at the end of the course)

A	3.8	Very good	     92.00
A-	3.5	Almost very good     89.00
B+	3.1	Pretty good	     85.00
B	2.8	Good	             82.00
B-	2.5	Reasonably good	     79.00
C+	2.1	Fair	             75.00
C	1.8	Rather weak / minim. 72.00
C-	1.5	Minimalist / Weak    69.00
D+	1.1		             65.00
D	0.8	Pass	             62.00
F	0.7	Fail	             61.00

Final grade

Exams: 20 + 20       = 40%
Homework (best four) = 40%
Term project         = 10%
Participation        = 10%