User talk:AydınSarıkaya: Difference between revisions
(→project for methods -- ~~~~ -- ~~~~: new section) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== [[User:AydınSarıkaya|AydınSarıkaya]] 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST) == | |||
Can project be a unique method which lost its hegemony on "generalisation" that is a slave of ip protocol which has its own ascii-generals against organic-hacks? | |||
As a spectrality from a bit to tetra, each project seems a production of new way that can be a new method if should call it, but instead of using grandparents names, new nouns should be pronounced. | |||
This can be a clear sense for clarifying some darkclouds on the identifying old methodic categories and discourses for some new technologies, not iron or steel but iron and still that can speak and dance by codes. | |||
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too. | |||
==== Do we need a scenario or a studio? ==== | |||
<small>So stu.pid question for stu.dent learning teaching.</small>needs more. | |||
Can they be used for interpellation of software based learning? | |||
That looks like a fuzzy manner. | |||
In terms of our sensual world activities, scenario is mainly action based text that represent some role modelisation. The studio is the referance for its place environment to produce etc. | |||
So, more clear dimensions. | |||
However when we evaluate them in case of software based learning models, all they become unclear. | |||
Because rather than body language referances, it becomes ascii or programming language referance. Hence to clarify the meaning of learning is depended to the clarification of software design of codes. | |||
It was an old proverb that if you tell me your friends, I can tell you who you are. | |||
Its current version can be; | |||
If you tell me your software I can tell you who+how you are+learning. | |||
This does not seem so unclear if the traditional stress among the free, open and licenced softwares is checked, in response to the spectral typifications of copyright rules. | |||
In a similar manner the education side can be evaluated as the spectralisation of learning ways without regarding dominant fixed referances to the body language centered terms and approaches. | |||
That looks at “human machine interactions” manners, perse. | |||
Moreover all that seem a wave constructions for the softwares to support “disabled way of life” of persons. | |||
That is the positive side instantly until its domination as being the source of “disabled” life. | |||
Due to this reason, the educative critiques and evaluations of general framework is an essential and urgent referance for both of scenario and studio based learning including all other possible ones as well. | |||
That | That also sounds “what learning means”, that can clarify itself on the design and ability by the authors who can sign the definition of design with resigning the prefix of “dis” to classify abiliy, perse! | ||
Latest revision as of 19:14, 26 June 2012
AydınSarıkaya 22:21, 10 June 2012 (CEST)
Can project be a unique method which lost its hegemony on "generalisation" that is a slave of ip protocol which has its own ascii-generals against organic-hacks?
As a spectrality from a bit to tetra, each project seems a production of new way that can be a new method if should call it, but instead of using grandparents names, new nouns should be pronounced.
This can be a clear sense for clarifying some darkclouds on the identifying old methodic categories and discourses for some new technologies, not iron or steel but iron and still that can speak and dance by codes.
That is also the sceene for the nearfuture of a baby who will have to run with/against them, not only on world but on outer-space,too.
Do we need a scenario or a studio?
So stu.pid question for stu.dent learning teaching.needs more.
Can they be used for interpellation of software based learning? That looks like a fuzzy manner.
In terms of our sensual world activities, scenario is mainly action based text that represent some role modelisation. The studio is the referance for its place environment to produce etc. So, more clear dimensions.
However when we evaluate them in case of software based learning models, all they become unclear.
Because rather than body language referances, it becomes ascii or programming language referance. Hence to clarify the meaning of learning is depended to the clarification of software design of codes.
It was an old proverb that if you tell me your friends, I can tell you who you are. Its current version can be; If you tell me your software I can tell you who+how you are+learning. This does not seem so unclear if the traditional stress among the free, open and licenced softwares is checked, in response to the spectral typifications of copyright rules.
In a similar manner the education side can be evaluated as the spectralisation of learning ways without regarding dominant fixed referances to the body language centered terms and approaches.
That looks at “human machine interactions” manners, perse.
Moreover all that seem a wave constructions for the softwares to support “disabled way of life” of persons. That is the positive side instantly until its domination as being the source of “disabled” life. Due to this reason, the educative critiques and evaluations of general framework is an essential and urgent referance for both of scenario and studio based learning including all other possible ones as well.
That also sounds “what learning means”, that can clarify itself on the design and ability by the authors who can sign the definition of design with resigning the prefix of “dis” to classify abiliy, perse!